Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner)
Reload this Page >

Why is engine type displayed in cockpit?

Wikiposts
Search
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

Why is engine type displayed in cockpit?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Oct 2011, 09:34
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Cape Town
Age: 60
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why is engine type displayed in cockpit?

I was looking at a cockpit video of a 737-200 approach and landing in Cancun, Mexico. At one point I noticed that the there was a name badge with JT7D-17A on it shown in the cockpit.
Why would this be displayed? Is it something to do with reminding the pilots regarding particular in-flight procedures with this type of engine?
regards
Russell
Russells is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2011, 13:55
  #2 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Where several different engine mixes are available (737-200) it is helpful to know which one you have on which pylon.
BOAC is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2011, 14:16
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Cornwall UK
Age: 79
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
JT8D-17A surely?
A30yoyo is offline  
Old 15th Oct 2011, 09:31
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: At home, occasionally
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ENGINE DECALS

This actually can be quite important in cases where different engines, or even different upgrades of same engines are fitted.

At one point in the company that I and many other people who enjoy this website worked for, we operated something like 13 variants of 747, and with three different engine types. The decals were important reminders of vital and differing limitations. For instance, the maximum internal engine start temperature before chopping the start cycle was very different between a P&W engine on a 100 series aircraft, and a two spool GE CF6 on a 200 series.

Limitations of all sorts were mandatory memory items, but those in other areas might be more obvious. It was not unusual for it to take more than one attempt to start an engine within temp limits, so it was important for both pilots and the F/E to revise the markedly different cut-off numbers......melting a whole engine was potentially quite simple, and frowned on by management.

The 400 series in many ways seemed much simpler all round, but we no longer had a Flight Engineer with his third set of eyes and ears.
ONE GREEN AND HOPING is offline  
Old 16th Oct 2011, 14:52
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: EGSS
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not sure but you may also have different dash numbers of JT8D on each wing? I know the '27 could have a mish-mash.
Flightmech is offline  
Old 16th Oct 2011, 17:14
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Blighty (Nth. Downs)
Age: 77
Posts: 2,107
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
It's not just a question of different limitations - important though they are - but one of performance (thrust). Different engines = different aeroplane.

Think of the take-off performance calculation, for example. There will be different charts/tables/database for each engine type and variant.
Chris Scott is offline  
Old 16th Oct 2011, 22:48
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: France
Age: 69
Posts: 1,143
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
The BA 747-400 fleet used to have a mix of RB.211-534G and -534H engines. The H had a higher thrust rating for take-off. There were two decals on the main instrument panel (one in front of each pilot) saying, 'This Aircraft is G-rated' or, 'This Aircraft is H-rated'. As Chris Scott points out, we had to be sure to use the correct charts for calculating take-off performance.

We also checked that the FMC had the correct engine rating by comparing the decal to the data on the Initialisation page.

A few years ago, all the engines were modified to 'G-rated' and now they are progressively being further modified with Trent cores, which makes them 'GT' rated. Same thrust as the 'G' but lower EGTs and fuel burn, so no need for the decals anymore but they're still there!
eckhard is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2011, 08:13
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Cape Town
Age: 60
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I meant JT8D-17A

right you are - JT8D-17A
thanks to all for all the replies
Russells is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2011, 09:11
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Abu Dhabi
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thats correct Flightmech, you could have a mismatch on the aircraft. e.g. a -15A on one side and a -17A on the other.
dubh12000 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.