Wikiposts
Search
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

Wake Separation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Aug 2012, 12:10
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: London
Age: 58
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wake Separation

How is wake separation defined? It could be a distance between aircraft or the time taken for them to pass the same point, for a constant speed these are equivalent. If time is the measure then as speed increases the distance between aircraft decreases, this would appear to take the relationship in the wrong direction.

If distance is the measure then the most efficient use of the airspace would be to have the aircraft fly at maximum speed, the distance between aircraft is the same if they are both flying at 120 knots or 240 knots.

I’ve been trying to come up with a couple of lines of algebra that shows that as speed increases the turbulence will also increase this would suggest that neither time nor distance is the correct measure
PhineasC is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2012, 12:49
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: At home
Posts: 1,232
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I was under the impresion that the induced drag and the tip vortices are directly related, so the tip vortices increase as the speed decreases. Therefore if the aircraft are flying slower (all other things being equal), the separation needs to be greater.
Mechta is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2012, 13:38
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,822
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
How is wake separation defined? It could be a distance between aircraft or the time taken for them to pass the same point, for a constant speed these are equivalent.
It's usually expressed as a distance.

If distance is the measure then the most efficient use of the airspace would be to have the aircraft fly at maximum speed, the distance between aircraft is the same if they are both flying at 120 knots or 240 knots.
Well that's an extreme example, but you have a point.

With distance-based separation, a headwind on approach has the effect of increasing the time interval between successive aircraft passing the same point (since their groundspeed is reduced) and therefore affects the arrival rate.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2012, 18:56
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: LHR/EGLL
Age: 45
Posts: 4,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PhineasC

In the UK we separate for Wake Turbulence by distance during the arrival phase, leading to the impact upon arrival rates that DaveReidUK has described, and by time for runway separation on departure.

Work is ongoing to switch to a time-based system for arrvivals, hence providing resilience to the arrival rate in headwind conditions.
Gonzo is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2012, 15:15
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: London
Age: 58
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To clutter already busy airwaves thank you for your answers.

From what has been said it is departures that are much of a capacity constraint as arrivals. It must be frustrating when captains are optimistic about pushback times or take more time to get to the runway than is necessary
PhineasC is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2012, 17:38
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: earth
Posts: 1,341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just talking about wake separation the other day after hearing the shearing air (sort of like someone whispering a tearing in your ear) quite some time after an aircraft flew overhead. It is impossible to calculate, what we do know is that in still air the wake turbulence last's longer. Distance and a/c type are used for separation as a standard.
grounded27 is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2012, 17:56
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,822
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
It is impossible to calculate, what we do know is that in still air the wake turbulence lasts longer.
Is it really impossible ?

Google CREDOS and CROPS.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2012, 21:02
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: LHR/EGLL
Age: 45
Posts: 4,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Depends what is meant by calculate.

CREDOS/CROPS allow for reduced separations due to forecast behaviour of vortex based on vortex modelling and wind measurement.

TBS allows for reduced separation based on wind measurement which is used to modify current vortex separations which do not take account of differing ground speed.

You cannot calculate the behaviour of vortex any more than you can calculate the behaviour of a cloud. You can measure, record, feed that that into a model and therefore forecast and predict its behaviour.
Gonzo is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.