Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Runway alignment of ILS approaches

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Runway alignment of ILS approaches

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Oct 2001, 06:21
  #1 (permalink)  
swh

Eidolon
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Some hole
Posts: 2,179
Received 24 Likes on 13 Posts
Question Runway alignment of ILS approaches

Hi,

Could people let me know what requirement if any there is for runway alignment for ILS approaches, what is the alignment requirement for CAT I to CAT III.

Can anyone give men examples of where in the world ILS approches exist (or used to exist) without runway alignment. I think Hong Kong may have had one ....

URLs to approch plates for example airports would be appreciated, or airport idents.

Thanks

DS
swh is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2001, 16:01
  #2 (permalink)  
reimers
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Lightbulb

Nice has a 2° offset on the ILS 04R.
 
Old 6th Oct 2001, 16:38
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

JFK ils 22R has offset of 9*

seems barmy to me and doesnt half look odd when you break mins.
TickleTackle is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2001, 23:11
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UTC +8
Posts: 2,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation

Pago Pago has ILS offset due to a 500+ foot hill in proximity to threshold. (Special Airport Qualification).
GlueBall is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2001, 05:46
  #5 (permalink)  
IHL
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

In Canada an ILS has to be aligned within 3 degrees if not it's called a localizer type approach and would have non-precision approach minimums.
IHL is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2001, 06:26
  #6 (permalink)  


PPRuNeaholic
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Cairns FNQ
Posts: 3,255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

The old Hong Kong ILS was actually called "IGS" (G = Guidance). The general criteria for runway-alignment is found in Pans Ops, for the countries using that criteria, or TERPS for the USA and a few other countries.

If the airport doesn't handle international flights, the regulator can establish any appropriate local criteria in consultation with the companies using that airport. The issue is a bit more complex for airports that handle international air traffic, but you could do worse than reading up on the simple few paragraphs in Pans Ops, that explain what constitutes a runway alignment.

There are cases, for example where the final segment only needs to cross the extended centreline of the runway, to be termed runway-aligned.
OzExpat is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2001, 19:47
  #7 (permalink)  
Vmu
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Scandinavia
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Bodų(ENBO) and Bardufoss(ENDU) in northern Norway have offset ILS-approaches. Both due to terrain in the approach area.
Vmu is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2001, 03:24
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

For a CatIII approach, the ILS cannot be offset as it gives ground roll guidance. If it was offset the aircraft would follow the signal off the runway.
Bally Heck is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2001, 13:09
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 262
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Red face

TickleTackle

The ILS for 22R at JFK is not offset by 9°, but only by 3°, with the final approach course intersecting the extended centre line at 2,512 feet from the runway threshold.

Time for a new set of approach plates.
Bellerophon is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2001, 15:25
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Scotland
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

ILS for 08 at the Isle of Man is offset by I think 4 degrees because of terrain. Quite odd when you fly one for the first time.
towser is offline  
Old 15th Oct 2001, 18:01
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: min rest
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I recall, and please correct me if I am wrong, the IOM 08 ILs was put in as direct result of a UK CAA report into two (same day)seperate incidents of HS748 aircraft on Vor 08, early morning approaches, in fog.
These Vor approaches were to say the least "creative" as flow by the UK Atpl rated pilots, as to heights flown and at what points of the approach these heights were achieved. They were lucky.
This report makes a chilling read, and a valuable lesson in DME orientation.
The IOM and uk Caa are to be congratulated IMHO for sorting this approach situation out in under 18 months by putting in an ILs.and seeing if their legally fatigued pilots can follow that.
scanscanscan is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.