Wikiposts
Search
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

A Truly Candid Captain

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th May 2002, 05:47
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DFW, Tx - USA
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A Truly Candid Captain

The link below is to a story about a Captain who is IMHO very courageous and candid. As a pax/slf I am happy to see that there are Captains who are willing to try and "improve" the trade as compared to the situations noted here on PpRuNe regards the Near East CRM. See the link below:

click here:

Please note - I am not talking about CRM practices in the predominently caucasian world of flying. This is a comment about "culture" and NOT race!!
AA SLF is offline  
Old 19th May 2002, 06:55
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: by the river
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AA SLF & EGPWS

As SLF myself, thanks you for the article. I was not aware that such equipment is now standards on new aircraft.

I agree absolutely with your comments concerning Capt. Rombach, and Bob if you see this - on behalf of all of the general public & the SLF, THANKS. If you read this and know Bob, we would appreciate his comments on many of the subjects on the PPRuNe forums, have him log in please.

How I wish that all your colleagues could have that much honnesty to tell their bosses and companies the truth when they have taken a stupid pill. 18'000 hours maybe helps, but even a youngster should be able to do it, unfortunately given the politics of many companies, such a confession that in many of the world's airlines, can be or is career terminal.
gofer is offline  
Old 19th May 2002, 09:39
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: -11`
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is not in any way meant to sound negative about aforementioned captain, but if he hadn`t made the call himself, he would have had the call from his boss a few hours later.
If you run into a terrain warning, that`s recorded in the "black box" and comes out with the periodical routine check of it.

Big Brother is always watching over our shoulders. That`s why it`s so very important that flight recorder data is treated as a thing to learn from, not to prosecute with.

Typo
seat 0A is offline  
Old 19th May 2002, 13:04
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Global
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EGPWS IS GOOD

For the past year we have had this lovely piece of kit.

Our operations are in transport category aircraft into many and varied airports with little or no navaids and no radar environments.

It has a very good predictability rate, but and it is a but..... the data base is not accurate away from major traffic areas.

The db is slowly being updated but the civil authorities are starting to raise eyebrows at the number of incident reports being generated by incorrect warinings.

Other than the db corrections the unit is the best thing to be put in the modern cockpit and will undoubtable save many more lives in the future.
international hog driver is offline  
Old 19th May 2002, 15:51
  #5 (permalink)  
Trash du Blanc
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: KBHM
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had the pleasure of using this system recently in a night descent into Quito. The approach is basically a downwind, base and final approach inside a steep box canyon. Put one side on EGPWS, the other on radar, and watched the canyon walls close in beside us. It is worth its weight in gold.

I remember when EGPWS came out, they did a presentation at an ALPA Air Safety Forum. They simply obtained the flightpath data from 5 famous CFIT accidents (Cali, Cheyenne (USAF C-130), and others) and showed what their product would have displayed to the pilots. It was chilling.
Huck is offline  
Old 20th May 2002, 03:55
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Down south, USA.
Posts: 1,594
Received 9 Likes on 1 Post
Thumbs up

AA SLF: thanks for the very interesting link. We have done some visual approaches at night into Bozeman, Montana. You stay pretty much level there until over some lights in the valley, or can see the high mountain ridge underneath, then leave the minimum altitude on the Victor airway. If you did it too often, you could get a bit relaxed.

Salt Lake Center in early December offered us a VOR with a circle to land, our first time at Kalispell, MT, and at night-end of a fairly long day, but no snow on the ground. It is uncontrolled, also. As for a circle in night IMC, for a first time approach, I said to the other pilot "no way-that controller must be kidding". Many controllers probably have no instrument flying experience, except on a jumpseat. Of course the other option, a procedure turn, is sometimes only seen once every eight years, or even less.

Years ago, the Las Vegas Approach controller gave us a go around early, in order to fit a "high-speed cattle car" (as in Burbank)" 737 in front. I told the Captain, we will stay over the valley lights while receiving vectors to downwind, no matter what the assigned headings, and not enter the dark (mountainous) areas.

A Navy Reserve DC-9 almost hit mountains near NAS Fallon (Nevada) years ago. A pilot had, as a personal technique, set the radar altimeter to some number, and when the needle quickly moved around with the yellow light on, they shoved the throttles fwd and immed. pulled up. The NAS controller had been confused about call signs.
Ignition Override is offline  
Old 20th May 2002, 10:46
  #7 (permalink)  
Alba Gu Brath
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Merseyside
Age: 55
Posts: 738
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is somewhat refreshing to note that the captain concerned was able to report what had happended to his boss without ramifications on his job or career. He made an error, he realised it and corrected for it, then he reported it so nobody else would (unknowingly) make the same error. Surely that is one of the fundamental basics of safe aviation??
Big Tudor is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.