Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner)
Reload this Page >

Concorde dangling the dunlops


Notices
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

Concorde dangling the dunlops

Old 12th July 2002 | 10:28
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: U.K.
Concorde dangling the dunlops

My first post but only because "New Bloke" got lost during the last server move.

I saw Concord over Croydon yesterday at about 18:30 with the gear down. Heck of a racket as quite a bit of power was being used. Whats the gossip then?
Old New Bloke is offline  
Old 12th July 2002 | 10:31
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
From: London, UK
It's called "landing"...an often-used procedure which aircraft adopt at the end of a flight.

The noise comes from devices called "engines" which assist the aircraft in completing its journey.

Croydon is located near Heathrow Airport, a favourite destination for Concorde flights.
Konkordski is offline  
Old 12th July 2002 | 10:41
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: U.K.
Doh

For the pedants, It was pointing AWAY from Heathrow, it was at about 5/6000' and was NOT landing.

If it had been landing I wouldn't have asked the question now would I ?
Old New Bloke is offline  
Old 12th July 2002 | 10:41
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
From: London, UK
Actually now that I think about it, isn't Concorde usually due in from NY at around 21:00 rather than 18:30?

Modification test flight?
Konkordski is offline  
Old 12th July 2002 | 10:52
  #5 (permalink)  

Usual disclaimers apply!
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 843
Likes: 0
From: EGGW
Konkordski wins the prize for the correct guess
gas path is offline  
Old 12th July 2002 | 10:59
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: U.K.
Ahhh So

So that was it.

About a couple of hours later we saw another (same one?) going the same way (East) and about 2/3000' higher than the first.

Why wasn't the gear raised the first time it came over, would this be due to some tests that were being carried out?

We had a 20-over Cricket match yesterday evening so much of my time was spent spotting. I just added that as I don't want anyone to think I hang arond Croydon with my notebook
Old New Bloke is offline  
Old 12th July 2002 | 11:18
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: Bedfordshire
nothing wrong with croydon mate, actually, sorry, nothing right with croydon... mind you even when landing on 27 a/c may still pass over croydon at 3/4000ft heading east before they turn back to lhr...
No comment is offline  
Old 12th July 2002 | 12:03
  #8 (permalink)  

PPRuNe Bashmeister
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
From: Essex UK
Talking

Old NB


I find it very difficult to concentrate on the game when playing cricket near an airfield or under a SID or STAR.

Only last week while playing at a lovely little Hertfordshire village a mile or so north of the approach to Luton, I must have spent as much time watching to see what aircraft types and companies were flying in as I spent searching the hedgerows for the sixes and fours that went whistling past me.

It could be psychological though: as a kid I was standing in the middle of a cricket square when a Hawker Hunter dived into the deck only 300 yards away after the pilot ejected at 12000ft or so.

Even since then I have looked up on hearing any type of aircraft engine - even when batting.

Despite this handicap when playing last week I got a few wickets and runs and did stop a few balls from being belted to the boundary.

Last edited by Stan Sted; 12th July 2002 at 17:30.
Stan Sted is offline  
Old 12th July 2002 | 12:25
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: essex
You lot leave Croydon alone!After all it's the home town of the mighty EAGLES![CPFC for those not educated in the finer points of english football!]
essexeng is offline  
Old 12th July 2002 | 12:34
  #10 (permalink)  

Rainbow Chaser
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
From: At home, mostly!
It was a sheer joy for me who lives under the Biggin Stack to have a double-dose of Concorde at 1830-ish last night (and the night before 'cos I was walking the dog) as well as the later arrival (usually about 2125) - whatever the mod on the earlier flight it seemed a darn sight noisier than usual which is great because it meant that folks who are usually too daft to look at aircraft in flight actually did so!! YAY!!!



brockenspectre is offline  
Old 12th July 2002 | 12:37
  #11 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: U.K.
Hi Stan

Yes I remember you telling me that, wasn't that the pitch that is now over the M25?

