Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

What A/C now for BE!

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

What A/C now for BE!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Dec 2001, 14:38
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Horsham UK
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Here at Rimmer News we've been looking at this question since the demise of the RJX and this is what we reckon of the various runners and riders:

EMB170/175: A strong possibility, John Doyle was on the blower to Big Jim within an hour of the RJX announcement. The 170 will be LCY capable since that is a requirement of Crossair as launch customer (it's in the contract no cert no order). The 175 is a bijou strech-ette which takes max seating to 86 or CRJ900 size but it will not be LCY capable. Additionally there is the high commonality with the 190/195 which would take them up to 108 seats for non LCY routes with the same type rating.

CRJ700: Less likely for two reasons, 1 it ain't LCY capable - can't make the single engine miss Canary Wharf climb requirement. 2 BE is still trying to get out of the CRJ200 deal.

A318/319: Only feasible if the LCY requirement is left to the Q400s and other Dash8s. But there is always the cost problem of shrink a/c especially in the case of the 318. In addition there are some questions about the 318 programme - it too could be for the chop (or so some of the rumors go)

717: As per the 318/319 in that the LCY requirement would have to be dropped but we reckon that have taken the decision to continue production Boeing will match Airbus pricing to shift some more a/c. On the other hand, it's a pretty heavy a/c for a 110 seater in modern terms.

In short, the at Rimmer news we reckon Embraer has got to be a good bet but - but if not the 717 could be an outsider worth a punt.
Ace Rimmer is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2001, 14:08
  #22 (permalink)  
acm
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

How about ex Crossair Avro RJ ? Introducing a new acft is very expensive and BE knows very well about that. Staying with BAe product is plane common sense for the moment.
acm is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.