Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

Runway Headings

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th July 2012 | 13:28
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: UK
Runway Headings

I expect that time has gone quicker than I thought but it does not seem that long ago that Heathrow changed and more recently Stansted. Given that both Gatwick & Luton are not that far away I assume they will also change?
Ifield Lad is offline  
Reply
Old 25th July 2012 | 13:36
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
From: LHR
I haven't been flying long enough to know what they were before but Gatwick is currently 259/079 (26/08) so will need another 5 degrees to get to 254 before it's changed to 25/07. That'll take quite a while methinks.
HPbleed is offline  
Reply
Old 25th July 2012 | 14:45
  #3 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 18,575
Likes: 4
From: UK
Wait until the North and South Poles flip...............................
BOAC is offline  
Reply
Old 25th July 2012 | 14:51
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Turkey
Runway Headings

Or the sun rises from west
viperburns is offline  
Reply
Old 25th July 2012 | 14:58
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,155
Likes: 111
From: There and here
Wait until the North and South Poles flip..............................
Then LHR won't be on people's minds anymore! Let's hope that it will be a few hundred years (or better 1,000's) in the future. By all evidence it appears to swap over in a relatively short while


SHJ
SpringHeeledJack is offline  
Reply
Old 25th July 2012 | 18:28
  #6 (permalink)  
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 17,694
Likes: 2,033
From: Reading, UK
Given that both Gatwick & Luton are not that far away I assume they will also change?
Their proximity to each other only tells you that their runway magnetic headings will change at roughly the same rate.

It doesn't mean that their designations will change at the same time - that would only be the case if their true headings differed by a multiple of 10° (which they don't).
DaveReidUK is offline  
Reply
Old 25th July 2012 | 19:43
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 0
From: engineer at large
when are we going to abandon the magvar?
FlightPathOBN is offline  
Reply
Old 26th July 2012 | 06:59
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: London
In the 21st century is there any need to rely on a bit of magic metal?
PhineasC is offline  
Reply
Old 26th July 2012 | 23:03
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 0
From: engineer at large
exactly...look at all of the modern technology, that must have a variable magvar built into it.

What really cracks me up is when they rename the runways, and all of the associated charts, equipment, and infrastructure changes.

As a point of reference, that is how they determined seafloor spreading, the magnetic orientations in the rock across the Atlantic, when the poles flip, and according to records, it wobbles for a very short time then flips.

The Sun drives the forces, and just as magnets repel or attract, the Sun and the Earth mag poles do the same.

The Suns mag pole flipped in 2001, and the Earths and been wobbling quite a bit, so scientists look for the mag poles to flip very soon...

and no, the Sun will not rise in the West, the Earth doesnt flip, just the magnetic polarity....

Nasa simulation..


I would hope that you are not using a compass to navigate...

Last edited by FlightPathOBN; 26th July 2012 at 23:13.
FlightPathOBN is offline  
Reply
Old 27th July 2012 | 07:00
  #10 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 18,575
Likes: 4
From: UK
and no, the Sun will not rise in the West, the Earth doesn't flip, just the magnetic polarity
- this has also been 'investigated' on PPRune before. What do you call the 'North' pole when the poles flip? Where is 'West' when you are facing 'North'.

This thread has legs. Let's hope it doesn't 'go west'...............
BOAC is offline  
Reply
Old 27th July 2012 | 08:17
  #11 (permalink)  
Gnome de PPRuNe
Community Builder
Community Influencer
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 15,188
Likes: 1,201
From: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Whilst I can see its attractions, I expect the thread will have gone south well before Easter...
treadigraph is offline  
Reply
Old 27th July 2012 | 08:29
  #12 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 80
From: Bedford, UK
The 'north seeking pole' will then point south but the interlude with zero field as it flips may be a bit tricky in terms of species survival...Even worse, may have to reorientate tv aerial .
Mr Optimistic is offline  
Reply
Old 27th July 2012 | 09:00
  #13 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 18,575
Likes: 4
From: UK
Even worse, may have to reorientate tv aerial
- only if you watch regional TV........................

Homing pigeons just won't, will they?
BOAC is offline  
Reply
Old 27th July 2012 | 10:08
  #14 (permalink)  
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 17,694
Likes: 2,033
From: Reading, UK
Great quote on the NASA website:

"While the conditions that cause polarity reversals are not entirely predictable – the north pole's movement could subtly change direction, for instance – there is nothing in the millions of years of geologic record to suggest that any of the 2012 doomsday scenarios connected to a pole reversal should be taken seriously.

A reversal might, however, be good business for magnetic compass manufacturers."
DaveReidUK is offline  
Reply
Old 27th July 2012 | 16:16
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 7,056
Likes: 2
From: London
the problem comes in the flip-over period - it isn't thought to be truly instantaneous - may be tens or even a couple of hundred years of very low wandering" magnetic fields
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Reply
Old 27th July 2012 | 18:00
  #16 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2003
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
From: Surrey
The actual runway heading at LGW is 259 and 079 respectively. So its a while away from having to change!
Blinkz is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.