Wikiposts
Search
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

IFR in classic jets?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Nov 2009, 12:43
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IFR in classic jets?

Hi chaps.

I was just wondering, given current departure and arrival plates, many giving references to intersections, how to pilots of classic jets manage to follow them?

Some will be equipped with INS which will obviously help, but some (like the 727 I believe) can only navigate VOR to VOR.

Do they just get a little extra direction from ATC?

Thanks in advance
Flamin_Squirrel is offline  
Old 12th Nov 2009, 18:11
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pilots are trained to do just that and although much of the flying is done on autopilot, pilots are perfectly capable of navigating "manually".
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 12th Nov 2009, 19:06
  #3 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
PPRuNe Radar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1997
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In Europe, the aircraft must be equipped with BRNAV (Basic aRea NAVigation) kit if it operates above FL095. This allows it to fly to intersections, etc.

Your 727 would be a very uneconomical beast if it had to stay below FL095 for its flight

For aircraft which lose BRNAV capability (either when airborne or with dispensation obtained before the flight), then ATC have the ability to provide the appropriate assistance.
PPRuNe Radar is offline  
Old 12th Nov 2009, 20:15
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Why would a 727 be limited to VOR to VOR flying? We had IFR certified GPSs on them 20 years ago to replace the OMEGA. There are plenty of older jets with FMSs installed, all just a matter of $$$$. (Sorry, can't get the keyboard to give me a Pound Sterling symbol.)
MarkerInbound is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2009, 07:39
  #5 (permalink)  

Beacon Outbound
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: "Home is were the answer machine is"
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry, can't get the keyboard to give me a Pound Sterling symbol
ALT + 0163
IRRenewal is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2009, 00:08
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In Europe, the aircraft must be equipped with BRNAV (Basic aRea NAVigation) kit if it operates above FL095. This allows it to fly to intersections, etc.

Your 727 would be a very uneconomical beast if it had to stay below FL095 for its flight

For aircraft which lose BRNAV capability (either when airborne or with dispensation obtained before the flight), then ATC have the ability to provide the appropriate assistance.
Interesting! So any such aircraft such as say a 747-200 would need to be retrofitted with BRNAV - the INS alone wouldn't cut it?

Is this a fairly new rule, as aircraft like Concorde never had RNAV?
Flamin_Squirrel is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2009, 05:35
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Two specific types of BRNAV/PRNAV equipment are available for older aircraft (without FMS fitment, such as some early models of the L1011/business jets etc), and these are...

Honeywell HT9100 GPS navigator
Universal UNS-1M GPS navigator

Having personally used both units in the past (and now), they are very reliable units and operate superbly....even transAtlantic/trans Pacific, for which they are both approved as a sole means of naviagation.

Pony up the cash for dual units...a done deal.

Both units have their advantages.
The HT9100 is a color (colour, for you folks in the UK) display and is more user-friendly, IMO.
However, the Universal UNS-1M comes equipped with a worldwide database...it even provides various ATC frequencies, runways lengths, elevation, magnetic variation etc etc of allthe airports in the database (and in the USA there are 9100 of them, all public use, with instrument approaches, SIDS/STARS included...the whole nine yards.

About the only thing missing is a Google Earth view...you have to go to the internet for that.
And, speaking of Google Earth, their new views actually shows the registration number of my private airplane parked in Arizona...if you look very carefully.

NB.
Google Earth, again.
Before the availability of this (and many other military sat.. views, and even before the U-2 aircraft looking at the Russkies...there was the B-36J.
Yes, the 'ole B-36 with ten engines, stripped down to the 'featherweight' model (look on U-tube for views) and equipped with superb cameras that could (and I have personally seen the photos, photographed from 70,000 feet...yes the 'ole B-36 could get this high...just imagine)..my neighbor, Colonel Jim flew some of these flights over China...and the golf balls could clearly be seen, on a golf course, in these photos.
Says Colonel Jim...'you could nearly count the dimples.
1950's technology, folks.

Last edited by 411A; 14th Nov 2009 at 06:11.
411A is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2009, 06:02
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Fragrant Harbour
Posts: 4,787
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
''Interesting! So any such aircraft such as say a 747-200 would need to be retrofitted with BRNAV - the INS alone wouldn't cut it?''

That's correct. And it must have some sort of graphic nav display as well. My company had 747 classics and we had to fit Nav displays. They went the whole hog and fitted glass cockpits. They already had Marconi FMS900 Flight Management Computers fed from GPS updated triple Litton 92 IRS units, so it was an easy modification. But in the end, it gave us nav kit that was better than the 747-400's.
Dan Winterland is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2009, 20:17
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: The No Transgression Zone
Posts: 2,483
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
1950's technology, folks
from 411A

that's why I just love all the wonderful 'New Ideas'
Pugilistic Animus is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2009, 20:22
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: London
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BRNAV?

What about 'Point to Point'? All you need is an RMI/DME & a pencil - a much cheaper solution
Reverserbucket is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2009, 02:59
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: southern california
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They planned each flight on charts using a pencil and a straight edge. During flight they check their position using VORs. Note that VORs are rarely flown directly to or from. They are used for reference by means of triangulation (using two VORs to check your exact position) or by using DME. The advent of GPS systems really took the fun out of old-fashioned VOR planning and navigation. Its much more gratifying to see your destination airport at the end of a manually navigated flight.
airlinersinflight is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2009, 08:11
  #12 (permalink)  
Warning Toxic!
Disgusted of Tunbridge
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 4,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It was more than gratifying, it was positively 'orgasmic' to finally see Bermuda after an Atlantic crossing in a pre-INS era VC10 when the pilot-nav was having trouble fixing position all the way across, couldn't get star shots and the Loran was playing up! There have been at least a couple of airliners since the war that are still out there looking for Bermuda! Even I was roped into desperately counting dots of the Consol long range navigation system- an old German wartime U-boat navigation aid still in use up to the 70s! Your only aim was to find a 400 mile diameter circle floating in the North Atlantic- once there you could pick up the VOR.
Rainboe is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.