Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

767 ER Engine Anti Ice

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

767 ER Engine Anti Ice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Jan 2002, 02:06
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: West
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question 767 ER Engine Anti Ice

My company just came out with a memo that they want us to operate both the engine and wing anti- ice in the "auto" position on the jets that have the 3 position selector switch (all but a handful of our ERs). They want us to do so even in icing conditions (normally we select "on"). They say Boeing recommends it, but I highly doubt that. I also don't by his (the guy that wrote the memo) explanation that operating the system like this prevents run-back icing on the wing. To the contrary, I believe preventing ice formation in the first place (by having the selector "on" in icing conditions) is the best practice. Perhaps I need to be better educated on the system or on the latest information about inflight icing. Any ideas?
None is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2002, 17:49
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Farnham, UK
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lightbulb

None

My understanding as a RR 767-300ER driver is that the Eng anti-ice is on at all time where there is visible moisture below +10 OAT, except when climbing and cruising when SAT <-40. This heats the cowl intake, turns on the ignitors and prevents the ice from building up, then breaking off to disapear down the intake removing fan blades. Run back not really an issue here.

For wings, it was described to me that it should be operated a bit like pneumatic anti-ice boots. When ice is detected (using the high tech wiper arm) switch on the anti-ice for 1 minute. Then off for 1 minute, repeat until you leave icing condition or at 500' on approach 'cos you need the power for the go-around. Because it is only the leading edge (and then only outboard of the engines), run back is an issue. Operating it using cycles is supposed to dislodge the ice build up without run back occuring.

We do not have the "auto" function on our models, so not sure wether the auto function uses continuous heat or cycle method.

apologies if this is teaching you to suck eggs....hope it helps.
<img src="cool.gif" border="0">
Thunderbug is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2002, 19:30
  #3 (permalink)  
vmo
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: 43100"
Age: 58
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Auto only for us, with eng. a/i to on for take-off in vis. moisture and less than 10 degr. celc. and when taken into account with take-off performance. Works more than fine. Little vibrators do their work well.
vmo is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.