Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner)
Reload this Page >

Spanish Air Force disrupts BA Gibraltar landing

Wikiposts
Search
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

Spanish Air Force disrupts BA Gibraltar landing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Nov 2014, 08:06
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: londond
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Spanish Air Force disrupts BA Gibraltar landing

Spanish air force disrupts British Airways flight landing in Gibraltar - Telegraph
dmburns is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2014, 09:38
  #2 (permalink)  
Air Smolik
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I understand it was an "incident" though. But I can't find anything on AvHerald or anywhere ...
 
Old 4th Nov 2014, 09:48
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Or-E-Gun, USA
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BA is Flying WHAT?

If BA is using an A380 for the London-Gibraltar route, perhaps someone will please explain the economics for me. No, a mid-air collision is not a great idea, but ATC and the pilots dealt with the perhaps too close approach. SO help me, I cannot wrap my little brain around an A380 between London and Gibraltar. If that is a seriously important route for BA, perhaps they should have asked for an A380-3, similar to the short route, high-density that Boeing has made for the Japanese market. On a bad day, that flight cannot be more than 75 minutes, more like 50. WTF am I missing? Does BA really have that much traffic to Gibraltar, or are they still 'testing and proving?" Obviously, I'm missing something. Thanks.
No Fly Zone is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2014, 09:50
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: England
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, you're missing about two hours of flight time and that it is a stock photo.
Lord Spandex Masher is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2014, 09:52
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: on the golf course (Covid permitting)
Posts: 2,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NFZ

I think your problem is in believing that the reporters have knowledge or care about accurate reporting. Journalist to back room stooge - photo os an aircraft in BA colours required pronto.
TopBunk is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2014, 09:52
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: ashton in makerfield
Posts: 79
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GIB.

I don't think it was an A380. In fact I am pretty sure it was not an A380. the picture was an A380 , but then this is a newspaper article and picture, and they don't have a clue and cannot tell one aircraft from another. Almost certainly was and A320 (family ) aircraft.
gsky is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2014, 09:55
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: In transit
Age: 70
Posts: 3,052
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's piss poor journalism, stock photo or not. They must have a stock photo of a 320 or whatever BA use on that route.
Capetonian is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2014, 09:59
  #8 (permalink)  
Air Smolik
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
It was A320

It was Airbus A320 (G-EUYB) and you can see the exact route here 👉 BA490 - British Airways - Flight history - Flightradar24
 
Old 4th Nov 2014, 10:32
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK.
Posts: 4,390
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
the presence of a Spanish air force jet, . . . . . a Lockheed P3 Orion
I guess we did once call them 'jetprops'.
I believe it's usually an A320.
There's no reason why an 'inappropriate' aircraft should not be used on two or three hour sectors when the training load is high, although an A380 wouldn't be a great idea at Gib for a couple of reasons.
Basil is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2014, 10:35
  #10 (permalink)  
Pegase Driver
 
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Europe
Age: 74
Posts: 3,694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Air Traffic Control (ATC) were in contact with both aircraft and the British Airways plane diverted in accordance with standard ATC procedures.
There was at no time any risk to safety."
End of the story. The rest is just hot air to push a political agenda.
ATC Watcher is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2014, 10:36
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Florida and wherever my laptop is
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Capetonian
It's piss poor journalism, stock photo or not. They must have a stock photo of a 320 or whatever BA use on that route.
Only A320 and A319 operate out of Gibraltar. I doubt whether an A380 could land on such a short runway, it almost certainly would not be able to take off again.
Ian W is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2014, 10:46
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: CYUL
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Journalists are so stupid and inaccurate in their reporting these days.

It's all about sensationalism and money… It does not matter if what they are reporting is correct or not as long as it sells.
Jet Jockey A4 is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2014, 10:48
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: In transit
Age: 70
Posts: 3,052
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I remember watching Vanguards appear to be struggling to take off from that runway, obviously they weren't, but as a casual observer it looked as if they used every inch of runway. I believe it's been extended since the 80s.
Capetonian is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2014, 10:56
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: finland
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
British Airways (BA) #490 ? 03-Nov-2014 ? EGLL / LHR - LXGB / GIB ? FlightAware

A320
Doma is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2014, 11:08
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1601
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Spanish Air Force disrupts BA Gibraltar landing

I think an A380 to GIB would require the pax to perform an air drop, not sure the rock could welcome the A380 without some.......reworking
TOWTEAMBASE is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2014, 11:17
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A journo used the wrong pic. Shock horror,!

Is that the only aspect of this story that merits discussion?
ShotOne is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2014, 11:18
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,822
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
I believe it's usually an A320.
And Friday's BA490 was no exception.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2014, 11:20
  #18 (permalink)  
ImageGear
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
A320-232 at 3000' heading 270 normal approach around the bay for RW09 (6000'), vectored away onto 160, 8 miles south of Algeciras, before repositioning on original inbound track. Looks like a fairly sharp avoidance.
 
Old 4th Nov 2014, 11:30
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Brighton
Posts: 972
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
I believe it's been extended since the 80s.
No, it has been this length since the 60s or earlier.
kenparry is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2014, 04:22
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Heathrow
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quote " A journo used the wrong pic. Shock horror,!

Is that the only aspect of this story that merits discussion?"


Yes I tend to agree with that, airline was BA, stock photo was BA ! Would we be complaining if for example there was a story about "Starbucks", the story includes a stock photo of a Starbucks sign in London, yet the story is about a Starbucks in Birmingham, Eagle eyed or local people may spot that the photo was taken in London but 99.9% will not ! does it really matter anyway as the story was about a BA plane not a specific type of plane (other coffee shops available ..lol)

PS, why am I not able to quote on here I dont seem to have the required button !
Dockwell is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.