Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner)
Reload this Page >

Plane Spotters Detained In India

Wikiposts
Search
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

Plane Spotters Detained In India

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Feb 2010, 18:12
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Altrincham
Age: 58
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Plane Spotters Detained In India

Plane spotters from Bristol detained in India


Mr Hampton has photographed planes all over the world

Two plane spotters from Bristol have been detained in India on suspicion of spying. Stephen Hampton, from Keynsham, and Steven Ayres, from St George, sparked suspicion after asking a Delhi hotel for a room overlooking a runway.
The pair were carrying an air traffic control scanner, laptop, binoculars and cameras.
Dan Norris MP is liaising with the Foreign and Commonwealth Office to try to bring the pair home.
Mr Norris, MP for North East Somerset, said of 46-year-old Mr Hampton: "His family are distraught, ever so anxious and worried, understandably, that he can come home soon.
"My job is to try and make that happen with the support of the Foreign Office and our diplomats and officials."
The railway worker's mother, Eileen Cock, said he had travelled all over the world photographing aircraft.
Mrs Cock said she had been expecting her son to arrive home last Tuesday, but received a call from one of his friends to say he and a friend had been detained at the hotel at which they were staying.

Mrs Cock said she was just waiting for the telephone to ring

She said the scanning kit he was carrying was used to track incoming aircraft so they could photograph them at the best moment.
"He was under hotel arrest then for two days," Mrs Cock said.
"In the meantime I've been having various bits of information, both from Stephen and his friends, as to what was happening.
"The next thing I knew he rang me from a vehicle on his way to what I believe was a foreign registration office.
"Then, in great distress, he called me again (to say) that they had been taken to this place and that he didn't know what it was."
Mrs Cock said she believed her son was now at a deportation centre in Delhi.
"I had a rather frantic call the next day to say 'what could I do to please help him out?'," she said.
"I'm just going from minute to minute, hour to hour, waiting for the telephone to ring."
donnlass is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2010, 18:14
  #2 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Altrincham
Age: 58
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I remember aircraft handlers in Dublin getting very upset when we wanted to take a pic of the Ryanair flight we had just come in on.


And we did ask as well.
donnlass is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2010, 19:51
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Larne, UK
Posts: 990
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I remember aircraft handlers in Dublin getting very upset when we wanted to take a pic of the Ryanair flight we had just come in on.


And we did ask as well.
generally any electrical device isnt supposed to be used from the boarding gate door to the aircraft.. such as mobile phones, cameras, mp3 players blah blah.. in the very rare chance a spark is caused when fuel vapour is in the air... ground staff are told to enforce this rule, some do so more than others... cant recall if anything has ever happened though.. more of a precaution

also some airports dont like pictures being took airside without a permit
tigger2k8 is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2010, 21:14
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Altrincham
Age: 58
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for that I didnt realise. Of course there is always a logical reason for such rules and I certainly wouldnt want to endanger an aircraft/personnel particularly with fuel involved.
donnlass is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2010, 21:22
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Scotland (Fife)
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool LogieBear

India. I would not be too concerned being detained in an hotel there for aircraft photography. Far better than Greece or countries ending STAN who I presume detain in worse conditions? Having taken photographs of aircraft worldwide myself, India is friendly.
LogieBear is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2010, 23:34
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Greece
Age: 84
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
even worse, try pulling that sh*it in America!

lets see, a white man in a brown country, "taking pictures of Aircraft while having devices capable of eavesdropping on Aircraft communications"




now switch and have a brown man in America doing the same..

[ He went for a gun! -oh, never mind it was petunia]
tailstrikecharles is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2010, 01:03
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Oslo, Norway
Age: 63
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
tigger2k8
generally any electrical device isnt supposed to be used from the boarding gate door to the aircraft.. such as mobile phones, cameras, mp3 players blah blah.. in the very rare chance a spark is caused when fuel vapour is in the air
Nonsense tigger2k8, or in pure and simple English: bollocks

Jet fuel have autoignition temperature of minimum 210°C, you need an open flame to start a fire and the jet fuel vapor is much heavier than air so one metre over the ground the concentration is way below the "explosive window" under normal outside temperatures. Non of the electronic devices you list can ever reach 210°C and don't emit sparks. No, the reason is quite different. The ground crew want to get you out of harms way as fast as possible, and the airport ground crew can certainly be used better than being day care personnel.

The fire danger card can be used though for piston engined aircraft using avgas and especially during their refueling. Avgas is highly flammable and electric equipment used within the explosive mixture areas must be Ex classified.
LN-KGL is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2010, 02:33
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Larne, UK
Posts: 990
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nonsense tigger2k8, or in pure and simple English: bollocks

Jet fuel have autoignition temperature of minimum 210°C, you need an open flame to start a fire and the jet fuel vapor is much heavier than air so one metre over the ground the concentration is way below the "explosive window" under normal outside temperatures. Non of the electronic devices you list can ever reach 210°C and don't emit sparks. No, the reason is quite different. The ground crew want to get you out of harms way as fast as possible, and the airport ground crew can certainly be used better than being day care personnel.

