Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

a320,CAT3-engine out=Flaps full????

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

a320,CAT3-engine out=Flaps full????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Feb 2002, 10:11
  #21 (permalink)  
JMJ
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unhappy

CORRECTION.. .My previous post was in error,. .Just had a closer look at the MSN's on the bottom of the FCOM pages, our company operates both A320 and the A321 with more of both types arriving soon.. .The engine on the A320 is the IAE2527-A5.. .FCOM 3.01.22p4 AUTO LAND CAT11 & CAT111 approved in CONF3 & CONF FULL.. .FCOM 3.01.22p3 ENGINE OUT CAT11 & CAT111 fail passive autoland are only approved in CONF FULL, and if eng-out procedures completed before 1000ft.. .Sorry for the earlier bulls##t statement.
JMJ is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2002, 15:16
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Sunrise Senior Living
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angry

Blimey, what a dog's breakfast! Although we fly all CFM powered A320 and 321, the FCOMs issued are for the 321. I'll have a look at a 320 FCOM next time out in a 320. Anyone yet got enough info to draw this thread to a logical conclusion? I guess it's one for the base trainers!. .Cheers. .mcdhu
mcdhu is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2002, 15:45
  #23 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Blighty
Posts: 1,440
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Talking

Yeah seems as much doesn't it MCHDU, i reckon its as much type/engine specific and also on the updates of the FCOM you have. Bottom line, do what your ops manual/FCOM says.

BTW i fly 320 with CFM and 321 with IAE.
EGGW is offline  
Old 15th Feb 2002, 20:30
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Sunrise Senior Living
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angry

Possibly the last thread. Went flying today in a brand new A320 with CFM56 5B4P engines. From the Limitations Section of the FCOM in the ac, Engine out Cat2 and 3a limited to Config Full only. There doesn't seem to be any consistency in all this. Oh well, ours is not to reason why......... .Cheers. .mcdhu. .Still <img src="confused.gif" border="0">
mcdhu is offline  
Old 16th Feb 2002, 09:39
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

To summarise for A320/321 CAT II/III autoland;

Normal(CAT II/CAT III SINGLE/CAT III DUAL). .A320 approved CONF3 and CONF FULL. .A321 approved CONF3 and CONF FULL

Engine-out(CAT II/CAT III SINGLE)*. .A320 approved CONF FULL. .A321 approved CONF3 and CONF FULL

* Engine-out procedures complete before reaching 1000ft.

Clear as mud?!

mcdude
mcdude is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2002, 17:35
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Wish it was warmer
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Could the differences have something to do with the double-slotted flaps on the 321??
ColdnFoggy is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2002, 22:29
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

So its not your day..............you lose an engine, and you need to autoland !!. .config Full seems fine to me!

ps for the techies.......if you autoland single engine you are limited to idle reverse on an IAE powered 320......why?
Big-Pants is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2002, 23:03
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Below the line,

Think of what the autobrakes are giving you (decel rates), and what the effect of using reverse is ... does it change the decel rate ?

Autobrakes LOW 1.7m/s². .Autobrakes MED 3.0m/s². .Autobrakes MAX 6.0m/s²

So what to you achieve using asymmetric reverse in terms of decl rates, nothing. You actually will increase directional control problems, and increase brake wear (the carbon brakes increase wear when operated below 250 ºC) which is typical when reverse is used.

In an emergency the best option would be so set the park brake and lock the wheels up before thinking of going for reverse, at least you have a better chance of staying on the runway.

Z
Zeke is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2002, 06:21
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

"if you autoland single engine you are limited to idle reverse on an IAE powered 320......why? "

According to my FCOM only the A321 (IAE; not sure about CFM)has the IDLE reverse limitation with the additional limitation max crosswind 15kts. A320 does not have this limit.

My guess is it is a control issue with the longer fuselage?

mcdude (trying not to be techy...)
mcdude is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2002, 13:19
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Sunrise Senior Living
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

Yup, same limitation applies to the CFM powered 321!. .Cheers. .mcdhu
mcdhu is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2002, 00:21
  #31 (permalink)  
m&v
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: delta.bc.canada
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

So gentlemen,after two pages of chat-what's the answer??If one is performing an approach to Cat3 wx using config 3,and one loses the proverbial engine-Why does one have to revert to config'full'????It's stated so in the limitation chapter!! Why are full flap required???. . The only reason (I can figure) is that the A/p might have more 'control'with config full.Shades of dragonAire's HongKong?? Incident?????

A 90 degree g/slope will give you the least rollout!!
m&v is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2002, 00:24
  #32 (permalink)  
m&v
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: delta.bc.canada
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

So gentlemen,after two pages of chat-what's the answer??If one is performing an approach to Cat3 wx using config 3,and one loses the proverbial engine-Why does one have to revert to config'full'????It's stated so in the limitation chapter!! Why are full flap required???. . The only reason (I can figure) is that the A/p might have more 'control'with config full.Shades of dragonAire's HongKong?? Incident?????

A 90 degree g/slope will give you the least rollout!!
m&v is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.