Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner)
Reload this Page >

Heathrow High Winds SAT 14th

Wikiposts
Search
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

Heathrow High Winds SAT 14th

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Nov 2009, 16:44
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: London
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looking at the live arrivals section of the Heathrow website, there are three (don't know which are code-shares) flights from Boston due 07.15 which are still 'delayed'. There are also a number of short-haul flights from Europe which landed late between 16.30 and 17.00.

Sorry for the naive question, but would these aircraft all have simply waited in the holds until they could make the approach?
Nicholas49 is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2009, 17:11
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: London Under EGLL(LHR) 27R ILS
Age: 31
Posts: 500
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
fernanjet,

Yes but I dont know what the diversion is for, Heathrows website is saying nothing - and Its on the ground at FRA as far as I know.
HeathrowAirport is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2009, 17:19
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Always Travelling, Never Arriving
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1) Diversion to Frankfurt isn't that surprising if the flight was from Berlin - not necessarily an LHR Wx issue.

2) Most shorthaul flights would have been held on the ground in Europe with a nightmare slot as opposed to going around in circles in the LHR area. This sort of fun and frolics reduces the flow rate to 38/60 so you know as soon as you arrive somewhere that it may be a while before you get back. Good job it's the weekend and less flights.

3) The 3 0715 BOS flights are all the Virgin flight but with codeshares.
sickBocks is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2009, 18:31
  #24 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: London
Age: 50
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I must admit when i posted this post i thought it would be a good day to watch some good flying.

When will the Met office stop "hyping" up weather "Severe Weather", "weather warning". This was a typical autumn storm nothing out of the blue. Nothing for crew to worry about.

So, when we get a major storm god for bid it will be the end of the world by the the Met Office....

On a lighter note their where some well handled birds today and good reporting from ATC.........

No im not in aviation but the team work to get the birds on the ground was blinding
ukdean is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2009, 18:34
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: On the flightpath
Age: 61
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No strong winds up here in North East England. Cold but bright and sunny this morning; cloudy but mainly dry this afternoon. We'll be happy to accept any diverting aircraft from southern England.
ConstantFlyer is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2009, 18:34
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Essex
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Who remembers the December day when one of the JT9Ds on a Pan Am 747 actually struck the runway at LHR on landing? Could have been 27 December, 1979.
Seat62K is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2009, 18:47
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Near Gatwick
Posts: 479
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We have had quite a few go arounds here at LGW today--VERY GUSTY!! I am sure the EK 15 at lunch time didn't divert(it was a777 not a 767)-it did go around, but pretty sure it went in on the second attempt!
The LGW tower have been really been under pressure today with the thunder and lightening and hail at 09.00ish this am, and the gales since then(it has become a lot calmer here in the last couple of hours!)
Charley B is online now  
Old 14th Nov 2009, 18:58
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bournemouth UK
Age: 49
Posts: 863
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I am sure the EK 15 at lunch time didn't divert(it was a777 not a 767)-it did go around, but pretty sure it went in on the second attempt!
Hmm, I saw the a go around and a member of our crew told me it diverted after a second go around. I've no idea where he got that info from.

And yes, it could easily have been a triple.

Here's hoping for an easier day tomorrow.

SW
Sky Wave is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2009, 19:05
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: London Under EGLL(LHR) 27R ILS
Age: 31
Posts: 500
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
UAE15 EK0015 DXB-LGW A6-ECJ
HeathrowAirport is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2009, 21:21
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<<On a lighter note their where some well handled birds today and good reporting from ATC........>

Any chance of an English translation please? What does ATC "report"?

Thanks.
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2009, 05:44
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Langata, Kenya
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And yes, it could easily have been a triple.
It must have been. EK don't have 767s in their fleet AFAIK.
Lamyna Flo is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2009, 07:37
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: UK
Age: 45
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When will the Met office stop "hyping" up weather "Severe Weather", "weather warning". This was a typical autumn storm nothing out of the blue. Nothing for crew to worry about.
You tell that to the two aircraft I was working into Gatwick who had a -35kt windshear causing them to go-around.
Vortex Issues is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2009, 08:50
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Langata, Kenya
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No im not in aviation
Yes, your previous ridiculous statement quoted by Vortex proves that. And your remark about ATC "reporting" (sic). Better to keep silent and let people think you are a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt
Lamyna Flo is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2009, 09:59
  #34 (permalink)  
Death Cruiser Flight Crew
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Vaucluse, France.
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The aviation met gave a much more realistic forecast: Heathrow and Gatwick TEMPO 1416/1418 20028G45 and Luton 23030G50. It seems the media weather people live in fear of 'Doing a Michael Fish' as someone has already said!

The 0750 Culdrose actual of 21041G63 grabbed the attention.
Georgeablelovehowindia is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2009, 10:23
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 58-33N. 00-18W. Peterborough UK
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quote:
No im not in aviation

Yes, your previous ridiculous statement quoted by Vortex proves that. And your remark about ATC "reporting" (sic). Better to keep silent and let people think you are a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt
Nasty, pointless post. This is 'Spectators and Spotters' where people don't have to be 'in aviation'? You are probably a good example.
forget is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2009, 11:34
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: EGNX
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yes, your previous ridiculous statement quoted by Vortex proves that. And your remark about ATC "reporting" (sic). Better to keep silent and let people think you are a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt
I imagine that the "reporting" remark is referring to the live wind reports that ATC provide to landing aircraft every few seconds during stormy conditions. Not too difficult to work out even if the terminology isn't quite right.
Doors to Automatic is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2009, 14:04
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Doors to automatic. Thank you for that.
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2009, 19:07
  #38 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: London
Age: 50
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whats the point in showing an interest when you get shouted down by what can only be descibed as a xxxx.

LAMYNA

Thanks to to the over guys who stood up,
The remark abour the reporting was with ATC giving Wind speeds/etc,etc

With this thread i am sorry but i thought i posted it spotters corner..
And forgive me but i dont seem to remember mentioning anything about a "vortex" then again what would i know.

I think i will take up Canal boat spotting and have a chat on thier forum. I bet Lam"YNA" is on their as well.
ukdean is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2009, 19:12
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Driving a Train.
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did any find out what the Surface Wind Speed was on the 14/11/09,
I was Listening in, that morning and heard reports of Windshear on Finals for 27R/L.
Cant remember the attitude though.
Malaysian28 is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2009, 19:34
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Manchester
Age: 53
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You should be able to get some sense of what was going on

here Weather History & Data Archive : Weather Underground


There were a number of rotating cells in the region (hence the Essex tornado reports) so gust-wise they could have come from just about anywhere creating some wildly unpredictable localised shear - outflow may even have driven them vertically, which can't have been remotely funny.
Skyfan is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.