Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner)
Reload this Page >

Logging different aircraft types

Wikiposts
Search
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

Logging different aircraft types

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Oct 2017, 09:35
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: SE England
Posts: 687
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Logging different aircraft types

I'm not a spotter but, if "a friend" was keeping a list of aircraft types flown what would you all count as different types?

Would a 737-200 be different from a 737-300 as pretty much different aircraft?
Would a 737-300 be different from a 737-400 as variants of the same type?
How about DC9/MD80/B717?
F28 vs F100?
Then there are light aircraft C150, C152 are fairly close, but with different names, PA28-160 is fairly different from PA28-161 to fly.

How do you all define a new type?
Dan Dare is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2017, 09:52
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: NI
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not being a pilot I usually rely on the ICAO. If they have allocated a separate designator then that inidicates there is sufficient difference in performance ( for ATC ) or ground-ops that a distinction is required.

For example separate C150 and C152 designators were issued on account of the change, I believe, from the Continental to Lycoming engine and related change in carb-icing behaviour which might affect how they can maintain an altitude. However no disctinction was made between the Commuter and Aerobat variants, though those would be quite different for a pilot!

On the other hand both the 777F and 777-200LR are classed as B77L since they both fly the same and have identical apron profiles, though that might surprise a handling team at the destination who turned-up with steps for the freighter.
El Bunto is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2017, 13:28
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 3,230
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 10 Posts
I’ve logged every one for what it was eg Pa28-140/160/180 and so on.
But counted as only one type.
You generally don’t count the variants.
Unless they’ve had significant modifications.
Under FAA rules of it has a different Type Certificate Data Sheet it will officially be a different type.
I suspect though that the “ace of the base” types count all variants as different types.
B2N2 is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2017, 15:04
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: world
Posts: 3,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In my passenger log I differentiate NEW TYPEs with NEW SUB TYPEs. But, for some of the reasons given above, even that isn't always crystal clear. I guess you just have to make your own rules as you go along!
Hotel Tango is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2017, 15:18
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: SE England
Posts: 687
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'm not talking a flying logbook here, but when people have flown (in) 500 types have they counted Reims F172 as a different type from Cessna 172? They are differentiated in the ICAO Docs. There is a very grey line sometimes between a variant and a type. As it would be for an unofficial log I'm more interested in what others do as there can be no correct answer.
Dan Dare is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2017, 15:28
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: world
Posts: 3,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A passenger log is not an official logbook, so now you've lost me
Hotel Tango is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2017, 17:33
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,822
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
Originally Posted by Dan Dare
I'm not talking a flying logbook here, but when people have flown (in) 500 types have they counted Reims F172 as a different type from Cessna 172? They are differentiated in the ICAO Docs. There is a very grey line sometimes between a variant and a type. As it would be for an unofficial log I'm more interested in what others do as there can be no correct answer.
It's an impossible question to answer, some differentiations will matter to some people, but not to others. For instance your Cessna examples share the same ICAO code - that's good enough for ATC.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2017, 18:12
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: S Warwickshire
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would think Eric Brown's list would set a good example!
Mark 1 is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2017, 21:03
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 3,230
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by Mark 1
I would think Eric Brown's list would set a good example!
I just read his wiki page, what an amazing person.
B2N2 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.