Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner)
Reload this Page >

Falcon 8X approved for London City

Wikiposts
Search
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

Falcon 8X approved for London City

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th May 2017, 18:51
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Going left then going right
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Falcon 8X approved for London City

Le nouveau Dassault Falcon 8X agréé pour le London City Airport

A true flagship of the Dassault fleet, the Falcon 8X, a very long-range trijet, has obtained approval to operate on the London City Airport, one of the most difficult airports in the world.

With a range of 11,945 km, the Falcon 8X is the longest-range model of the manufacturer and allows to reach Los Angeles or Hong Kong to London without stopovers.

Dassault Aviation is the only business aircraft manufacturer with the entire fleet in production authorized to operate at this airport, including the Falcon 7X and 900LX trijet and the 2000S / LXS jets. Located in the heart of the London business district, the London City Airport has one of the most restricted approach profiles and one of the strictest sound regulations in the aviation industry.

"This aircraft's ability to land and take off from London City, as well as other hard-to-reach airports, allows our customers to measure flexibility and operational strength," said Eric Trappier, CEO of Dassault Aviation. He adds, "Airport performance is one of the flagship design priorities of Dassault Falcon."

Featuring superior short track capabilities, the Falcon 8X boasts a unique digital flight control system, a silent cab and a range of unmatched configurations within the aviation industry. Combined with the new Dassault FalconEye combined vision system, the first head-up display system, the crew has enhanced synthetic features.
nohold is offline  
Old 7th May 2017, 22:19
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,822
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
A true flagship of the Dassault fleet, the Falcon 8X, a very long-range trijet, has obtained approval to operate on the London City Airport, one of the most difficult airports in the world.
I'm surprised that it needed specific approval.

The Falcon 8X is simply the marketing designation for Falcon 7X aircraft from msn 401 onwards. The 7X has been approved for LCY since 2009.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 8th May 2017, 13:54
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Middle Earth
Posts: 899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
I'm surprised that it needed specific approval.

The Falcon 8X is simply the marketing designation for Falcon 7X aircraft from msn 401 onwards. The 7X has been approved for LCY since 2009.
The 8X is 2ft 66 longer than the 7X, the wingspan of the 8X is 0.23ft longer and the 8X is 0.56ft taller than the 7X

Due to the slightly larger size, it needs specific approval

FC
Fried_Chicken is offline  
Old 8th May 2017, 14:44
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Going left then going right
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks FC, due to its size the F8X also has two additional passenger windows (16 in total).
nohold is offline  
Old 9th May 2017, 06:49
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,822
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
Originally Posted by Fried_Chicken
The 8X is 2ft 66 longer than the 7X, the wingspan of the 8X is 0.23ft longer and the 8X is 0.56ft taller than the 7X
I'm not disputing that (though the stretch is actually a tad over a meter, around 4 feet, hence the two extra windows per side), just commenting that the "8X" is purely a marketing name, it's still a Falcon 7X as far as the Type Certificate is concerned.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 9th May 2017, 08:31
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,451
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Dave, for comparison consider the BAe 146 / Avro RJ. The initial certification for the 146-200 / RJ85 at LCY (actually a general steep approach capability at any airport) was not acceptable for the 146-300 / RJ100 because of small differences in aircraft capability during the approach, even though the aircraft have the same type certificate.
The certification margins for a steep approach are small. Several aircraft types have had to make physical changes or involve new operating technique in order to comply.
The larger 146/RJ aircraft certification differed in approach angle and tailwind approval (6 deg - 5.5 deg, 5 kts - 0 kts); thus if the 7x was near or at a limit, then recertification for the 8x would be understandable.
safetypee is offline  
Old 9th May 2017, 18:54
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought City lost most of its business jet traffic years ago due to very high fees and a lack of parking.
LTNman is online now  
Old 9th May 2017, 23:01
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Geneva, Switzerland
Age: 58
Posts: 1,909
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by LTNman
I thought City lost most of its business jet traffic years ago due to very high fees and a lack of parking.
Actually was about to ask about the relevance of this certification. Bizjet in City is anecdotic.
atakacs is offline  
Old 10th May 2017, 06:46
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,451
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
...the relevance of this certification.
Because as an EASA certification it approves the aircraft to operate at any airport / runway with a GS angle greater than 4.5 deg. Sion, Lugano?, ...
safetypee is offline  
Old 10th May 2017, 07:17
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,659
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by LTNman
I thought City lost most of its business jet traffic years ago due to very high fees and a lack of parking.
It did. Most disappointing. The days when 6 or more aircraft were parked at the Jet Centre are long gone. Nowadays one is common, and quite often none at all. There's just as much space there as there used to be.
WHBM is offline  
Old 10th May 2017, 07:30
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Europe
Posts: 167
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
I'm not disputing that (though the stretch is actually a tad over a meter, around 4 feet, hence the two extra windows per side), just commenting that the "8X" is purely a marketing name, it's still a Falcon 7X as far as the Type Certificate is concerned.
Dave, I agree that F8X - as being a F7X - is type certificated for steep approach (obviously, if the required modification is installed). From my memory, the LCY case is a bit different as every aircraft sub-type has to prove that the specific LCY noise limits are not exceeded.
Bidule is offline  
Old 10th May 2017, 13:59
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Durham
Age: 79
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So what would be the range of the F8X departing from LCY, maybe not it's max range?
oldart is offline  
Old 10th May 2017, 17:34
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Geneva, Switzerland
Age: 58
Posts: 1,909
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by safetypee
...the relevance of this certification.
Because as an EASA certification it approves the aircraft to operate at any airport / runway with a GS angle greater than 4.5 deg. Sion, Lugano?, ...
Aha that's interesting! Thanks
atakacs is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.