Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

DU in WTC Crash 767's?

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

DU in WTC Crash 767's?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Mar 2002, 12:40
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: wales (new south)
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation DU in WTC Crash 767's?

Rumour is now circulating that there was depleted uraniun in the 767's that crashed into the WTC. I know that there was DU in the EL AL 747 that crashed in Amsterdam, but I didnt think that 767's carried any.. .. .Could somebody set me straight on this and quash this rumour if there is no basis to it.
RogerTangoFoxtrotIndigo is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2002, 19:30
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

If it's the mass balance weights your talking about, they are made from Tungsten on the 767. . . . <small>[ 16 March 2002, 18:56: Message edited by: Golden Rivet ]</small>
Golden Rivet is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2002, 19:44
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UTC +8
Posts: 2,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation

Ironically, the most common use of Depleted Uranium is in "conventional" (non nuclear)warheads, such as artillery shells, etc.... <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="eek.gif" />
GlueBall is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2002, 20:13
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Blighty
Posts: 788
Received 87 Likes on 22 Posts
Post

Most large boeings use depleted uranium in the rudder as mass balance.. .Not sure about the 767 though, even so, why is this news?
HOVIS is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2002, 02:07
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: nr Farnborough, England
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

RTFI,. .Know where you're from. In a fire like that DU can create some nasty by-products.. .Can't "quash" what you say but I think DU was in 747's, TriStars and dc 10's but not sure about the 757/767. Think it was Tritium not tungsten. Used as a counterweight at the back.
Effendi is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2002, 01:41
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Chichester, UK
Posts: 871
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Tritium is an isotope of Hydrogen - not much use as a counterweight.... . . . <small>[ 18 March 2002, 21:42: Message edited by: Evo7 ]</small>
Evo7 is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2002, 02:33
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: nr Farnborough, England
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Evo 7,. .Obviously not tritium, but I certainly remember that DU was superceded by some superheavy substitute. Anyone out there help?
Effendi is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2002, 05:48
  #8 (permalink)  
Union Goon
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 1,097
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Tungsten was the replacement. .. .CHeers. .Wino
Wino is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2002, 06:20
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Think I said that at the beginning of the thread?
Golden Rivet is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2002, 17:41
  #10 (permalink)  

Usual disclaimers apply!
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: EGGW
Posts: 843
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

What about the densitometers? <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="wink.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="eek.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="wink.gif" /> No DU but a small pellet of AML241
gas path is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2002, 20:52
  #11 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: wales (new south)
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Yes, it made the news because of the polution that was being given off from the remains of the WTC. Some firepersons (firepeople?) are complaining of respiritory problems.. .. .I didnt think the 767 had any DU in it but it's still in 747's? if it is to be used as a counterweight there must be tonnes of it, i can recall a fair few burnt out classics, is there any evidence (apart from Amsterdam) that it has caused any harm . .. .yes i guess thats the least of your problems in an emergency situation but i ask anyway
RogerTangoFoxtrotIndigo is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2002, 21:23
  #12 (permalink)  

Usual disclaimers apply!
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: EGGW
Posts: 843
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unhappy

Sadly, I'm not suprised people are complaining of respiratory problems after seeing all that dust that was produced, probably a lot of it was asbestos and sprayed insulation used for fireproofing.. .I would have thought that all the DU would have been removed before those old airframes (classics) were torched.. .BTW wasn't the problems in the aftermath of the Amsterdam crash caused by some of the (dubious???) freight that was being carried?. .. .edited for spelling!. . . . <small>[ 21 March 2002, 17:25: Message edited by: gas path ]</small>
gas path is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.