Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

Saab 2000 engines?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th April 2016 | 07:52
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: Bangor (Gwynedd)
Saab 2000 engines?

Do my eyes deceive me, or are the engines on a Saab 2000 angled slightly to the right of the centreline of the aircraft (to counteract prop torque or something maybe)?

AdamThePassenger is offline  
Reply
Old 30th April 2016 | 12:50
  #2 (permalink)  
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 17,720
Likes: 2,086
From: Reading, UK
It's not unknown for single-engined aircraft to have the engine thrust line (and/or fin) offset to counteract torque, but it's normally only by a couple of degrees or so, and very difficult to detect visually.

I'm not aware of any multi-engined aircraft that have this feature, though I stand to be corrected.

There's a good hi-res photo of the Saab 2000 from underneath on Wikipedia Commons, if that helps:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...0_airplane.jpg
DaveReidUK is offline  
Reply
Old 30th April 2016 | 21:38
  #3 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,038
Likes: 0
From: NI
When SF340 airframes were converted to Erieye configuration one of the changes was to angle the engines slightly to starboard to counteract the effects of the dorsal canoe. I don't know if that trick was shared with the 2000, but it did have an FBW rudder so may have had the computer handling the effect of the longer fuselage and additional thrust.
El Bunto is offline  
Reply
Old 10th May 2016 | 13:00
  #4 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,581
Likes: 0
From: flyover country USA
The initial SF340 flight tests were with "straight" nacelles, which presented the usual characteristics of propwash swirl. I think three airframes were built this way, and (1983) one by one they were reworked with canted nacelles, angled about 2 or 3 degrees to the right.

I have no knowledge specific to the 2000 with its bigger engines, but this is the background.
barit1 is offline  
Reply
Old 10th May 2016 | 13:59
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: Scotland
No- that's the one that I was on last week that had 2 bounces before finally getting down somewhere in the very far north of the British Isles. Bounces must have twisted the engine mountings a wee bit.
NorthernChappie is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.