Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

MSA correction for wind


Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

MSA correction for wind

Old 28th December 2001 | 18:03
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: southampton
Post MSA correction for wind

Our ops manual suggests that we make a correction to en route saftey altitudes if high ground is over 2000 feet,eg o to 20 kts of wind we add 500 feet.
Does this factor also need to be applied to the MSAs on arrival charts if near high ground ie Geneva.
NICK HEFF is offline  
Old 28th December 2001 | 19:22
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: London, UK
Post

Just a minor point, but if we work for the same airline, it is not the MSA that must be increased, but the MOA (Minimum Operating Altitude). In the case of Geneva I would say yes, it should be increased.
invalid entry is offline  
Old 28th December 2001 | 20:05
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
From: Planet Claire
Angel

Nick, from your post (and from the books of course) it seems that a correction is required for all wind speeds including 0 knots. therefore why not just increase the moa by 500' everywhere. I cant figure out why a wind of 0 or 1 kt requires any correction. or am i missing a trick somewhere?
brain fade is offline  
Old 28th December 2001 | 23:15
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: southampton
Post

Thanks for the info .I am still a bit confused,if on my Jepp plate the MSA is 3800 feet, do I assume from this that there is high ground over 2000 feet and then add 500 feet to the printed msa?.
Please help OPC in a few weeks.
NICK HEFF is offline  
Old 28th December 2001 | 23:49
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: Johannesburg
Wink

I speak under correction, but I would think the wind correction is to allow for mountain/standing waves. These can be very powerfull - I have had a colleague relate to me an experience going into Cape Town(9000ft Amsl @ 15DME) where he could not maintain the required altitude as he was caught in a down standing wave - pretty scary.

Anyway, I would have thought that the reason to add the extra height to the MSA, but really only applies when surface wind speed start reaching about 20 kts. Maybe one of the met boffins can fill us in on exact requirements.

Regards
4g
<img src="smile.gif" border="0">
4g_handicap is offline  
Old 29th December 2001 | 01:48
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
From: europe
Post

ARTICLE IN jAN 2001 pILOT, OUT NOW, CALLED HIGH SEIRRA DISCUSSES DOWNDRAFTS IN LIGHT AIRCRAFT CONTEXT.
SWISS 1/2 MILLION TOPO WOULD INDICATE MOUNTAIN AND OBSTACLE HEIGHTS, WHICH ARE VERY VARIED IN THE GENEVA AREA.
bluskis is offline  
Old 30th December 2001 | 16:40
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: Laanden innit
Post

Hi Nick

you seem to be getting technical in your old age, i never realised you actually read the books.
MUNCH is offline  
Old 1st January 2002 | 17:44
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: Northwich
Cool

Nick-Yes it does need to be added to arrival chart MSA(the rule is whenever you operate within 20NM of terrain &gt;2,000'AMSL).
It is actually more important that you apply the correction to approach MSAs as these only give 1,000' separation(Geneva NW spot alt 5,636 give app plate MSA 6,700').Route charts give 1,000' unless the area is defined by the state as mountainous in which case clearance is increased to 2,000'.
Although turbulence caused by mountain waves is not an issue,at light wind speeds,areas of local low pressure can be generated which cause the altimeter to over read.
In Geneva at this time of year you may need to apply an alt temp correction if colder than ISA-15
Good luck-Al

[ 01 January 2002: Message edited by: alosaurus ]</p>
alosaurus is offline  
Old 2nd January 2002 | 00:03
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: southampton
Post

Thanks for the replys Pruners, Happy new year!
NICK HEFF is offline  
Old 2nd January 2002 | 06:41
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
From: Over There
Talking

If your using jeppesen altitudes then they are good for up to 30Kts of wind. MSA does not need to be corrected for wind speed but does for cold temperature. Check the link below.

<a href="http://www.jerryflint.net/Minimum%20Altitudes%20ER.htm" target="_blank">web page</a>
cpdude is offline  
Old 5th January 2002 | 12:56
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: Northwich
Exclamation

CPDUDE-Checked your link it says MSA only gives 1000' obstacle clearance (which means you must apply wind correction 0-30 knots);Grid MORA (route info) is corrected for windspeeds of up to 30 knots)
alosaurus is offline  
Old 5th January 2002 | 18:58
  #12 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 74
Likes: 1
From: Europe
Post

Just for info... Recently the MSA changed here in GVA. Instead of being based on the PAS VOR, it is now based on GVA VOR, and MSA has gone up to 7000' in the North... In the Southeasterly sector (002-245 bearing) it is 10600' (7000' within 10nm)
TopSwiss 737 is offline  
Old 7th January 2002 | 01:53
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: Northwich
Thumbs up

Topswiss-Thanx.
alosaurus is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.