Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Weather RMK Identifier

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Weather RMK Identifier

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Dec 2003, 20:45
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Israel
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Weather RMK Identifier

Hi,

Where can I find the all explanations about the RMK words?

What is the mining of the RMK?

CYYZ 281306Z 00000KT 1SM BR SCT240 RMK FG2CI1

Thank's
danyoren is offline  
Old 28th Dec 2003, 22:02
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As far as I remember, that is to explain what is the extent of the cloud coverage. In more details, it tells in different terms what the coverage is. In this case, they are reporting 2/8 fog and 1/8 cirrus coverage.
jtstream is offline  
Old 29th Dec 2003, 18:01
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: España
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The indicator RMK indicates the begining of a section containing information included by national decission and which will not be emitted internationally.

That´s what my book says.
rodquiman is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2003, 18:19
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: London
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As far as I know in the UK, RMK in a METAR or it may just be TREND.....?, or commonly referred to as a landing forecast can only be issued if a qualified Met man is present at the time of compiling the METAR. I know a TREND is a general forecast trend for the next 2 hrs. If only a observer that is not a qualified Met man is present then no TREND can be issued as the METAR is really an observation and not a forecast.

Again I’m not sure if the RMK would be the same as a TREND in needing a qualified Met man……..?
let_me_fly is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2003, 18:28
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tracy Island
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
JTstream is close but I'm not sure that 2/8 (octas) fog is correct. The full decode will be in your jeppesen manual, MET section. RMK in N America is reserved for general met observations only on metars or speci.
Regards and happy new year to all
FEBA
FEBA is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2003, 06:18
  #6 (permalink)  
TightYorksherMan
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Peak District
Age: 41
Posts: 1,570
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Try and get hold of a copy of 'Get Met' published by the UK Met Office - i think its free.

http://www.met-office.gov.uk/aviation/

Best of luck

Jinkster
Jinkster is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2003, 06:36
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Canada
Age: 68
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fog 2, Cirrus 1 is indeed correct.
604guy is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2003, 16:33
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 3,648
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

Fog 2, Cirrus 1 is indeed correct
This is a Canadian speciality.

The conventions used are the same as in the Canadian hourly observation on the Surface Weather Record. That particular part is described here as column 40. Although it says that F (not FG) is fog, the convention used in METARs seems to be FG. Fog seems to encompass mist for the purpose of the RMK.
bookworm is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.