I ended up out 2nd ball to a dodgy lbw and 1 wicket off the last over (stumped off of a wide)

I still don't know why the gear would be down even if it was landing on 27. Surley the gear wouldn't be down until finals???
Old New Bloke is offline  
Old 12th July 2002 | 13:06
  #12 (permalink)  
PPRuNe Pop
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
As a matter of fact ONB I saw the same Concorde at 1812, but at Mitcham, quite close to Croydon. Indeed the gear was down and I saw it turn on to finals at about 14/18 miles.

BA 2 has been landing at 2105 (ish) but used to land at about 1720 (ish). The second JFK might just about be ready to start - maybe, PERHAPS!
 
Old 12th July 2002 | 14:38
  #13 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: U.K.
Thanks for that Pop.

(I couldn't get my old name back no matter how I tried!!!!)

Old New Bloke is offline  
Old 12th July 2002 | 16:26
  #14 (permalink)  
NW1
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: UK
All correct - it was G-BOAC fresh out from her airworthiness mods and on a shake-down flight - first time she'd had air under her wings since the grounding and great to have her back (now the earliest Conc. in service in order of production - #204). Well earned beer for all those engineers - thanks guys. The 002 would have arrived a couple of hours or so later on the temporary later timing.

The "regular" 002 timing (1725 local arrival LHR) should resume in August (as will a weekend BGI schedule for that month), the late schedule being necessary to avoid nightstopping an airframe in JFK until we have enough back in service, 'AC should provide that when her release to service is complete.

As for double daily - we're still waiting on the decision, but in should be in the forseeable...... G-BOAB will take G-BOAC's place in the hangar....
NW1 is offline  
Old 12th July 2002 | 17:52
  #15 (permalink)  
ENTREPPRUNEUR
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
From: The 60s
dangling the dunlops

That'll be the Michelin Dunlops...
twistedenginestarter is offline  
Old 12th July 2002 | 18:48
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 1998
Posts: 945
Likes: 0
From: 18m N of LGW
Just a mixing the metaphors. Dangling the Michelins doesn't sound as good does it.



InFinRetirement is offline  
Old 13th July 2002 | 08:17
  #17 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 328
Likes: 16
From: Finland
OOI could they still build a new Concorde if they wanted to ? I.e. are all the bits 'commercially available' if not a bit old? Or would they need to use new bits that would require certification all over again ?
luoto is offline  
Old 13th July 2002 | 15:43
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 8,266
Likes: 1
From: Berkshire, UK
I fell off the chair when I read the comment about it going the wrong way. Reminds me of a BA bloke some years ago.... heading 090 downwind for 27s. I said "24 miles from touchdown" he said "but my DME says 12 miles"... I said "but you're going the wrong way!

It would be unlikely in the extreme for a Heathrow inbound to be heading east over Croydon at 3-4000 ft. Maybe 4000, but even that would be unlikely.. more like 5-6000. We're not usually allowed to descend below 4000 ft until a/c are within 13nm of touchdown.
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 13th July 2002 | 16:51
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 1998
Posts: 945
Likes: 0
From: 18m N of LGW
Ummmm..quite agree HD. I didn't notice that height assessment had been used, and I would agree that it was nearer 6000' - hard to be precise of course.

Still, the sight was all that mattered.
InFinRetirement is offline  
Old 13th July 2002 | 18:50
  #20 (permalink)  

Rainbow Chaser
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
From: At home, mostly!
Cool

All I know is that I wish the +/- 9.20pm arrival would make its turn onto LHR approach a little more westward so if I am not out I don't have to lean across my sink and half out of my kitchen window (to the curiosity of neighbours and folks passing by)!! OK so once she is heading 270 and beginning descent I can see her but she is too far away then!!!

So HD can you fix it for her northerly track prior to the turn be a mile more eastward please?!!

brockenspectre is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.