The fire danger card can be used though for piston engined aircraft using avgas and especially during their refueling. Avgas is highly flammable and electric equipment used within the explosive mixture areas must be Ex classified.
nonsense? then you need to re-write the training for most airport staff in the UK, and no doubt the world.... so your telling me if a passenger was walking under the wing and vapour came out and an electrical device malfunctioned causing a spark that its impossible the vapour wouldn't ignite? the odds of it happening are extremely slim, but why take the chances when vapour is around
tigger2k8 is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2010, 08:00
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: North west UK
Age: 64
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Trying to remember my early days "jet fuel" and diesel are very close with flash points, and auto ignition points.
Flash point is around 62 degrees C and autoignition at about 210 degrees C.
I can't imagine temps that high on an apron, unless it's dripping onto a hot engine.
I would have thought if there was a chance of ignition, it would have happend a long time before you got your camera out!!!!!
You can drop a lit cigarette end into Diesel at ambiant temps and it will go out, don't try it in petrol type fuels though, flash point is about -40 degess C
PA38 is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2010, 13:53
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Shooting Whilst Boarding on the Ramp

I have yelled at at both STN and PIK for taking a shot on the ramp. At PIK the yellow jacket was winding in the line that makes you walk round rather than under the wing and the target was an Israeli AF B707. As I was on home turf I just politely told him I disagreed and walked calmly away and up the rear steps.
At Stansted, one of the Swissport pushback tug crew became animated as I shot a record photo of the Ryanair I was about to board.

Hence I have a procedure now that works very well. Correct lense on and settings ready to go before I leave the lounge. Accept I will not be changing settings or lenses when on the ramp and have a very small window to set up a record shot and shoot, do this quickly. It works for the aircraft I am boarding and anything immediately adjacent. Learn the difference between a quick pause and loitering and be aware when not to even try.

Got off last year at Ciampino and thought better of it. Happy spotting.

As an aside, in Ireland you can quite happily walk under the wing when boarding.
Skipness One Echo is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2010, 14:34
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Manchester
Posts: 891
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cameras and quick shots.

Learn to shoot from the hip, with the camera hanging from your neck.

Most auto focus cameras will give good results, if they are a bit wonky correct in photoshop, simple !

I also agree that the chance of Jet A1 igniting from a spark is absolutely nil.

In fire training at the airport they have to pour petrol onto the Jet A1 first before there is any chance of ignition.
MAN777 is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2010, 00:58
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some places around the world the local authorties are not familar with the hobby of "plane spotting" and seeing someone carry out such can be suspected of spying! I have encounted problems in BKK, SIN and a few other airports around the world. Best idea is to be discreet about your actions and keep the laptop and scanner out of sight. Maybe even have two camera memory cards, one with scenic photos and the other with your plane photos and keep the scenic card handy to show which works well.
gate4 is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2010, 02:41
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Larne, UK
Posts: 990
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In fire training at the airport they have to pour petrol onto the Jet A1 first before there is any chance of ignition.
yes, thats in liquid state, the vapour on the other hand is easy to ignite with a spark... isnt this the reason why fuel tanks have an inerting system? ( Inerting system - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia )
tigger2k8 is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2010, 20:43
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Near Stalyvegas
Age: 78
Posts: 2,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Was it Lord Brabazon who challenged his American counterpart to stand in the American fuel [JP4] whilst Lord B would stand in his [JP1] and drop lighted matches...JP4 declined
chiglet is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2010, 21:05
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kerry Eire
Age: 76
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It most certainly was.
philbky is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2010, 08:10
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,995
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Interesting how this post went straight of topic and those actually arrested were hardly memtioned after in post 1!

The only thing to say - is how stupid can some people be! Something perfectly acceptable in one country may not be in another. Ask first - don't take the risk. I have seen tourists at Indian Airports being approached by armed soldiers telling them not to take photographs. And these guys had scanners - which could well be illegal in India.
Groundloop is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2010, 11:01
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Somewhere over the Rainbow
Posts: 735
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The only thing to say - is how stupid can some people be! Something perfectly acceptable in one country may not be in another. Ask first - don't take the risk. I have seen tourists at Indian Airports being approached by armed soldiers telling them not to take photographs. And these guys had scanners - which could well be illegal in India.
Well said. It is always announced that photography is banned etc etc etc. when on board an Indian flight. Most time Indian airports share infrastructure with Military ones. Also the hotel rooms of this particular hotel overlook the hangar areas of the RAW. IL 76, IAF Embrarers and some covert aircraft or the other are usually parked here. For the uninitiated RAW is the Indian version of the CIA.

It just goes to show that vigilance of civilians is needed in these times. Considering there was a terrorist attack the same day, plus some hotheads have started warning foreigners to come to India for even sport activities it is commendable that the hotel staff correctly identified what these guys were upto ie: photographing and overhearing aircraft movements.

Strange part is that the authorities are figuring out what to book them under. Thankfully not the terrorist act and the more sedate Indian telegraph act. So at least they beleived their story and did not ship them to Guantanomo first
Wannabe Flyer is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2010, 13:46
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: redditch
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
got so say i have little sympathy asking for a room overlooking a runway and having SBS laptop and cameras, in the world we live in nowadays its just asking for trouble.Just because 1 person gets away with it in another country does not mean everyone will its just a case of getting written permission from the right people to say yeah its ok to use and if you dont get it leave it at home!!!

Asking a few simple questions can save alot of hassle and avoid a trip to the local nick
andyjoy is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2010, 15:14
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: crawley
Age: 74
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Doesn t his mothers name Discribe him ??
learjet50 is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2010, 15:26
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Limbricht
Posts: 2,195
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
I take the point about the SBS, but if a hotel in India is built with rooms overlooking a runway then explain to me why a guest shouldn't stipulate a runway view? Oh and a large percentage of hotel guests are in possesion of a laptop these days!

I would guess that they naively carried on with their spotting activities whilst their room was being serviced. Dumb!
Avman is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.