Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner)
Reload this Page >

2 QF747's Towed into each other at YMAV

Wikiposts
Search
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

2 QF747's Towed into each other at YMAV

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Nov 2008, 02:30
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2 QF747's Towed into each other at YMAV

From The Herald Sun
Qantas jets in on-ground collision at Avalon Airport | Herald Sun

A QANTAS 747 involved in the Manila mid-air explosion has crashed into another jumbo while being towed at Avalon Airport.

The planes were being towed at the carrier’s Australian heavy maintenance base at Avalon Airport when they crashed into each other about 9.30am this morning.

The jet involved in the Manila emergency in July had been close to being ready to fly again.
hmmm. QANTAS having another experience...

Hopefully it's only superficial damage, It's so sad to see these Queens of the skies limping around.


Last edited by dkaarma; 18th Nov 2008 at 02:32. Reason: formatting
dkaarma is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2008, 03:52
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting... when you damage a plane, Qantas spokesman David Cox said workers involved in the incident had been stood down “pending a full investigation”. . When you sell of the company Dixon said the $A11 billion ($US9 billion) deal from the consortium Airline Partners Australia (APA) had been "clouded by emotion", as board members and management stood to make huge personal gains."The real Achilles' heel was that it got very, very emotional -- principally because I and the senior management team were going to earn tens of millions of dollars as part of it. Go figure.
fix767 is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2008, 04:10
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: PPrune nominee 2011!
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
fix767 the post is about QF747's not about the Qantas selling. Dont turn it into a bashing
Skystar320 is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2008, 04:45
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its no bashing... just seems odd why when an accident occurs, people get stood down and a full investigation occurs, yet, when an intentional act of delibrate greed occurs, its ok. I feel for the ground staff.
fix767 is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2008, 05:10
  #5 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
skystar320,
There is nothing wrong with investigations surrounding incidents.
I think what fix767 is trying to say is that while the actions of the workers at Avalon involved in the incident are being examined who examines the actions of the board and upper management.
This difference might be a bit too subtle for you.
RedTBar is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2008, 05:13
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just a lot of bad luck

I don't feel sorry for the groundies assuming it was their fault. It looks like one of the a/c has turned too wide and then clipped the nose of the other with its wingtip. Bad driving I guess. Unbelievably bad luck for the airline.

OJK just returned from Manila last week, all repairs done, just needed some final fitout of the cabin. Being stuck in Manila for 3 months meant a lot of mould started to appear so they basically replaced all the fabric in the cabin.

Interesting item of note: hundres of plastic bags of peanuts exploded when the a/c decompressed back in July. Must have made quite a mess.
Spotted Reptile is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2008, 05:16
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: PPrune nominee 2011!
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is nothing wrong with investigations surrounding incidents.
I know, what I am trying to say its got nothing to do with the failed Qantas purchase.
Skystar320 is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2008, 05:34
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Downunder
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does anyone have any photographs of the incident?
I just want to add it to my collection.
Shazz-zaam is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2008, 05:36
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RedTBar, that's exactly what i was trying to say. I'm not looking for arguments, nor trying to bring up about the failed bid, lets be fair and investigate the guilty. Thats all.
fix767 is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2008, 05:41
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: sydney
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At the end of the day it all comes down to a failure of company policy and procedures.
QF management is known for hiding behind the P & P manual, so somewhere along the line today the processes management have put in place and and incident has happened.

The unfortunate guys on the floor might get a huge shafting for following the rules that their management have told them to follow.
another superlame is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2008, 05:58
  #11 (permalink)  
TWT
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: troposphere
Posts: 834
Received 34 Likes on 19 Posts
Video

Video - Qantas planes collide at Avalon - Sydney Morning Herald
TWT is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2008, 06:09
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Denmark
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't feel sorry for the groundies assuming it was their fault. It looks like one of the a/c has turned too wide and then clipped the nose of the other with its wingtip. Bad driving I guess.
I do feel sorry for the ground staff unless it is proved they did it with purpose!
Of course an investigation is required.
An investigation will probably answer many questions i.e. was the procedures good enough, were they followed, was it the right equipment used and was it designed probably for the work, did the surface marking play a role, or was it pure reckless handling by one individual person.
We don’t know, and that is why an investigation is required to find the “hole in the cheese”.

Walder
Walder is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2008, 06:22
  #13 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Skystar320,Yep I knew the difference was too subtle for you.

workers involved in the incident had been stood down “pending a full investigation”
Tell me Skystar320,when was the last time a board member was stood down over an incident while it was being investigated?
RedTBar is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2008, 07:40
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: right here
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ouch

one got the radom missings all the way to the pressure bulk and the other looks like a shark took a bite into the LE next to the wingtip device.... no flying for these two for some time
FCS Explorer is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2008, 07:52
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mabye they should just pair up OJK with EBU and both die together??
Sunstar320 is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2008, 08:16
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Planet Earth, mostly
Posts: 467
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
lets be fair and investigate the guilty
In order to be fair, i think its better to have the investigation first, then decide the guilt or otherwise.
etrang is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2008, 08:23
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I do feel sorry for the ground staff unless it is proved they did it with purpose!
Of course an investigation is required.
Whoa there. If they did it on purpose? So if it was accidental, then the poor guys, jeez bad luck there mate you just put 2 jumbos out of commission, but it's okay because you didn't mean it?

Surely that's not what you meant!
Spotted Reptile is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2008, 08:47
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: NSW,Australia
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angry Meeja !!

The Bimbo S.S. reading the Ch. 10 news (Syd tonight) described it as a Qantas CHRASH. Media who'd feed them.
capt.cynical is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.