Flight times and durations
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: London
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Flight times and durations
Two quick questions, if I may:
1) Why would an airline allot different flight durations for an outbound and return flight? Route in question is STN-BDS. 07:55-11:45 (2 hours 50) outbound and 12:10-14:15 (3 hours 5) inbound? The scheduling department cannot know the exact flight's duration in advance and I know there is always a 'buffer', but why the extra fifteen minutes on the return flight?
2) Is there a website that gives accurate, actual flight durations? I know FR don't put details on FlightStats, but are there any others?
1) Why would an airline allot different flight durations for an outbound and return flight? Route in question is STN-BDS. 07:55-11:45 (2 hours 50) outbound and 12:10-14:15 (3 hours 5) inbound? The scheduling department cannot know the exact flight's duration in advance and I know there is always a 'buffer', but why the extra fifteen minutes on the return flight?
2) Is there a website that gives accurate, actual flight durations? I know FR don't put details on FlightStats, but are there any others?
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Cloud 9
Posts: 2,948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Because the winds generally blow from west to east thus on the outbound he has the wind up his chuff yet on the inbound he has his his head down behind the handlebars trying to gain a knot or two.
Paxing All Over The World
Another reason for longer published times is the destination. If you are going into LHR, then you have to allow holding time and taxi time. If you are going into, say, Southampton, then times are shorter. This applies to many destinations.
Lastly, as you may well know, airlines now always quote the longest possible block time and a scheduled departure time that is well in advance of their slot time. This helps to get us on board and away - as well as any routing and weather delays - to ensure that the they can mark more on time arrivals.
Lastly, as you may well know, airlines now always quote the longest possible block time and a scheduled departure time that is well in advance of their slot time. This helps to get us on board and away - as well as any routing and weather delays - to ensure that the they can mark more on time arrivals.
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Cape Town / UK / Europe
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Also remember if you fly from Cape Town to London it's uphill, so will naturally take longer than a downhill flight from LON - CPT. Seriously, I heard someone say this once!
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: world
Posts: 3,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nicholas, you can't really have "accurate" flight durations. They very much depend on route taken on the day and the winds. On an Atlantic crossing for example flight times can differ by anything up to half an hour westbound and an hour eastbound.
A Runyonesque Character
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The South of France ... Not
Age: 74
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
This information will be collected by and available to those who need it - the airline involved and Eurocontrol CFMU, for example.
An airline will typically monitor every flight duration for each individual flight number. This will enable them to create a frequency distribution which will be pretty much a normal bell-shaped curve. They can then apply this to their own in-house policy to determine scheduled flight times. For example, they may aim to publish a scheduled block time which has been achieved on 85% of occasions in the latest schedule period. In this way block times may be adjusted over time.
An airline will typically monitor every flight duration for each individual flight number. This will enable them to create a frequency distribution which will be pretty much a normal bell-shaped curve. They can then apply this to their own in-house policy to determine scheduled flight times. For example, they may aim to publish a scheduled block time which has been achieved on 85% of occasions in the latest schedule period. In this way block times may be adjusted over time.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: London
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes, I know that. I don't mind whether the data is for yesterday's flight or one last month. I am just trying to find out what the average actual flight duration is for this route, not the block time.
This information is available on FlightStats for lots of airlines, but no longer FR. My question is: can this information be found elsewhere?
This information is available on FlightStats for lots of airlines, but no longer FR. My question is: can this information be found elsewhere?
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How long is a piece of string? Simply measure the distance and divide it by about 400kts and you won't be far off. Problem is that every day, every hour, every minute is different in such a dynamic situation. Wind makes a heck of a difference and air traffic delays can pop up anywhere, any time. A flight that gets a straight-in one day might be held for 40 minutes the next..
Somebody asked what "time" is recorded for stack-leaving. It's the actual time the aircraft passes the beacon to commence approach. EATs are calculated on those times but what other agencies do with the info I do not know.
Somebody asked what "time" is recorded for stack-leaving. It's the actual time the aircraft passes the beacon to commence approach. EATs are calculated on those times but what other agencies do with the info I do not know.
If you look at flight tracking websites you can often find groundspeed. Compare that for a selection of westbound and eastbound flights. You will soon get an idea why westbound flights take longer.
Incidently Cathay put a lot of detail on Flightstats (perhaps too much, including several changes in estimated arrival time) but you can get a lot of useful information.
It is interesting to look at old timetables and see how the timetabled block time has changed throughout the years. It has increased significantly for short haul flights to and from Heathrow over the last twenty years owing to longer taxi times and more time in the stack. The number of movements at LHR has increased significantly over the period but at a cost - ATC will land several widebodies followed by several narrow bodies which increased capacity owing the increased separation required when the later follows the former.
There are instances where an airline will timetable different block times on different days of the week owing to different routings - it may fly over certain countries in order to retain overflying rights. (Have a look at EK 125 from DXB - VIE which is 35 minutes quicker on Thursday.)
I booked a flight between JFK & DCA a few years ago (DL 3115 operated by Mesaba) which was timetabled to take 1 hr 55 mins. It covered the 215 miles in about a third of this time. However you can often be delayed out of JFK and when I checked the statistics the flight reported very good punctuality!
Incidently Cathay put a lot of detail on Flightstats (perhaps too much, including several changes in estimated arrival time) but you can get a lot of useful information.
It is interesting to look at old timetables and see how the timetabled block time has changed throughout the years. It has increased significantly for short haul flights to and from Heathrow over the last twenty years owing to longer taxi times and more time in the stack. The number of movements at LHR has increased significantly over the period but at a cost - ATC will land several widebodies followed by several narrow bodies which increased capacity owing the increased separation required when the later follows the former.
There are instances where an airline will timetable different block times on different days of the week owing to different routings - it may fly over certain countries in order to retain overflying rights. (Have a look at EK 125 from DXB - VIE which is 35 minutes quicker on Thursday.)
I booked a flight between JFK & DCA a few years ago (DL 3115 operated by Mesaba) which was timetabled to take 1 hr 55 mins. It covered the 215 miles in about a third of this time. However you can often be delayed out of JFK and when I checked the statistics the flight reported very good punctuality!
Paxing All Over The World
At JFK, I've had - from Push to turning on to the active = 55 mins. Which can really trash your and punctuality and averages!
I'm am definately not an expert on overflying rights - probably more info on the Flight/Ground Handling Forum. However I know that the former Soviet Union and presumably now Russia charged a significant fee for overflying their territory. It could be that EK are quicker on Thursdays as the pay Russia for overflight rights. If they did not overfly the country the agreement might lapse after a while. There could also be limits in a bilateral agreement.
There was a time with BA / BCal used to fly nonstop twice a week from London - Tokyo & have to stop once a week at Moscow. Flight times between HKG & London used to vary as routings had to vary owing to limited overflying rights. (The block time from HKG - LHR could be as high as 14 hr 40 mins.)
As I say I am not an expert on this, perhaps an expert out there might be able to give a bit more detail.
There was a time with BA / BCal used to fly nonstop twice a week from London - Tokyo & have to stop once a week at Moscow. Flight times between HKG & London used to vary as routings had to vary owing to limited overflying rights. (The block time from HKG - LHR could be as high as 14 hr 40 mins.)
As I say I am not an expert on this, perhaps an expert out there might be able to give a bit more detail.
Last edited by Peter47; 30th Mar 2012 at 19:16.
