Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner)
Reload this Page >

19 PIA planes grounded for poor maintenance

Wikiposts
Search
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

19 PIA planes grounded for poor maintenance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Feb 2013, 10:21
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
19 PIA planes grounded for poor maintenance

Nearly half of the PIA fleet has been grounded because of poor maintenance of its old and outdated aircraft.

“The Pakistan International Airlines is facing grounding of highest ever number of 19 planes in its history,” a source told Dawn on Sunday.

Two PIA aircraft have been grounded after emergency landings in Leeds, UK, and Muscat recently.

Note: Leeds is incorrect. Should be Manchester as a PIA B777-200 diverted to Manchester enroute Toronto due to gear door issue.
Incident: PIA B772 over North Sea on Feb 24th 2013, gear door indication

There was an incident with a PIA aircraft at Leeds however. The PIA A310 AP-BDZ had a serious hydraulic leak just before the push back last night so its had to overnight to be fixed.

video of landing of PIA A310 at Leeds at Feb 23


continue at source: 19 PIA planes grounded for poor maintenance

Last edited by 1stspotter; 25th Feb 2013 at 11:21.
1stspotter is offline  
Old 25th Feb 2013, 15:53
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: London
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PIA Planes Grounded

They don't call it "Please Inform Allah" for nothing.
ocnus is offline  
Old 25th Feb 2013, 21:14
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: leeds
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't get why the PIA A310 landing at Leeds is from a year ago,how does this relate to this weekends events?.
lbalad is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2013, 02:28
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Was the landing in the video really 'bad'? And in what way?
I couldn't tell....
lazy man is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2013, 06:41
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Folks,
It is a far cry from the 70's. when PIA maintenance was very good and very conservative, and highly rated by FAA.
Tootle pip!!
LeadSled is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2013, 07:11
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: The blasted heath
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No Lazy Man it was a 'really scary dangerous landing'...
gcal is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2013, 08:23
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: South of Watford
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the Video was worse than the landing !
Sir Richard is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2013, 08:35
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: UK
Age: 59
Posts: 2,712
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Well, it did look as if he was still going quite quick as he passed the glidepath aerials at the upwind end
Wycombe is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.