Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

CAT 11 APPR based on baro DH

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

CAT 11 APPR based on baro DH

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th November 2003 | 07:48
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 1
From: wherever
CAT 11 APPR based on baro DH

I've just found out that here on the other side of the pond a cat 2 appr can be based on a barometric min. Are there any in Europe?
FE Hoppy is offline  
Old 6th November 2003 | 16:58
  #2 (permalink)  


PPRuNeaholic
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,255
Likes: 0
From: Cairns FNQ
Lightbulb

I have an idea that, in some parts of Scandinavia, there are places where they use a Cat. I ILS to Cat. II minimums. I don't know too much about them though, so don't know if they use Radalt or Baro. Maybe someone else can clarify?
OzExpat is offline  
Old 8th November 2003 | 02:05
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
From: The Heart
Never heard of it in Scandinavia. The whole point of a CAT 2 is that the approach area has been surveyed for the radar alt.

How do you do it on barometric if you have a difference on the two altimeters?
Miserlou is offline  
Old 8th November 2003 | 19:25
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,704
Likes: 1
From: Who can say?
I don't know of any in Europe. I know that there are one or two Cat II approaches in the USA which operate based on Baro altimeter because the nature of the ground below makes RadAlt readings more or less useless. As I recall, they are at airports in mountainous areas. Can't remember any more details. There was a thread a few months back which touched on this - you may find it if you do a search.
Captain Stable is offline  
Old 8th November 2003 | 21:47
  #5 (permalink)  


PPRuNeaholic
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,255
Likes: 0
From: Cairns FNQ
A Danish friend of mine was telling me about it some time ago. I should've been paying more attention. I shall ask him about it again and, this time, promise to take notes...
OzExpat is offline  
Old 9th November 2003 | 02:35
  #6 (permalink)  
m&v
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
From: delta.bc.canada
Captn Stable,I heard about this (it came up at a CO'standards meeting,few years ago now).FAA had given dispensation to AA???
at Cincinatti,as you say to get home base with uncharted territory below at DH(gulley/valley)..There was also a 'problem'at Seattle,I believe they tried to build a steel bridge to 'reflect'DH on the Radalt
m&v is offline  
Old 10th November 2003 | 06:45
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 1
From: wherever
There is one here in Pittsburgh. It makes tou wonder??? some aircraft use RA/BARO selections to latch cat 1 or cat 11. In this case it wont work.
FE Hoppy is offline  
Old 10th November 2003 | 11:22
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 3
From: Arizona USA
Nothing new, KLAX had CAT II approaches based on the baro altimeter twenty five years ago.
Requires specific altimeter/CADC checks (beyond the ordinary) on a regular basis.
411A is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.