Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner)
Reload this Page >

What actually happens at take-off?

Wikiposts
Search
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

What actually happens at take-off?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Jun 2011, 05:52
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: North West UK
Posts: 539
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts
What actually happens at take-off?

Very basic question with probably a basic answer.

How does an aircraft rotate during the take-off? I know the pilot pulls on the yoke but what does that do to the aircraft's devices and how does that create the rotation?

Presumably once the nose is in the air the plane gets to a speed at which the wings have enough lift to simply leave the ground?
Espada III is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2011, 06:36
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Here
Posts: 710
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Dynamics of Airplane Flight
CentreFix25 is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2011, 13:21
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Malvern, UK
Posts: 425
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Pulling back the yoke pushes the tail down.

That increases the tilt (angle-ofattack) the wings present to the airflow. That increases the lift and away you go.

You can get airborne without pulling back on the yoke. Just let the plane keep accelerating. Eventually the speed will generate enough lift and again your flying. That does use a lot of runway though!

Speed and angle-of-attack combine to give lift. Although too much angle-of-attack and it all goes wrong and you fall out of the sky (stall).
Dont Hang Up is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2011, 18:22
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: london
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
pulling back the yoke makes horizontal tailplane go up, pushing it down
ceeb is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2011, 21:45
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Near Stalyvegas
Age: 78
Posts: 2,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Or in the case of the HS Trident, the Earths' curvature allows the a/c to leave the runway.....
chiglet is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2011, 22:03
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: England
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Have you lot never heard of lift fairies!?
Lord Spandex Masher is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2011, 22:06
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: In transit
Age: 70
Posts: 3,052
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And I thought it was that bump near the end of the runway that got the 'plane airborne!
Capetonian is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2011, 22:08
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: England
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cape, mostly an irrelevant post this but - THANK YOU FOR THE APOSTROPHE
Lord Spandex Masher is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2011, 18:02
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Northampton, England
Age: 64
Posts: 468
Received 22 Likes on 18 Posts
Hi espada - not seen you in another place of late!!

AB - aka Bromptonaut!!
Airbanda is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2011, 10:42
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: North West UK
Posts: 539
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts
Indeed AB - got fed up with Dog and his politics.

Thank you all above (well some of you) for the useful information. Elevators up; tail down; nose in air; increased lift and away you go.
Espada III is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2011, 22:28
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Essex UK
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Must be lift fairies else how would taildraggers fly?
Conventional Gear is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2011, 11:33
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Malvern, UK
Posts: 425
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Must be lift fairies else how would taildraggers fly?
Don't get me started - half my hours are on taildraggers.

And we don't wish to get Espada confused with the idea that, in some aeroplanes, you have to push the stick forward during the takeoff roll.
Dont Hang Up is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2011, 15:33
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: England
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Or if you got enough speed you wouldn't have to do anything
Lord Spandex Masher is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2011, 16:03
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Essex UK
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's not speed it's how loud is the engine.

You see on a taildragger with a very loud engine there is no need to push the stick forward.

The loud engine will attract sufficient lift fairies for it to fly eventually with no stick input.

(perhaps)
Conventional Gear is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2011, 16:15
  #15 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: North West UK
Posts: 539
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts
You have been listening to the stories I tell my children!
Espada III is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2011, 18:12
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: ascot berks uk
Age: 93
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dear Chiglet how could you be so horrible about the lovely Trident "Ground Gripper" yes but once the super stickey tyres left the runway and the wheels were up the words "pocket Rocket" spring to mind .you'll be saying next that the reason for the off set nose leg was to stop it making a thumping noise as it wouldn't keep hitting the runway center line lights.
Can we old Aviation types give the poor originator the right answers to his question, I thought on the old tail draggers the yoke was eased forwards to get the tail up to gain flying speed but what do I know I was AVIONICS

Last edited by avionic type; 14th Jun 2011 at 18:18. Reason: A plea added
avionic type is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2011, 19:19
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Essex UK
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OK the truth about flying a taildragger -

Lift equation states that the lift is proportional to the aoa and square of the velocity.

Planes (sorry 'Planes) take off when the lift produced is greater than the weight.

On a low powered taildragger, without putting the stick forward one may not accelerate sufficiently on a short runway to satisfy the velocity required for flight as in the nose up attitude it is very draggy. The tail is brought up to reduce drag and aid acceleration. Strangely this actually reduces the aoa so is in effect the opposite of a rotation, it's fine though because eventually the velocity part of the equation catches up and the thing flies off or is encouraged to un-stick with a relaxation of the forward pressure to put the aircraft into the climb attitude.

On more powerful types (Super Cub) you can achieve a three point take-off with the tail down. There is sufficient power to accelerate and lift off - all be it with a high angle of attack (near critical angle). This is OK as long as the pilot puts the nose down and continues the acceleration in ground effect before continuing to the climb. POH technique for soft field take-off of the Super Cub. Most bring the tail up though, because it is fun and looks cool. NOTE: There are aircraft where when on the ground the wing is at or above the critical aoa - they will never take-off in the three point position)

Between the fully tail-up and tail-down take off, you have the partial tail up. This is often preferred for types with very large props and lots of swirling mass up front. The upside of this technique is one lifts off in the climb attitude and only has to maintain it. The downside it it is very easy to become airborne due to a gust and drop back down on the runway during the take-off run. (scary)

Most of the problems with taildraggers are caused by the strange forces involved confusing the lift fairies, this can lead to nasty swings to the left or right depending on engine rotation and the side where most lift fairies fall off the wing and tailplane... Oh OK the first bit was true (probably).
Conventional Gear is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2011, 08:57
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: ascot berks uk
Age: 93
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Of course the Shackleton got round the "Swing on takeoff" by having conta- rotating props, plus the MK1s and 2s were taildraggers and the lift fairies were happy bunnies .
I shall now retire to my atomic bomb proof shelter to await the flak.
avionic type is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.