Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner)
Reload this Page >

757 Gear problem out of Linate yesterday (BA569)?

Wikiposts
Search
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

757 Gear problem out of Linate yesterday (BA569)?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Jun 2003, 18:53
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question 757 Gear problem out of Linate yesterday (BA569)?

Not quite sure where to post this:

While wakeboarding yesterday (05/06/03) evening at the Idroscalo in Milan I couldn’t help but notice the BA569 757 departing. And what a beautiful sight it was (757 = sexiest plane to have taken to the skies). But what really caught my attention was the fact it disappeared off into the distance with the undercarriage lowered. It was still lowered when it was an indistinguishable dot in the distance.

Would there be any reason for this? Was it done intentionally or was there a "glitch"? Could the crew or anyone drop a line to let us know, coz I’m dying of curiosity.

Thanks in advance for any replies, w.
Winkiepinkie is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2003, 20:25
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Camp X-Ray
Posts: 2,135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Could have been any number of reasons. Can't speak for the 757 but on the Airbus it's not uncommon to leave the gear down due to failed wheel tacheometers (allows the wheels to stop spinning before the gear goes up) or to cool hot brakes if there are no brake fans fitted. If there really was a serious glitch I suspect the aircraft would either have returned to LIN fairly soon or diverted to MXP where there may have been more engineering cover.
Hand Solo is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2003, 20:58
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yup, if a brake is capped off on the 757 then the gear needs to be left down on take off for a period of time (can't find the referance right now). Incidentally this causes a serious performance degradation, of 10 tonnes or so !
expedite_climb is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2003, 22:33
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: TTPP
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Snoop

A relatively rare occasion, but if you live near an airport you're quite likely to see that every now and then. Sometime last week I saw an Alitalia 777 performing what appeared to be a normal SID out of 16R at Fiumicino with all hanging down. You mentioned about a perfomance degradation, well on the 777 those bogies look immensely saggy \o/ \o/ Imagine the drag.

Alitalia has just recieved the 777 and they seem to do quite a bit of traning at night fliying normal and abnormal circuits around the airport. Is flying the aircraft 'dirty' part of any airline training programme?
chock2chock is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2003, 23:19
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes and no.

If you are doing circuit training the wheels get spun up every time you land which heats them, and then the brakes are applied as you gear up, when the gear goes into the wells.

When I was base training every few circuits the gear was left down until downwind for cooling purposes - so yes its fairly standard when training, but not for a training purpose !
expedite_climb is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2003, 23:36
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tracy Island
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MEL & DDG 32-41-1 B757-200 After TOF the gear must remain extended for a minimum of 2 minutes. Flaps 15 2nd segment penalty is 14.3 tonnes
FEBA is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2003, 19:44
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Hungary
Age: 39
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
14.3 tonnes of what? I dont quite understand the answer.
Tonic Please is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2003, 20:14
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: In front of a computer
Posts: 2,363
Received 98 Likes on 40 Posts
Maximum Take-off Weight. A performance penalty means reducing the load to retain safety margins - 14 tonnes would be...lets see...all the passengers!!!
ETOPS is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2003, 20:15
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Hungary
Age: 39
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gosh! So I guess you just stay on the ground, wait for the wheel wells to cool, and then go, to save leaving the passengers behind?
Tonic Please is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2003, 02:05
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tonic, no I think you are confusing two issues here.

The gear is often left down on circuit training to cool the gear.

The issue here is (probably) something different - to do with brakes capped / de-activated due to a fault / leak.

On a normal take off the brakes are automatically applied as the gear is retracted, this is so the wheels are not spinning as they go into the bay.

If a brake is capped off that particular wheel may still spin after take off, so the gear must be left down for min 2 minutes to allow the wheels to stop spinning. This procedure would mean the MTOW is reduced by 14.3 tonnes.

The other option is wait until the engineers come from from base to fix the leaky brake - a long option.

I don't know about performance out of LIN, but from Italy back to LHR I suspect that performance would not have been an issue at all and they may have even got away without leaving any bags behind. (It's an overpowered beast....) To give you an idea, anti skid inop is a similar performance problem (13 tonnes degradation), and I made it make from SSH (Sharm - el - Sheik) to LGW a few months ago no problem....
expedite_climb is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2003, 02:15
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tracy Island
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Expedite
I would suspect that Tonic Please is a journo' looking for some easy info to misconstrue. I would recommend that he be confused no longer.
FEBA
FEBA is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2003, 02:30
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Hungary
Age: 39
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FEBA...

I am not what you say. I am 18, living at home with parents, with many achievements under my belt. Not a journo, so please, do not jump to conclusions. I think I have a good reputation around here for trying to learn things, and you ask questions in order to do that.
Tonic Please is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2003, 02:52
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tracy Island
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am reassured. Thankyou
FEBA
FEBA is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2003, 02:53
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Hungary
Age: 39
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am at a loss to see how you came to your conclusion anyhow, but not to worry.

Dan
Tonic Please is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2003, 07:21
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't worry Tonic. It's the standard response on here from some quarters to anyone asking a question. If you don't understand how things work then you must be a "journo" (i.e. a very bad person) asking for information and that is bad. Or, more likely, but not as bad - for nothing is as bad as a "journo", a terrorist.

Note how there are few people on here who try and understand the workings, motivations etc. of a "journo". Maybe they should ask for media training from their employers to find out.

Cue salvos accusing me of being a "journo". The most base of all insults on this board.
Banana99 is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2003, 07:40
  #16 (permalink)  

Manchesters Most Wanted PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

Banana99 = journo
bagpuss lives is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2003, 02:08
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tracy Island
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tonic Please
Maybe they should ask for media training from their employers to find out.
I would recommend you take up Banana's advice , I'm sure the two of will will make fine journo's.
Good luck
FEBA
FEBA is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2003, 19:04
  #18 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks you lot.

Just the answers I was looking for.
Winkiepinkie is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2003, 22:07
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: ME
Posts: 5,502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would guess that we have this MEL at least once a week, it really isnt a big deal but unfortunately it looks unusual and therefore stirs an immense amount of interest

Mutt.
mutt is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2003, 00:28
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Hungary
Age: 39
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FEBA. I dont understand your tone Are you purposely trying to create an atmosphere of sarcasm towards me and banana99 ?

Just curious.

Dan
Tonic Please is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.