Near miss above london docklands?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: london
Age: 43
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Near miss above london docklands?
I took the following photos of what to me looks like a very near miss above London Docklands on Monday evening.
I don't know much about aviation and spotting planes, so I may be mistaken, but they look pretty darn close to me!! Could it be that one of the pictures shows damage from them touching?!
I'm sure it's possible to work out exactly how close they were, as I have all the exif information from the photos attached. I was using an Olympus e-510 dslr camera, zoomed in to 150mm (300mm equivalent on a 35mm film camera). The photos have been cropped down from full resolution (3648x2736 pixels) to 445x311 pixels.
I'm rather hoping someone is able to calculate how close they were?
I took the photos from the footbridge across Royal Victoria Dock, and I was pointing West (and a touch north) as the plane came in to land in to London City Airport to my East.
The link to Picasa shows the full photos and the plane coming in to land at London City Airport 66 seconds later (also on the same focal length, showing just how close they must have been).
More photos are here:
http://s238.photobucket.com/albums/f...944cropped.jpg
and here:
http://picasaweb.google.com/alexjkerry/20080331Docks/
Thanks,
I don't know much about aviation and spotting planes, so I may be mistaken, but they look pretty darn close to me!! Could it be that one of the pictures shows damage from them touching?!
I'm sure it's possible to work out exactly how close they were, as I have all the exif information from the photos attached. I was using an Olympus e-510 dslr camera, zoomed in to 150mm (300mm equivalent on a 35mm film camera). The photos have been cropped down from full resolution (3648x2736 pixels) to 445x311 pixels.
I'm rather hoping someone is able to calculate how close they were?
I took the photos from the footbridge across Royal Victoria Dock, and I was pointing West (and a touch north) as the plane came in to land in to London City Airport to my East.
The link to Picasa shows the full photos and the plane coming in to land at London City Airport 66 seconds later (also on the same focal length, showing just how close they must have been).
More photos are here:
http://s238.photobucket.com/albums/f...944cropped.jpg
and here:
http://picasaweb.google.com/alexjkerry/20080331Docks/
Thanks,
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: london
Age: 43
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Planes way too close!
Ha ha!
Daily mail editors if you are reading, 500 quid and they're all yours. And yes, come to think of it, they were both heading for T5. And definately BA.
I still think they're too close. With a bit of trigonometry, lengths of planes, and knowledge of air traffic guidelines for safe distances, it should be possible to work out how close they are to a degree of accuracy.
Is it normal to see planes flying like this over a capital city?
Daily mail editors if you are reading, 500 quid and they're all yours. And yes, come to think of it, they were both heading for T5. And definately BA.
I still think they're too close. With a bit of trigonometry, lengths of planes, and knowledge of air traffic guidelines for safe distances, it should be possible to work out how close they are to a degree of accuracy.
Is it normal to see planes flying like this over a capital city?
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
<<I don't know much about aviation>>
Then absolutely nothing more needs to be said.......
<<I still think they're too close. With a bit of trigonometry, lengths of planes, and knowledge of air traffic guidelines for safe distances, it should be possible to work out how close they are to a degree of accuracy.>>
For Heavens sake stop going on about something you know nothing about...
Then absolutely nothing more needs to be said.......
<<I still think they're too close. With a bit of trigonometry, lengths of planes, and knowledge of air traffic guidelines for safe distances, it should be possible to work out how close they are to a degree of accuracy.>>
For Heavens sake stop going on about something you know nothing about...
ThRedBearOne
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where my heart is.
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
With a bit of trigonometry, lengths of planes, and knowledge of air traffic guidelines for safe distances, it should be possible to work out how close they are to a degree of accuracy.
And even then they are still. safely. separated!!!
Read up on foreshortening with the use of long lenses. You might find it interesting.
Did I bite?
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Near Stalyvegas
Age: 78
Posts: 2,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
nibble nibble
I was using an Olympus e-510 dslr camera, zoomed in to 150mm (300mm equivalent on a 35mm film camera).
More likely 225mm.
More likely 225mm.
watpiktch
Last edited by chiglet; 1st Apr 2008 at 22:01. Reason: syntax I won't pay it
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne
Age: 38
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Quote: MrPhotoMan:"I don't know much about aviation and spotting planes, so I may be mistaken, but they look pretty darn close to me!! Could it be that one of the pictures shows damage from them touching?!"
I hate to be pedantic, but why if you know nothing about aviation or plane spotting are you a member of an aviation related forum?
I hate to be pedantic, but why if you know nothing about aviation or plane spotting are you a member of an aviation related forum?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: london
Age: 43
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for all your comments.
I think I may have sussed out what the apparent 'damage from impact' is on the photo:
The Flying Stool, your name sparked a brain wave. Of course, 'stool'. Surely it is a passenger flushing the toilet coincidentally just after the planes have 'near missed'?
I think I may have sussed out what the apparent 'damage from impact' is on the photo:
The Flying Stool, your name sparked a brain wave. Of course, 'stool'. Surely it is a passenger flushing the toilet coincidentally just after the planes have 'near missed'?
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What about the near miss over London yesterday involving a number of red aircraft? Apparently, they were only a few feet apart at one point.
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In my own little world
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Too fast indeed.............many moons ago I tried to take photographs of those 'red planes', not quite a box brownie but an old thing which my dad thought was state of the art!
All I got , after waiting the 10 days or so for them to be developed, was a little puff of red smoke in the corner of one photo!
I did however have some very lovely clouds in the sky pictures
All I got , after waiting the 10 days or so for them to be developed, was a little puff of red smoke in the corner of one photo!
I did however have some very lovely clouds in the sky pictures