If a 747s engine;s failed midflight could it glide down and land safely?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Surrey
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If a 747s engine;s failed midflight could it glide down and land safely?
Supposing a 737 or any other airline passenger jets engines failed at 30,000 ft could it glide down and land safely? What's the odds?
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: North America
Age: 64
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Already happened and more than once.
Read the following link to an incident. It was Air Canada flight 143 involving a large Boeing 767 that lost all engine power and landed safely.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gimli_Glider
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gimli_Glider
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: In an Airplane
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well an Airbus can, as its already happened.
Air Transat Flight 236 dead sticked into the Azores.
Any Aircraft in theory could if done correctly.....they all glide until stopped by ground level.
Air Transat Flight 236 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Air Transat Flight 236 dead sticked into the Azores.
Any Aircraft in theory could if done correctly.....they all glide until stopped by ground level.
Air Transat Flight 236 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: At home
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Any aircraft can glide with out power, you just have fewer option in a bigger aircraft as they come down quicker.
I had an examiner kill both engines on me in a sim ride on a 737 a few years back. There's no procedure, you just have to find somewhere to put it, and fast.
It's so unlikely to ever happen for real, but it sometimes does. A BBJ just went into Riyadh a couple of days ago with it's engines both choking on sand, and the pilots calling a mayday due to zero thrust from either engine. They got it down ok..... and probably found a bottle of hooch pretty fast
I had an examiner kill both engines on me in a sim ride on a 737 a few years back. There's no procedure, you just have to find somewhere to put it, and fast.
It's so unlikely to ever happen for real, but it sometimes does. A BBJ just went into Riyadh a couple of days ago with it's engines both choking on sand, and the pilots calling a mayday due to zero thrust from either engine. They got it down ok..... and probably found a bottle of hooch pretty fast
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: ME
Posts: 5,502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
and the pilots calling a mayday due to zero thrust from either engine. They got it down ok
It would be interesting to know just how much thrust they actually had.
Mutt
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Newcastle, WA, USA
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The ability have a controlled glide and accomplish a landing flare with all engines inoperative is a certification requirement.
A safe landing is not guaranteed though.
A safe landing is not guaranteed though.
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: At home
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It would be interesting to know just how much thrust they actually had.
When the engines quit, they rapidly start to resemble the 30-odd tons of Aluminium they're made from.
Answering the thread title: You'd glide OK in a 747 but a neatly flared landing might be a tad more problematic, though it might not be impossible.
There's no RAT ("windmill") to give you back-up power so you would be relying on the engines themselves windmilling or perhaps imaginative/non standard use of the APU and hydraulic pumps to give you adequate hydraulic power to operate the Flight Controls. It was certainly not a procedure covered in any of the manuals for the 744 variant I flew and I never saw it taught in the simulator in over 20 years on the aircraft .
There's no RAT ("windmill") to give you back-up power so you would be relying on the engines themselves windmilling or perhaps imaginative/non standard use of the APU and hydraulic pumps to give you adequate hydraulic power to operate the Flight Controls. It was certainly not a procedure covered in any of the manuals for the 744 variant I flew and I never saw it taught in the simulator in over 20 years on the aircraft .
I would have thought that any airliner that lost both engines on takeoff would crash straight ahead and not return to land.
I wonder the same thing myself. I can tell you from experience that at 10,000ft on a straight out departure, I did a teardrop onto the reciprocal and fell short by about 10 metres. Not pretty but survivable.
even on a flat gradient you would have to be assured of obstacle clearance and that would require extensive knowledge of the airport environment
when landing straight ahead you at least hopefully have a better guarantee of obstacle avoidance
so, perhaps except in a few rare situations a turnback will not be advisable ans any turning will also increase sink rate
