Wikiposts
Search
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

News report on bird strike

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Apr 2009, 12:41
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Leeds
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
News report on bird strike

I have just read yet another highly informed and professional news report from our friends at Sky News:

Gaping Hole Left In Plane After Bird Crash - Yahoo! News UK

Quote: "An entire football team feared for their lives after a flock of storks ploughed into their plane."

I would argue that the only thing that should be fearing for its life in that situation is the stork. But then it probably didn't have much time to think about it

Quote: "They felt the plane judder as the pilot fought to keep it under control for an emergency landing."

Fought to keep it under control? I doubt they would even know the extent of the damage until they got it on the ground. As long as the limiting speeds were observed there should be no problem.

Should reporters really be allowed to dramatise such events? No wonder there are so many people who have a fear of flying with such BS being plastered across the news boards. Rant over
purmus is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2009, 12:59
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bird strikes ARE serious, in varying ways from knocking out engines to windshields and airframes.

PM me for a site which has some photo's which might prove convincing, if that's OK with the moderators.
Double Zero is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2009, 13:05
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hants
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've read the report you link to and don't actually think it is
...such BS being plastered...
The incident reportedly happend at a critical stage in flight.
Furthermore, considering the incident just recently that resulted in the Hudson ditching, I don't necessarily agree with your 3rd hand analysis of
I would argue that the only thing that should be fearing for its life in that situation is the stork.
Journalist bashing is all very well, but this report doesn't exactly go to the extent of using such gems as 'pilots wrestling with the controls' or 'narrowly avoiding a school/nunnery/orphanage *delete as appropriate'

The quote, for what it is worth, is from a layman who was a passenger on the flight. Although possibly misguided, it may well be a genuine reaction that they, the passenger, had.
anotherthing is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2009, 13:07
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: A Paddy in Paris
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Storks are big, heavy birds. An aircraft striking a flock of them can very reasonably expect some significant damage.
Fought to keep it under control? I doubt they would even know the extent of the damage until they got it on the ground. As long as the limiting speeds were observed there should be no problem.
I whole heartedly agree that the media take the p**s when reporting such stuff, but where a flock of storks are involved, it could even have been worse.
DrKev is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2009, 13:16
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: long island
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On this side of the pond, the FAA either has or is considering banning such reports entirely.

Earlier this week a flight from Gulfport to Charlotte was cancelled by US AIrways and the following day when I flew the same route I asked why, and was told it was bird strike.
finfly1 is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2009, 14:43
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: France
Posts: 2,315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IIRC, a flock of storks usually flies with more spacing than a flock of geese.

Just the same, if they collected one right on the nose, I do not like to think about the probability of collecting one in each engine as well....

CJ
ChristiaanJ is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2009, 14:44
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK.
Posts: 4,390
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
. . and don't forget: the babies they were carrying could weigh up to eleven pounds
Basil is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2009, 16:18
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
' The babies they are carrying ' - there's always one, good one !

I wonder if the first poster would care to stand in front of a ' chicken gun ', fired by compressed air into canopies and engines, world-wide general test kit.

There are a few urban myths about these things, including a story where the Kingston operatives loaded a chicken for a canopy test, then retired for lunch.

When they returned and fired it, they were surprised at the amount of damage.

It turned out an extremely unfortunate - and surprised - cat had discovered the chicken in the meantime.

Nonetheless, a simple bird strike is serious business, I know of a HS125 which had both engines taken out ( with tragic consequences for people on the ground ) and several fast jet accidents I've heard of, including one Jaguar / Harrier which resulted in the pilot having the canopy shattered & MDC around his neck !
Double Zero is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2009, 16:45
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Leeds
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe I didn't word my rant as well as I could have. I don't doubt for a minute that a bird strike is a serious incident and that it can and has had serious consequences.

What I was trying to say is that press reports, such as this one, are for many people the only source of what happened. As people within the industry we are able to take the reports with a pinch of salt and assess for ourselves the magnitude of the incident. On this occassion it looks like the bird did some damage to the canopy but never compromised the integrity of the flight. The pilot may have tried to take some avoiding action but never had to fight to keep in control of the aircraft.

This glorification of incidents by the press only leads to a greater number of nervous flyers and discourages people from flying.
purmus is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2009, 17:12
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Chedburgh, Bury St.Edmunds
Age: 81
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Would the headline 'aircraft hit a bird and may have some damage' sell as many papers as 'Crew struggle with badly damaged plane as terrified passengers fear for their lives' Go figure......Newspaper propreitors like to sell papers,,,,,
JEM60 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.