Maintaining Aircraft in Manila
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: LGW
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maintaining Aircraft in Manila
Read today that Virgin Atlantic are flying their A340-300's all the way to Manila for maintenance. Isn't this a waste of fuel and not exactly environmentally friendly?
How come its cheaper for Virgin to do this instead of having their a/c maintained here? Haven't they got a couple of hangers that could do the job?
How come its cheaper for Virgin to do this instead of having their a/c maintained here? Haven't they got a couple of hangers that could do the job?
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: LGW
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
According to VS's web site, they only use the A340-600 on the VS200/ VS201 to HKG/ SYD. It still looks to me that these a/c are going to MNL and back empty. That is really environmentally friendly but of course this will not be mentioned on their web site.
Heavy checks are scheduled months out so there could be scheduling issues. The normal math balances the cost of labor v. fuel and cycle costs. The cost of labor in the PI would allow VSs to buy lots of fuel.
According to VS's web site, they only use the A340-600 on the VS200/ VS201 to HKG/ SYD. It still looks to me that these a/c are going to MNL and back empty. That is really environmentally friendly but of course this will not be mentioned on their web site.
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: In transit
Age: 70
Posts: 3,052
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would imagine if there are an empty ferry flights they would be HKG to MNL and return. An aircraft comes off a check and is ferried to HKG. The aircraft which is due a check does the service to HKG, and is then ferried to MNL. The aircraft which came off the check then does the service to SYD. Sound feasible?
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: LGW
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So the a/c don't even fly anything out there? Why can't the work be done in UK/ Shannon etc? I know its probably more costly but by the time they look at fuel, crew costs etc. So much for being a green airline.
It does make you wonder sometimes how it all stacks up financially and especially environmentally in such situations. Who knows maybe one day soon we will look back on such practices as indulgent and unthinkable, especially if the much heralded 'peak-oil' manifests itself. 
SHJ
SHJ
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: LGW
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Someone told me that the B744's are maintained in AMS / FRA. Its absurd to send these A343's all that way to have their checks be it C or D. What a waste of fuel.
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: .
Posts: 2,997
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
AMS is still not the UK, what about the refits of the tired old 744's going to China next year then!
VS has and always will go for the cheapest option (that's what the beancounters want) whereas in real terms, the amount of down time after the checks for AOG's and other tech problems will increase that cost, but like most departmentalised business's are, as long as it's not on 'my' budget it doesn't matter.
VS has and always will go for the cheapest option (that's what the beancounters want) whereas in real terms, the amount of down time after the checks for AOG's and other tech problems will increase that cost, but like most departmentalised business's are, as long as it's not on 'my' budget it doesn't matter.
