BAE 146 , was an unsuccessful a/c ?
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
flew on a LH type MAN to Munich last week. Full flight therefore all middle seats used - lots of unhappy faces.
Two hours cramped in the middle seat between two fat Germans
Possibly the most uncomfortable flight ever (statement includes Russian planes). At 12 stone, I should not be in a position where there is not enough shoulder space to take a deep breath. Felt ill when I got off.
I stand by previous comments and my desire not to fly on these things.
Two hours cramped in the middle seat between two fat Germans
Possibly the most uncomfortable flight ever (statement includes Russian planes). At 12 stone, I should not be in a position where there is not enough shoulder space to take a deep breath. Felt ill when I got off.
I stand by previous comments and my desire not to fly on these things.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: at the end of the bar
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Groundloop
How about some figures for some British built jet airlineres:
VC-10/Super VC-10 54 built
Trident 1/2/3 117 built
BAC 111 235 built + 9 in Romania
BAe 146 221 built
Avro RJ 170 built
146/RJ total 391 built + 3 RJX
VC-10/Super VC-10 54 built
Trident 1/2/3 117 built
BAC 111 235 built + 9 in Romania
BAe 146 221 built
Avro RJ 170 built
146/RJ total 391 built + 3 RJX
Which makes me think - did post-Comet British jet airliner designers only study T-tails at college? (DH/HS/BAE125 fits the pattern too!)
