Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner)
Reload this Page >

Meaning of "company" in aviation speak

Wikiposts
Search
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

Meaning of "company" in aviation speak

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Oct 2010, 19:48
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: London
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Meaning of "company" in aviation speak

Evening,

Can I ask a quick question (or two)?

Does "company" in aviation-speak only refer to BA? As in: "Speedbird XYZ: line up after the departing company 319."

Is this term "official" or just accepted "short-hand"?
Is it used at all UK airports or only at LHR?
Is it only used when speaking to another BA aircraft, or would a pilot from any airline at a UK airport be expected to know who he means?

Finally, do other countries have an equivalent? For example, would an ATCO at Charles de Gauille call an Air France by a similar name?

Best wishes
Nick
Nicholas49 is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2010, 19:56
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Lamb and Flag
Age: 69
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Company" = aircraft with same livery. It is only used if both aircraft from the airline are wearing the same livery ... if not, e.g. ACMI with no paint job, then the term company isn't used. And yes it happens all over the place.
Sir Herbert Gussett is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2010, 20:17
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: London
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Got it. Thanks to you both!
Nicholas49 is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2010, 06:44
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: world
Posts: 3,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
if not, e.g. ACMI with no paint job, then the term company isn't used
Well, that's the theory. However, as far as landing traffic is concerned, the Tower controller can't always see what livery the landing a/c is painted in and he/she may inadvertantly use the term "company" based on the information on their flight progress strip.
Hotel Tango is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2010, 06:58
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"line up after the departing company 319"

No controller would ever say that. It should be "After the departing XXX line up".
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2010, 06:58
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 3,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Generally it refers to other aircraft of the same livery or operation, though not always.

Often it simply means "you guys who are all from generally the same place...or so we think."
SNS3Guppy is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2010, 17:01
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: London
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Heathrow Director: I am not a qualified Air Traffic Controller! I tried my best to use the correct terminology, but given that I only heard that phrase on some YouTube video about a year ago, I think you have to cut me some slack. I even said "departing" rather than "taking-off". That said, I take note of the correct order.

What if it's dark? Surely it makes it harder for both ATCOs and pilots to see the livery in which adjacent aircraft are painted, especially if it is directly in front of you on the taxiway? Is there not the slightest risk of causing confusion by using the term?
Nicholas49 is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2010, 19:30
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In terms of conditionals based on landing aircraft, it must always be the first one on approach. Further, conditional clearances may not be used during the hours of darkness. ATC procedures are not just decided on a whim, there is a comprehensive hazard analysis undertaken before any changes are made and all risks are minimised.
reportyourlevel is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2010, 20:17
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nicholas49. OK.. but you are one of many on here who's profile reveals nothing and it is the "Professional Pilots, etc, etc."
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2010, 20:23
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
reportyourlevel. Just curious, but presumably the prohibition of using conditional clearances at night is relatively recent? I recall when an instruction appeared that we could only use a single conditional clearance at night but I did not know it was now fully taboo.
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2010, 21:01
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
HD, reading up on this I realise that I wasn't very clear in my previous post. Our MATS Pt2 prohibits any conditional clearances at night or other times when stopbars are displayed (as well as some other situations). This has been the case at least for the last four years, but I can't speak for before that.

Edited to correct inaccuracies (thanks BT777 - the line between Pt1 and Pt2 has obviously blurred a little in my head!).

Last edited by reportyourlevel; 20th Oct 2010 at 04:17.
reportyourlevel is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2010, 21:45
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mats Pt1 doesn't prohibit conditional line up clearances at night. The only restriction is that you can't have multiple lineups at night.

It's done aircraft after aircraft at Heathrow every night!
BT777 is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2010, 05:24
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: HKG
Age: 47
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not always with the same livery. Not sure the rules on this but if two aircraft have the same call sign then it also gets used, eg, GSS use speedbird and are sometimes told to do something with reference to company which is a BA aircraft. Same elsewhere, Cathay operates some dragonair flights and have been told to do something after the company 320 which is a dragonair aircraft. Have also heard a Cathay aircraft using a dragonair callsign being instructed to follow company 340 which was a cathay aircraft using a cathay callsign. This may not be how the rules are written but most people up front are smart enough to figure it out and if not would ask for clarification.
SloppyJoe is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.