Gatwick Thread
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: LGW
I saw it too, I even stopped watching Countdown to have a look.
I heard it was 'testing the ILS.'
That came from a despatcher. I'll see if I can find out a more definitive answer tonight, as I'm not sure that's what the A/C was doing or not. I initially thought it might have been an emergency, but Tower was quiet and ground movements continued as normal. Oh and it didn't land
I heard it was 'testing the ILS.'
That came from a despatcher. I'll see if I can find out a more definitive answer tonight, as I'm not sure that's what the A/C was doing or not. I initially thought it might have been an emergency, but Tower was quiet and ground movements continued as normal. Oh and it didn't land
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,980
Likes: 0
From: Gatwick
I thought that at first, but it was the couple of orbits of the cargo sheds, and 130's/140's that seemed a bit odd. I have seen that white thing with big lights on it in strange places checking out landing aids (sorry, I'm no spotter and it had props on it and didn't look like a Spitfire), but this looked like a 2/4 seat single.
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
From: UK
Errr, Litebulbs, Gatwick lies within an ATZ surrounded by Class D airspace.
Neither of these preclude any light a/c with a clearance from routing over the airfield. We're starting to get a bit paranoid if we're thinking a light a/c is a weapon of mass destruction aren't we? There are hundreds of them up there on a sunny day and, as mentioned, all entitled to transit Gatwick's airspace. Should they all be grounded?
Besides, if it really was going to be used for such purposes, I doubt they'd bother with the inconvenience of calling up air traffic first for a clearance and also there are far tastier targets just a few miles further north.
Neither of these preclude any light a/c with a clearance from routing over the airfield. We're starting to get a bit paranoid if we're thinking a light a/c is a weapon of mass destruction aren't we? There are hundreds of them up there on a sunny day and, as mentioned, all entitled to transit Gatwick's airspace. Should they all be grounded?
Besides, if it really was going to be used for such purposes, I doubt they'd bother with the inconvenience of calling up air traffic first for a clearance and also there are far tastier targets just a few miles further north.
Last edited by Roffa; 24th June 2007 at 15:39.
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: Sussex
With regards to the light a/c.
It was one or more controllers who decided to get up at silly o'clock and have a closer look at Gatwick than they would normally be able to.
It was held to the north of the field VFR until a gap in the inbounds, and then did a couple of orbits overhead.
Litebulbs, it was all perfectly legal, just not something you see during the day because it's too busy to allow. Hence the early start.
To the pilot who questioned where my sense of humour was, in response to my lack of reply to his 'witty' comments about said a/c.
It left the tower with Elvis at 0214, closely followed by my will to live.
It was one or more controllers who decided to get up at silly o'clock and have a closer look at Gatwick than they would normally be able to.
It was held to the north of the field VFR until a gap in the inbounds, and then did a couple of orbits overhead.
Litebulbs, it was all perfectly legal, just not something you see during the day because it's too busy to allow. Hence the early start.
To the pilot who questioned where my sense of humour was, in response to my lack of reply to his 'witty' comments about said a/c.
It left the tower with Elvis at 0214, closely followed by my will to live.
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: LGW
The strange thing was that what litebulbs and I saw was the light a/c (I think a PA28) doing orbits and what looked like some pretty steep turns over the apron, not anywhere near the ILS beam at that range.
The a/c could have finished checking the ILS (which I assume would at some point involve flying an ILS approach at least in part) and the crew were maybe taking some pictures, or dare I say it, having some fun. It certainly looked like fun...
The a/c could have finished checking the ILS (which I assume would at some point involve flying an ILS approach at least in part) and the crew were maybe taking some pictures, or dare I say it, having some fun. It certainly looked like fun...
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: Sussex
Mr Person.
Just a remark about it misidentifying Redhill and if it was landing at some blokes strip (presumably Vallance).
Was too long into a long night shift to engage in banter so I just stated exactly what the light a/c was doing.
I think the pilot replied "where's your sense of humour? Could be wrong though. No big deal.
Ratatat.
Can I ask what was said by the pilot on the ground that he thought to be funny about the airborne aircraft?
Was too long into a long night shift to engage in banter so I just stated exactly what the light a/c was doing.
I think the pilot replied "where's your sense of humour? Could be wrong though. No big deal.
Ratatat.
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 18,575
Likes: 4
From: UK
No probs. The 'boss' "gave" us the thread
Post as you wish, but we do not want to expand this to a 'conspiracy' thread. If you wish to pursue that line, I suggest Jet Blast would be better and I'm sure you'll get some takers there.
Post as you wish, but we do not want to expand this to a 'conspiracy' thread. If you wish to pursue that line, I suggest Jet Blast would be better and I'm sure you'll get some takers there.