Wikiposts
Search
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

Turbo Prop go around

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Jul 2014, 21:18
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: se england
Posts: 1,580
Likes: 0
Received 48 Likes on 21 Posts
Turbo Prop go around

I have been lucky enough to have to fly quite abit with my job, as I like aviation that's a plus.

Mostly flown on mainline jets but have always enjoyed the occasional trip on a turbo prop inc Viscount , F27/F50 Dash 7/8s and ATRs .

Turbo props can do col things like very short landings , very steep take offs, reversing on the runway to get every available foot of take of run (Anguilla) and I know they can control speed when slowing for an approach far better than jets can.
One thing , which I have not experienced though is what happens when a TP crew face a go around? I know that around 1500-100 ft on approach TPs go into fine pitch with a big change in engine note and what feels like quite an increase in revolutions.
So if we get to say 100 feet and a cow , pig , donkey. child on bicycle suddenly appears on the runway (since TPs often go to places where these things happen) what does the crew do , I don't think there is a TOGA button , or is there, I presume the intent is the same as on a jet, pitch up, incease power and clean up as it accelerates but how is that achieved with respect to the engines. Sorry for asking such a basic question but the thought struck me and has puzzled me all day.
Thanks
PB
I have experienced rather more than my share of jet go arounds but it never yet happened to me on a prop
pax britanica is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2014, 21:30
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,822
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
I know that around 1500-100 ft on approach TPs go into fine pitch with a big change in engine note and what feels like quite an increase in revolutions.
Exactly. That means that if you need to go around, simply coarsening the pitch (with a consequent increase in fuel flow) will give you all the additional power you need, without any necessity to wait for the engine to spool up.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2014, 21:36
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: England
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How does that explain the Q400 and Reduced Np?
Lord Spandex Masher is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2014, 23:16
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Colchester
Age: 40
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Turbo Prop go around

The Reduced NP on the Mighty Q tells the FADEC that you want to come in with lower power settings to sneak up on said cows and pigs. The condition levers are set already in the 1020rpm range and the FADEC is instructing the governors to maintain 850(or 900 if you're weird)rpm UNLESS the power levers are advanced above 50% torque. Then you get an automatic increase to 1020rpm for go-around.
Dash8driver1312 is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2014, 06:51
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: se england
Posts: 1,580
Likes: 0
Received 48 Likes on 21 Posts
Many thanks folks, I did think that changing the pitch would do it but as nothing is for free I was not sure where the extra power would come from-ie the increase in fuel flow. Would that have been true in the days of RR Darts like Viscounts and F27s or would the crew have had to do a bit more work?
Thanks again PB
pax britanica is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2014, 08:23
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The power out put of the prop is rpm times the torque.

So to get max power you need the props to be going as fast as possible and the torque to also be at max.

As for the go-around itself the aircraft with flight directors do have a GA button on the power levers which then command straight ahead and what ever is the best pitch for the GA.

The actual flying of the GA according to my mates who are now on jets is exactly the same apart from their auto throttle takes care of the power where as us TP drivers have to set it manually. The jet boys do say though that sometimes getting the full whack of power is more work than the manual setting of about 70-80% and asking the PNF to trim it if required.
mad_jock is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2014, 09:48
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,822
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
The power output of the prop is rpm times the torque.
Times the propeller efficiency.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2014, 09:58
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aye true if they have dings in them it will cut your power transfer down.

Maybe you will know Dave but I was told that having the prop heat mats on also dropped their efficiency due to heating the boundary layer or some such.

Can't see it making that much difference myself and if it needs to be on, it needs to on.
mad_jock is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2014, 12:44
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,822
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
Can't see it making that much difference myself
No, dings and de-icing mats will have negligible effect.

But the aerodynamic efficiency of a typical prop, as defined by work output (thrust x TAS) divided by work input (your torque x RPM value) is only about 80-85% max.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2014, 14:16
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
At least some of the Darts (only flew 542s) had a fuel trimmer system. You either used a chart or a whiz wheel and input the field elevation and temperature and came up with a percentage between 20 and 80. Set that number, move the condition level to CRUISE LOCKOUT and voila, you shove the power levers to the stops and the engines (shouldn't) overtemp.
MarkerInbound is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2014, 17:41
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok we are talking thermodynamic type output not what pilots care about ie

100% of what you can get compared to 97% of what you could get with the props at 97% rpm.
mad_jock is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2014, 21:06
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,822
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
Ok we are talking thermodynamic type output not what pilots care about
No, aerodynamic not thermodynamic. But pilots aren't expected to understand either.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2014, 13:30
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well we did that sort of stuff in thermo labs, but then again it was mech eng.

Navier stokes never really pressed my buttons, and still fails to do so.
mad_jock is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.