No engine power needed until lined up........
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Severn Estuary
Age: 63
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No engine power needed until lined up........
Messrs Messier Bugatti Dowty, [Airbus undercarriage manufacturer's],have developed an electric motor to power the taxi of large jet transports to cut back on expensive fuel burn during this portion of the flight. When will we get V1 speed on this?
Last edited by NacelleStrake; 20th Jun 2013 at 19:31.
Avoid imitations
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,576
Received 433 Likes
on
228 Posts
Nice idea, but is it practical?
Jet engines, even at idle, burn fuel (and produce residual thrust, which is what keeps the aircraft rolling).
So, unless the engines are only started at the end of the taxying phase (and would this be allowed, possibly not) how much fuel will actually be saved by using this system?
It's also a bigger logistical problem if the aircraft goes tech on start when it's already in a queue on the taxiway, as opposed to on stand. There is probably nowhere to turn off except via the runway. Many tech issues are discovered during, or just after engine start.
Where will the power to drive the electric motors come from? Additional batteries, a bigger APU, or a generator (i.e engine driven...see above)?
Jet engines, even at idle, burn fuel (and produce residual thrust, which is what keeps the aircraft rolling).
So, unless the engines are only started at the end of the taxying phase (and would this be allowed, possibly not) how much fuel will actually be saved by using this system?
It's also a bigger logistical problem if the aircraft goes tech on start when it's already in a queue on the taxiway, as opposed to on stand. There is probably nowhere to turn off except via the runway. Many tech issues are discovered during, or just after engine start.
Where will the power to drive the electric motors come from? Additional batteries, a bigger APU, or a generator (i.e engine driven...see above)?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Severn Estuary
Age: 63
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
APU, apparently.... Messier-Bugatti-Dowty
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Even if the whole premise is a good idea, as a mere SLF I don't understand why you'd want to build in the additional equipment (= weight) to the a/c when a perfectly good tug would do the job instead.
In any case, I always understood there were sound technical and safety reasons (not to mention it being good airmanship) why you warm the engines up away from the runway before turning the volume up to 11 for t/o?
In any case, I always understood there were sound technical and safety reasons (not to mention it being good airmanship) why you warm the engines up away from the runway before turning the volume up to 11 for t/o?
Last edited by JustOccurred2Me; 21st Jun 2013 at 12:21.
Aviator Extraordinaire
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma USA
Age: 76
Posts: 2,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
One does not warm up a gas turbine - it's not necessary.
I have also operated at airports that I had to pre-heat jet engines prior to start, as not to risk the starter shafts from breaking*, again only if the aircraft remained outside overnight due to the low ambient temperatures.
* I saw a Lear 24 shear the starter shafts on both engines one morning in Gunnison, Colorado. We tried to tell them, but....
Last edited by con-pilot; 21st Jun 2013 at 16:20.
Paxing All Over The World
Here we go again! This question gets raised about once a year. All the arguments for and against have been set ou tin the previous threads whihc careful searching should find.
In short:
In short:
- The places where the most benefit to be had is at large airports, such as LHR andf JFK. At smaller, there is little delay.
- Since every large airport is built around the current format of tug for push back and then taxi. How do you re-engineer them?
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 2,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why do you need to re-engineer anything? How does a self-powered pushback require a different layout?
I think anything that frees us from reliance on availability of tugs is a thoroughly good thing. It is far simpler and more reliable (and often quicker) to operate from taxi-off stands and this innovation effectively makes all stands taxi-off.
Ditch the pushback tugs, bring it on!
I think anything that frees us from reliance on availability of tugs is a thoroughly good thing. It is far simpler and more reliable (and often quicker) to operate from taxi-off stands and this innovation effectively makes all stands taxi-off.
Ditch the pushback tugs, bring it on!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I wouldn't know.
Posts: 4,499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why re-engineer them? Start up the APU, push back with just one wing walker instead of a push back driver and a wing walker and then taxi on electric power out to the runway, start up engines to meet the three minute warm up time (or two, depending on engine), shut down the APU and off you go.
Could get interesting if the APU dies before the engines are started and the aircraft in question is blocking a major taxiway.
Could get interesting if the APU dies before the engines are started and the aircraft in question is blocking a major taxiway.
Paxing All Over The World
Denti
Exactly! How do you extract the stalled a/c and get it back? Does the recuse tug have to go down the runway (at it's usual speed) to get to the head of the queue?
Do you need to lay some more access roads to the queue line?
If this was a simple task - it would have been running more than a decade ago. As I understand it, attempts and Patents on this idea have been running for a lot longer.
The only change now is the price of fuel that might make it viable. But any airport that introduced it would be faced with charges (redundancy, surplus capital equipment etc.) and those costs get passed directly onto the carriers and our tickets.
BBC News - Paris Air Show: Aircraft tech that works best on the ground
Could get interesting if the APU dies before the engines are started and the aircraft in question is blocking a major taxiway.
Do you need to lay some more access roads to the queue line?
If this was a simple task - it would have been running more than a decade ago. As I understand it, attempts and Patents on this idea have been running for a lot longer.
The only change now is the price of fuel that might make it viable. But any airport that introduced it would be faced with charges (redundancy, surplus capital equipment etc.) and those costs get passed directly onto the carriers and our tickets.
BBC News - Paris Air Show: Aircraft tech that works best on the ground
Last edited by PAXboy; 21st Jun 2013 at 23:43.
Join Date: May 2009
Location: HKG
Age: 47
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
One does not warm up a gas turbine - it's not necessary.
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I wouldn't know.
Posts: 4,499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
@Paxboy, to be honest it is not that big an issue, the same thing can happen right now already (technical problems). And yes, in that case a tug has to go out and get the plane off the taxiway.
Had to get towed of a runway once already, not a big deal, a couple more holdings for those arriving and a few minutes delay for those waiting to get off the ground.
Had to get towed of a runway once already, not a big deal, a couple more holdings for those arriving and a few minutes delay for those waiting to get off the ground.
Look at the bigger picture. How many times have you been sat on the gate, ready to go but waiting for a tug. This system gets rid of up to 3 ground staff and a tug per pushback. That is a big saving in the long run.
Depends on the airport.
By the way, Lightning mate..
One does not warm up a gas turbine - it's not necessary.
Every engine run AMM ref I have come across says to let the engine stabalise at idle for 5 mins before increasing power.
However, I take the point that a certain extremely quick twin engine interceptor may not have had this luxury when called upon to say hello to the neighbours from across the North Sea.
By the way, Lightning mate..
One does not warm up a gas turbine - it's not necessary.
However, I take the point that a certain extremely quick twin engine interceptor may not have had this luxury when called upon to say hello to the neighbours from across the North Sea.