Building height and red anticollision marks
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Poland
Age: 35
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Building height and red anticollision marks
Hello everyone,
This is my first thread on this forum
I wonder from couple weeks what is a height of buildings where anticollison lights are required? I suppose this is international rule, isn't it?
Salute!
This is my first thread on this forum
I wonder from couple weeks what is a height of buildings where anticollison lights are required? I suppose this is international rule, isn't it?
Salute!
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: England
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Any temporary or permanent structure, including all
appurtenances, that exceeds an overall height of 200
feet (61m) above ground level (AGL) or exceeds any
obstruction standard contained in 14 CFR part 77,
should normally be marked and/or lighted. However,
an FAA aeronautical study may reveal that the
absence of marking and/or lighting will not impair
aviation safety.
appurtenances, that exceeds an overall height of 200
feet (61m) above ground level (AGL) or exceeds any
obstruction standard contained in 14 CFR part 77,
should normally be marked and/or lighted. However,
an FAA aeronautical study may reveal that the
absence of marking and/or lighting will not impair
aviation safety.
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamburg
Age: 46
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hello Sky Wanderer, and welcome to the forum.
The international rules you are asking for are contained in Volume I, Chapter 6 of Annex 14 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation. You can find a read-only PDF on the Swiss CAA's website.
The international rules you are asking for are contained in Volume I, Chapter 6 of Annex 14 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation. You can find a read-only PDF on the Swiss CAA's website.
Last edited by hvogt; 22nd Jul 2012 at 18:59. Reason: changed link and refernence
