Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

QANTAS engine problem

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th August 2008 | 08:24
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
From: Bahrain
QANTAS engine problem

I would not like a job in QANTAS' PR or corporate communications department right now. They must have pulled most of their hair out

A Qantas Airways flight landed safely after a problem with one of its engines on a flight from Australia to New Zealand, the company said, the latest in a series of mechanical incidents for the airline.

One of four engines on a Boeing 747-300 from Melbourne was "reduced to idle" speed while the airplane approached Auckland Airport on Wednesday night, Qantas spokeswoman Holly Williams said.

However, the pilot managed to land the aircraft with 219 passengers and 16 crew safely, she said.
Desertia is offline  
Reply
Old 14th August 2008 | 08:36
  #2 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
From: The Green Heart of Europe!
Sounds like a non-event to me
CargoMatatu is offline  
Reply
Old 14th August 2008 | 08:44
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
From: In from the fringe
Non event exactly.....

jones
spierpoint jones is offline  
Reply
Old 14th August 2008 | 09:39
  #4 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 1996
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 743
Likes: 4
From: Check with Ops
One of four engines on a Boeing 747-300 from Melbourne was "reduced to idle" speed while the airplane approached Auckland Airport
Strewth!! Maybe these press people know a lot more about this flying lark than me. I know I haven't got the experience on the 744 that many people have but I find that I have to "reduce to idle" speed all four of my engines during an approach, otherwise I'd never get out of the friggin' Troposphere (or wherever it is I live) and then wouldn't be able to stop the beast on the ground.

Now, the QANTAS product is pretty bloody average and some of their 767s either need turning into Tooheys cans or at least updating to get them into the 1970s with their interiors but this latest rash of QANTAS bashing is just getting REALLY stupid. I was hoping the press would concentrate a bit more of the goings-on in China and calm down a bit with this stupidity in reporting every little decision the guys are making Down Under. Perhaps we could help to stop fanning the flames by posting all these reports (not having a personal 'go', Desertia, but just trying to think how we can help quell the press paranoia).

And, no, I don't fly for QANTAS and never have. Yes, I'm a professional pilot, yes, I fly with QANTAS a lot, no I don't own shares in the Company or have any other interests (apart from getting their 767s updated or putting a 330 on my regular route )
Pontius is offline  
Reply
Old 14th August 2008 | 10:17
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Netherlands, the
This is indeed becoming interesting. Lately almost every operation that differs slightly from standard is reported as being an event or incident especially in case of QF. My advice: stop crying about these kind of things...

DutchOps.com - Aviation Photography and Aircraft Information Database...
Marcel_MPH is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.