Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Airbus Question (A 320 -100)

Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Airbus Question (A 320 -100)

Old 8th Jan 2002, 13:21
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Age: 52
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Airbus Question (A 320 -100)

Does anyone know what may have caused the following?

Before engine start I noticed on the F/O's PFD that the pitch down graduations were visible (as well as the normal pitch up indications) along with a Rad Alt indication (fluctuating). We reset the cb's for both rad alts with no success. In the end we dispatched with Rad Alt 2 c/b pulled and hence were Cat 2 capable only (with wx deteriorating at destination - hence 3 tonnes xtra taken!). On approach for a Cat 2 landing we received a spurious 'hundred above' and 'minimums' call at around 2500' followed by the correct auto callouts at the right time.

Was this just simply a rad alt failure or something else?
Sean Dell is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2002, 10:27
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

More thn likely one or more of the four rad alt antennas were faulty
Zeke is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2002, 19:41
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Or possibly a problem with the FWC, Flight Warning Computer.
Iceman49 is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2002, 20:47
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: ....
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Sounds more like the FWC - The erroneous pitch indications on the PFD would support that view. Normally, if resetting the radalt c/b does not work, trying the FWC reset (only on the ground and parked of course!) will solve most problems like yours.

Computers are wonderful things! A United mechanic I was talking to the other day said that the difference between Boeings and Airbuses was that most things on a boeing could be fixed by hitting them, while most things on the airbus could be fixed by resetting the computers and then hitting them if they still did not work!
Busta Level is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2002, 02:38
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Sounds like RF leakage between the Rad Alt Antennae causing spurious ramping. The rad alt's only track down so if a spurious signal(leakage) is recieved (100 call @ 2500')the rad alt will then try to resynch on the actual ground return signal.

I seriously doubt the problem to be related to the FWC this will only process the audio call outs from signals received from the RAD ALT (In This Case)
Hope this helps Conehead.

[ 13 January 2002: Message edited by: IMA Conehead ]</p>
IMA Conehead is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2002, 11:40
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Bahrain
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

As far as the pitch error I would definitely suspect IR2 since it provides attitude information to the F/o's PFD and hence on the gound I would most likely do a realignment. As far as part two of your question I had exactly the same experience two years ago on a CATI ILS and it was associated with the Collins Radio Altimeter. Did you arm the approach push button above 5000 ft on that approach?
Collins needed a modification two years ago because it did a self test at 5000 and if you armed the approach p/b prior to the self test (above 5000) there was the posibility of errors. However this mod has been implemented a long time ago. Chech what make of Radio altimiters are installed on your aircraft.
CaptA320 is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2002, 13:55
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Age: 52
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

Thanks for all your comments. This damn aeroplane still puzzles me at times! In answer to your question A320 we did not arm the approach above 5,000'. I will however next time do a realignment on the ground.

Cheers
Sean Dell is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2002, 14:19
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: HKG
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

On the -200 we used to get weird indications / Callouts, on the approach. We were subsequently told that the Rad Alts can get confused when operating in heavy rain. It was reported that in certain circumstances spurious Double Eng Fail ECAM warnings had occurred, on approach at about 2500'...All associated somehow with RAD ALTs???? <img src="confused.gif" border="0">
Millenium Falcon is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2002, 16:45
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Sunrise Senior Living
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

FCOM 36/2 'Radio Altimeter Anomalies During Adverse Wx Conditions' is worth a read although not relevant to the original post.
heers
mcdhu <img src="confused.gif" border="0">
mcdhu is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.