Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Why did no airline do this before?

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Why did no airline do this before?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Aug 2001, 12:36
  #1 (permalink)  
tva164
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post Why did no airline do this before?

United to Launch U.S.-India (Direct) Flights
Read the article here - http://biz.yahoo.com/apf/010814/united_india.html

Its a 7500 mile trip and takes 14/15 hours on the 744.

Would the route fly up North from VIDP over the pole and then due south towards KORD or would there be some other route, e.g., overNorthern Europe then the usual NATS way?

Any knowledgable sources?
 
Old 15th Aug 2001, 13:00
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Gatwick, UK
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

TVA164

The shortest route is over the pole, probably just to the North Atlantic side of it. There would be no need to use the NATs.


FPM.
FlightPlanMan is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2001, 14:21
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,914
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Looking at my globe and measuring with a piece of string, it looks like the route will be over Greenland, north of Norway, past Moscow and down over Afganistan- nothing unusual. It looks approximately similar or slightly less than BA's LHR-Singapore route, the effective max range for a 400 without restricting payload much and allowing for a headwind on the return sector.
Notso Fantastic is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2001, 22:43
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: LTN uk
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

not sure as i don't have the charts in front of me but, would that route not fly directly through the compass unreliable zone? is this not a factor with gps/sat nav/acars etc ? just asking as i never get to do that kind'a stuff ?


[ 15 August 2001: Message edited by: BOEINGBOY1 ]
BOEINGBOY1 is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2001, 23:02
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: 40 West
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

Boeingboy1 - what on earth has ACARS got to do with it ?
The Skylord is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2001, 04:07
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

GPS works fine up there! If you forget to flip the Heading Reference switch from Magnetic to True, the airplane (744) will do it for you!

Last time I did it, ACARS and HF worked fine!
Intruder is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2001, 21:12
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

Does anybody know about payload restrictions on DEL-ORD? 11:15am dep with mean summer temps @ 40+C around noon?
10/28 is 9300ft, 09/27 9500ft?

Any 744 drivers?
Cheers,
InitRef
InitRef is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2001, 03:50
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Columbus, Ohio, USA
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

If you're in HF range (and if you're in the solar system, you are) then it's technically possible to get HF based data link. If you have the right boxes in the ship, you'll get the messages on the little ACARS/AFIS whatever screen you usually get such messages on. Knowwhatahmean?
bizjet pilot is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2001, 06:51
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UTC +8
Posts: 2,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

OK, and after sitting on an airplane 15 hours you will not know where you've been and it wouldn't matter where you get off, because you wouldn't be functional for the next two days anyway.
GlueBall is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2001, 07:37
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

InitRef:

Last I checked (bored over the Pacific several months ago), the 744 with GE CF6-80C2B5F engines can take off at max GTOW (398.9 Tonnes) at 40 deg C at any airport normally served by the 744 (I believe Quito was an exception, but it never gets to 40 deg there). Other engines may impose restrictions.
Intruder is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2001, 09:20
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 347
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

TVA164 and Flight plan man,
Have a look at http://gc.kls2.com it gives great circle route depictions and distances.
(Intrigueing site). ORD-DEL is 6516nm and tracks over the east coast of Hudsons Bay, across Northern Baffin Island, Northern Greenland and just east of Novaya Zemlaya (sp) and to DEL.
innuendo is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2001, 09:46
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Melbourne - Australia
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Great Circle Map

[ 17 August 2001: Message edited by: Lurk R ]
Lurk R is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2001, 12:40
  #13 (permalink)  
tva164
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Here's the image - same thing as the URL above.

 
Old 17th Aug 2001, 20:24
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: California, USA
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Just a couple of comments:

UA's -400s use the P&W 4056 engines

UA uses satelite based datalink - not HF

And yes, it is a very loooong flight...
aviator is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2001, 22:28
  #15 (permalink)  
Hung start
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
fish

TVA164,

Nice link. But who´s correct about the distance? You say 7483nm, Inuendo says 6516nm.
That´s a hell of a difference.
 
Old 17th Aug 2001, 22:52
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 347
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

I think the site defaults to statute miles. I selected NM when I selected the two airports. The image depicted does not say NM.
innuendo is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2001, 22:56
  #17 (permalink)  
tva164
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Actually, thanks go to Innuendo and LurkR for the links.

Innuendo you are spot on here. It defaults to statute miles and if you select nautical miles, the number is about 6503 as you reported earlier. Also, mind you it will get longer once the route is recalculated using airways - as such it seems the route would take the aircraft through a lot of "restricted" airspace so deviations are bound to be factored in. An example would be while overflying the Hindukush region - expect a lot of zig-zag headings there. Russia might prove similarly long. Any more ideas here?

A follow on question - without poring through endless charts, is there anyway to map the route using airways? Any pilots or flight ops personnel familiar with the regions the flight path would take?

Cheers.

[edited to acknowledge Innuendo's finding]

[ 17 August 2001: Message edited by: TVA164 ]
 
Old 17th Aug 2001, 23:20
  #18 (permalink)  
tva164
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Same route, topo view, and distance in NM.

 
Old 18th Aug 2001, 08:12
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 347
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Canada 3000 are apparently planning YYZ and YVR to Delhi with an A-340.
Great circle from yvr is 6040nm, yyz 6309nm.
YVR to HKG is 5550 give or take and a full load of 284 pax meant max t/o weight of 275k using Macao as an alternate so I would guess that full payload may not be available. The Great Circle site gives EWR to HKG as around 7000 nm which Continental and United were/are doing so obviously the DEL route is feasable. Interesting that you can do ORD and YYZ using 180 mins etops according to the chart. I have no experience of engine out terrain clearance routings in the area of the Himalayas and I wonder if this would impact on the DEL outbound routings? Some body here must know.
innuendo is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2001, 02:16
  #20 (permalink)  
tva164
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

I think this route is pretty interesting because of these:-

1. It flies almost right over the north pole (heading would change from the 350s to 010s as you see it (probably, I'm only guesstimating)
2. It slices down the middle of Russia direct towards the Himalayan range, again, interesting terrain...

Any more?
 


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.