Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

Read back issue?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st October 2013 | 12:29
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: Severn Estuary
Read back issue?

Scotland: Two Boeing 747 Planes In Near Miss
NacelleStrake is offline  
Reply
Old 21st October 2013 | 12:32
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,052
Likes: 0
From: In transit
Two transatlantic Boeing 747S nearly crash after pilots failed to follow instructions | Mail Online
Terrifying near miss as two packed passenger planes came with just ONE HUNDRED feet after all four pilots failed to follow instructions
Capetonian is offline  
Reply
Old 21st October 2013 | 12:47
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: Severn Estuary
Capetonian. I would give the usual 'hyped' up reporting, in the article, a swerve.They couldn't have made this up, surely?
NacelleStrake is offline  
Reply
Old 21st October 2013 | 13:13
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 1
From: On the wireless...
Utter alarmist rubbish.

From the UKAB report
the Board opined that there was no risk of a collision.
Talkdownman is offline  
Reply
Old 21st October 2013 | 13:15
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
From: Colchester
Read back issue?

I am impressed how the Sky story relates how there are but two pilots involved at one point in their story. Of course, TCAS had nothing to do with their avoiding action either.
Dash8driver1312 is offline  
Reply
Old 21st October 2013 | 13:32
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: Severn Estuary
The report reads:

"The subsequent TCAS RA was followed.

Following the incident the B747(1) captain
contacted the B747(2)
captain who confirmed that they
were instructed to turn L.
.
The written report from the
B747(2) captain stated that they were instructed
to turn immediate L heading 270.
°
and believed the other ac was to turn R heading 050
°
.They started the turn and then
were instructed to turn immediately heading 050
°
.
They received a TCAS RA and climbed to FL345."

B747(2)pilot reported resolution advisory in the climb
.
This was acknowledged by ATCO(1).
Separation between the two ac reduced to 3.5nm/300ft"

Last edited by NacelleStrake; 21st October 2013 at 13:51.
NacelleStrake is offline  
Reply
Old 21st October 2013 | 13:36
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
From: Midlands
Indeed, daily mail are very good at hyping up 'barely there' stories

"They were within 100ft of each other!!" - yeah, vertically, with 10 miles of horizontal separation

Like the airprox board said, no risk of collision

Last edited by Burnie5204; 21st October 2013 at 13:39.
Burnie5204 is offline  
Reply
Old 21st October 2013 | 13:42
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,052
Likes: 0
From: In transit
However, none of the '1,000 people aboard' are reported to gave been 'screaming in terror as the heroic pilots wrestled with the controls as the two giant aircraft converged on each other at a combined speed of twice the speed of sound'.

Last edited by Capetonian; 21st October 2013 at 13:43.
Capetonian is offline  
Reply
Old 21st October 2013 | 13:54
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
From: Front Stands
However, none of the '1,000 people aboard' are reported to gave been 'screaming in terror as the heroic pilots wrestled with the controls as the two giant aircraft converged on each other at a combined speed of twice the speed of sound'.
Here here Capetonian! Sums up nicely how the press blows everything out of proportion! looked close on flightradar but doesn't reflect a true radar report!
speedbird_481_papa is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.