Wikiposts
Search
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

Question About A340-500

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Aug 2008, 11:19
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Singapore
Age: 74
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question About A340-500

I've noticed that every A340-500 I've flown as a passenger from Asia to the US has either been all business and premium economy (SG) or business, some premium economy, and 36" pitch on the remaining economy seats towards the back of the a/c (TG).

Someone told me that the reason these aircraft are configured this way is that if they had a full cattle car section of 33" pitch seats there would be CG problems.

Would appreciate if someone with experience could confirm or refute this allegation.

Cheers.
StrongEagle is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2008, 12:07
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Estonia
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am not sure whether it was CG or simply weight. Those A340-500 flights were and are the longest of all flights - 777-200LR does not operate such long routes. On those extremely long flights, there is not enough payload capacity for full cattle car. So the planes must be lightened - SQ had 181 seats total with 64 business and 117 premium economy at 7 abreast, 37 inches pitch, then dropped premium economy altogether, TG with slightly shorter routes had 215 seats total with 60 business, 42 premium economy at 7 abreast and 42 inches pitch and 113 coach at 36 inches pitch - then dropped the plane. Air Canada, Emirates and some others fly A340-500 on less extreme distances, and they can carry full coach seating.
chornedsnorkack is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2008, 12:19
  #3 (permalink)  
Scourge of Bad Airline Management!
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Global Nomad
Age: 55
Posts: 1,094
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Much less to do with weight than marketing.

SQ use the aircraft on routes that have a stopping 747 service; it was seen that passengers would pay extra for the non-stop service, but not in economy. And in any case, who'd want twenty hours in Y? So airlines that use them on longer distances use better classes of seating, simple really.

TA
TwinAisle is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2008, 14:38
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Singapore
Age: 74
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TG with slightly shorter routes had 215 seats total with 60 business, 42 premium economy at 7 abreast and 42 inches pitch and 113 coach at 36 inches pitch - then dropped the plane.
Hope not - I've got an TG SIN-BKK-LAX run set for October 2008 that has me booked on the A340-500 for the BKK-LAX leg... business, so I guess it wouldn't be too much of a big deal to change planes.
StrongEagle is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.