Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Could a 757-200 land on a runway 2600 ft long?

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Could a 757-200 land on a runway 2600 ft long?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Oct 2000, 18:45
  #21 (permalink)  
Brenoch
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Talking

We pull those stunts once in a while on the ferries to amuse our selfs.. Doing one tomorrow..
 
Old 25th Oct 2000, 13:20
  #22 (permalink)  
ZK-NSJ
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

well here in christchurch,nz
a air nz 744 comes in from tokyo on
sundays,and then departs for auckland
quarter full, runway length is 3250m,
this bird gets airborne in 1200m.
(around 3600ft if i'm correct).
 
Old 28th Oct 2000, 02:11
  #23 (permalink)  
near enuf is good enuf
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

This straight from BOEING FORUM:

757 PERFORMS IN CHALLENGING ENVIRONMENTS
....."Although it is the largest Boeing single aisle model, it can operate on the shortest of runways. Currently it serves the Yichang, China, airport with its 5,250 foot (1,600 mtr) runway and the 5,577 foot (1,698 mtr) runway at Funchal on the Atlantic island of Madeira."

If it were operating into anything shorter I'm sure they would have it in black and white.
I think the guys have answered the "can" but I don't think it ever would.

------------------
So that you may not be the martyred slaves of Time,
get drunk, get drunk,
and never pause for rest!
With wine, poetry, or virtue,
as you choose!"
 
Old 28th Oct 2000, 15:02
  #24 (permalink)  
Bally Heck
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Question

Martin Kareng.

Don't leave us in suspense!!! Dish the dirt. A Britannia 757. Where? When? Why has the Daily Crud not heard of it? Just gimme da facts. Only da facts!
 
Old 30th Oct 2000, 21:02
  #25 (permalink)  
Brenoch
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

near enuf is good enuf: There is a new runway at Funchal now thank god.. 2700mts.. Makes it alot more undramatic flying in there..
 
Old 31st Oct 2000, 02:34
  #26 (permalink)  
buck-rogers
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Ah Funchal!

A small ski ramp bolted to the cliffs I remember. A bit cheeky saying that '75s are good aircraft becouse they land there -(even though they are). There's a big chunk of gravity helping you stop on that slope.

Without a headwind I do remember a short load of fuel helped you to skip to a nearby island to get a full tank, and then you left properly.

I would love to have been on a landing/take off when it was the original, original runway - the one that didn't have the extension in the sea! I bet there was some real bum clenching moments in those days!

Is the new runway at the same location or have they found a different bit of the island that's flat now? Been a while.
 
Old 31st Oct 2000, 20:29
  #27 (permalink)  
Brenoch
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Talking

The new runway sits just next to the old one.. Ahh, good ol Porto Santo, gets a bit crowded when FNC closes.. Room for no more than five crafts on the apron..
 
Old 3rd Nov 2000, 00:10
  #28 (permalink)  
ironbutt57
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Talking

Physically possible..oh most definitely yes...but i want to be there with a video camera to watch it leave!!!!
 
Old 19th Nov 2000, 10:42
  #29 (permalink)  
4dogs
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Question

Brenoch,

The standard factor is 1.67. In some jurisdictions, an additional 15% is applied to aircraft without reverse thrust and some apply an additional 15% for wet runway. In any event, 1.92 is the result of applying the 15% to the 1.67 dry factor.

Can you confirm the derivation of the 1.92 factor to which you refer? Your previous reply did not really elucidate your original statement.

------------------
Stay Alive,

[email protected]


 
Old 30th Nov 2000, 17:37
  #30 (permalink)  
Brenoch
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

4Dogs.. Aye, you are right.. Overlooked it in the mist of battle.. 1.92=1.67*1.15 for the fact that reverse thrust is not used..
Please excuse my ignorance..
 
Old 1st Dec 2000, 11:11
  #31 (permalink)  
AndrewE
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

I know it might see impractible but in MSFS2000 i can land the 757 at meigs feild chicago at close to it's MLW with full brakes/reverse thrust/spoilers, slight breeze, and a dry runway.
I'm sure in real life you could land it on a 2400ft/runway assuming hte runway was dry....Then again..i stand corrected.....

------------------
Great Quotes:
"Flying is an unnatural act, probably punishable by God."

"London Heathrow has been described as the only building site to have its own airport."

"A good landing is one you can walk away from. A great landing is one you can still use the plane after."
 
Old 2nd Dec 2000, 12:44
  #32 (permalink)  
Johan Dees
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Wink

Not for long anymore Andrew...

FS2000 planes brake way too hard. Not real. Also the reversers give way too much braking.
For example; Most 747's can be land anywere, but not the one from my site. Braking is set to real values, and you need more runway to get to a stop.
Busy on the 757, and then Meigs will be a real challenge after that.

Johan
 
Old 4th Dec 2000, 19:05
  #33 (permalink)  
Doors to Automatic
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Unhappy

FS2000 aircraft are improving as we speak. The new 767s from project Opensky stop very realistically. 40% fuel, Aurobrake level 1 and full reverse requires around 6000-7000 feet to land and stop.
 
Old 5th Dec 2000, 16:32
  #34 (permalink)  
AndrewE
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

uh, Doors to Automatic, you might already know this but...the guy who replied just before you (Johan Dees) is the one who is actually making the flight dynamics for that very 767. He also made the dynamics for the Meljet 747

hehe
regards,

------------------
Great Quotes:
"Flying is an unnatural act, probably punishable by God."

"London Heathrow has been described as the only building site to have its own airport."

"A good landing is one you can walk away from. A great landing is one you can still use the plane after."
 
Old 5th Dec 2000, 17:36
  #35 (permalink)  
reverserdeployed
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Wink

 
Old 7th Dec 2000, 04:58
  #36 (permalink)  
Doors to Automatic
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Talking

Andrew,

Didn't actually know this - thanks for letting me know! To Johan - full marks for an excellent set of aircraft. The only thing that would make them better is to be able to have a wing-view from inside when you look left/right.

Rgds, D to A
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.