Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Uncontained engine failure

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Uncontained engine failure

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Oct 2001, 15:21
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Greece
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Uncontained engine failure

Hello,can anyone explain what is the difference(if any)between engine failure and "uncontained" engine failure?
Thank you.
cptn-bat is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2001, 15:26
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: UK
Age: 59
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I always thought that uncontained failure meant that bits of fan/engine had exited the engine ?
SimJock is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2001, 15:41
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Cape Town
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

In the event of a failure such as a fan blade letting go, you would not want bits of the blade hitting the fuselage, so the idea is to try to contain the debris within the engine. The LP compressor casing in some makes of engine has a circumferential wrapping of Kevlar to absorb the impact and help contain the bits.
If it fails to do so, you have an uncontained failure.
Gaspasser is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2001, 08:49
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: OZ
Posts: 1,127
Received 12 Likes on 6 Posts
Post

The word "uncontained" can be a bit misleading. The (thankfully!!) few big, bad nasty engine failures I've been involved in let lots of nuts and bolts go out the tailpipe. Because said scrap iron did not exit sideways through the engine casing, the failures were "contained" even though a fair mass was missing after landing.
A defined "uncontained" engine failure blasts bits out the side of the engine through the casing. This is obviously bad as the bits can enter another engine and turn a bad day into a nightmare.
mustafagander is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2001, 15:10
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Somewhere around the World
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

It may not generally be known but the armour plating is designed to " contain" the N1 or Fan section of the engine in the event of Foreign Object Damage resulting in break up of the Fan blades.

I am personally not aware of any engine which is currently designed to contain the N2 or high compression stages of the engine if they should subsequently break up.

Food for thought.
missioncontrol is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2001, 16:04
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Florida
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

>It may not generally be known but the armour plating is designed to " contain" the N1 or Fan section of the engine in the event of Foreign Object Damage resulting in break up of the Fan blades.

I am personally not aware of any engine which is currently designed to contain the N2 or high compression stages of the engine if they should subsequently break up.
<

The requirement is to ensure that the outcome of a single blade release (from any cause) does not burst (become uncontained) the engine casing, no mater what stage (fan, compressor or turbine). There is no requirement, nor am I aware of any claims, to contain anything other than blades (like rotor disks).

History has shown that debris still exits the engine by going forward (through aircraft inlet cowls) or aft out of the tailpipe.
Al Weaver is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2001, 09:43
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: OZ
Posts: 1,127
Received 12 Likes on 6 Posts
Post

Lomapaseo,
I think the reason that only the fan cases are armoured is that the energy released by a liberated N2 blade is quite small compared with a fan blade. Take P&W JT9D - fan blade mass about 4.5Kg and RPM 3800 or so. That's a hell of a lot of energy in the liberated blade, not to speak of the savage out of balance forces acting to destroy the bearing system. By comparison, the N2 blades are tiny, even though they spin at around 11000 rpm they contain a small fraction of the energy of a fan blade, likewise the out of balance forces.
mustafagander is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.