Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

wheel run-up idea

Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

wheel run-up idea

Old 6th Mar 2002, 22:32
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Chicago
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post wheel run-up idea

I was wondering if anyone has ever thought about some type of system that would spin the wheels when they were extended so as to reduce wear on touchdown. Such as, fins on the wheel assem. that would drive each wheel as it sliced through the air. Ive been thinking about it some time, Has it already been covered?
BigJETS is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2002, 22:39
  #2 (permalink)  

Iconoclast
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The home of Dudley Dooright-Where the lead dog is the only one that gets a change of scenery.
Posts: 2,132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

To: Big Jets. .. .The run up idea has been tried on many occasions to include placing aerodynamic flaps on the tires to get them spinning prior to touch down. Many systems have been tried and all have been eventually rejected.
Lu Zuckerman is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2002, 22:46
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

One good reason against passive, aerodynamical solutions would be that, although maybe beneficial before landing, you'd have to really brake those wheels after takeoff before retracting them.. .Why? Ever tried to spin up a bicycle wheel real fast and then turn it by 90 degrees...?
RadarContact is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2002, 23:04
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Chicago
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Good point re: rigidity, but could you spin down using the same idea? I guess if it has been tried before, then it may have had some value? One disadvantage I can think of already may be the possibility of small parts falling off. Im curious to why it has been abandoned. Thanks.
BigJETS is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2002, 23:57
  #5 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Aired at least 12 months ago and I told the story of the Lancaster which had rather bad precesion in a trial during the war. Have a search back.
BOAC is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2002, 01:16
  #6 (permalink)  
Mistrust in Management
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 973
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Radar Contact,. .. .All the airliners I've operated do 'brake' the wheels during retraction. That would be B737, B747, B777 and A320. I think all other current Boeing and Airbus types do as well.. .. .Regards. .Exeng
exeng is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2002, 01:33
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Doesn't the Concorde set the mains spinning (forward) before touchdown?
willbav8r is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2002, 04:55
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: In da north country
Age: 62
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Either Goodyear, or Goodrich tried this many years ago, and the gyroscopic forces made it very difficult to control!!. .Thats a bad thing!
Willit Run is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2002, 05:36
  #9 (permalink)  
Mistrust in Management
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 973
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Time to close this topic I think.
exeng is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2002, 06:48
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 262
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Arrow

willbav8r. .. .No
Bellerophon is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2002, 07:10
  #11 (permalink)  
Union Goon
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 1,097
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

tire wear is not from touchdown suprisingly. 90 percent of it is from slow speed taxing around corners and whatnot.. .. .The smoking tire on landing looks spectacular but is actually inconsequential. (I hate that I can use longer words than I can spell). .. .Cheers. .Wino
Wino is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2002, 07:39
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Ex-pat Aussie in the UK
Posts: 5,791
Received 112 Likes on 54 Posts
Post

Nosewheel spinup kits are still used on gravel kit conversions for business aircraft types - stops you kicking gravel into the airframe and engines.
Checkboard is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2002, 07:55
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: CYZV
Age: 77
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

Thought Cessna tried that with the Citation and gave it up as a bad idea? <img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="confused.gif" />
pigboat is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2002, 10:02
  #14 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Chicago
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Thanks for indulging me. I know its a logical idea but I was just curious. I know tires arent cheap. . .. .keep em flyin
BigJETS is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2002, 17:21
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica"> All the airliners I've operated do 'brake' the wheels during retraction. That would be B737, B747, B777 and A320. I think all other current Boeing and Airbus types do as well.. . </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica">Sure they do. But why put that extra energy into the rotation while braking the wheels? That was my point... <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="wink.gif" />
RadarContact is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2002, 04:28
  #16 (permalink)  
Mistrust in Management
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 973
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Radar,. .. .I see your point, but I believe that we are talking about relatively 'small' amounts of energy here. And with A/C that have carbon brakes apparently the brake wear is not an issue; but that has been debated before.. .. .Regards. .Exeng
exeng is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2002, 05:48
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Lets see, the Lockheed Constitution and the Consolidated-Vultee (Convair) XC-99 used motors to spin up the tyres prior to touchdown...and these aeroplanes had rather "limited" production....
411A is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.