Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner)
Reload this Page >

BA92 YYZ-LHR Diversion June 22

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

BA92 YYZ-LHR Diversion June 22

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th June 2016 | 20:43
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
BA92 YYZ-LHR Diversion June 22

BA92 (or 5CA), a B744 (G-CIVJ), departed Toronto Pearson (YYZ) at 2257Z on June 22, bound for London Heathrow (LHR). About an hour into the flight, they made a U-turn over Quebec Province and headed back towards Toronto. They requested 33R be made available at YYZ because they would be landing at "maximum weight". About 30 mins later, they decided to divert to Montreal Trudeau (YUL) and advised Montreal Centre that they carried certain cargo in a particular compartment - a configuration that was not acceptable to the company. I don't know if the cargo had to be offloaded or merely shifted. The aircraft landed at YUL at 0048Z. It took off for London at 0226Z and landed safely at LHR at 0842Z.
No mention of this diversion has been made by The Aviation Herald. BA Source mentions a "technical issue" but reports talk of a possible "security alert".
Does anyone have any more information on this rather costly diversion?
Rockhound is offline  
Reply
Old 24th June 2016 | 21:02
  #2 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: The Back of Beyond
So, basically, a non event. Please tell me why you posted this on this forum?
Flying Clog is offline  
Reply
Old 24th June 2016 | 21:41
  #3 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 472
Likes: 1
From: Potomac Heights
Come on. A rather unusual diversion and landing because of some cargo issue? It sounds interesting to me. Was it because of a HAZMAT fear? Lithium batteries? A bomb threat? Someone's dog being loaded without water? Any of these reasons would be of interest. I would say that the OP's question has certainly as much validity for entry into a R&N forum as the typical one. Inquiring minds would like to know.
SeenItAll is offline  
Reply
Old 24th June 2016 | 21:49
  #4 (permalink)  
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 17,687
Likes: 2,030
From: Reading, UK
Could well have an inadvertent contravention of IATA DG regulations, for example loading two incompatible classes in the same hold, discovered only after departure.

Might have got a bit more exciting if they hadn't diverted.

Other explanations are available.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Reply
Old 25th June 2016 | 11:32
  #5 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 37
From: England
Sounds like incompatible DGR loaded next to each other/in same hold to me
750XL is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.