Air Canada's naked 76
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Well, this is cheaper than a Personal Title!
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Air Canada's naked 76
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: _
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It looks like s***e. It looks worse than the "duck egg blue" incarnation. "Give us the cheapest paint you've got...oh no, sorry, no money left..scrap that idea as well, no paint today thanks."
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Must agree looks smashing....
Now the economics:-
2000 man hours @ lets say $200 per hour = $400,000
+
Materiels {any one have a guess here??}
+
Down time / non revenue 12 days unless combined with major checks
+
Lest say a round $500,000 K / $24,000 = 20 years to break even
Yep good scheme where do I sign it off
M
Now the economics:-
2000 man hours @ lets say $200 per hour = $400,000
+
Materiels {any one have a guess here??}
+
Down time / non revenue 12 days unless combined with major checks
+
Lest say a round $500,000 K / $24,000 = 20 years to break even
Yep good scheme where do I sign it off
M
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Manchester
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It looks 'orrible from a distance, god knows what it looks like close up!! Naked aeroplanes are rather like naked people, the older they get the worse they look and Air Canada has a very old fleet. This must be like seeing your Granny on page three!!
Rgds Dr.I. (Blessed with the body of Adonis)
Rgds Dr.I. (Blessed with the body of Adonis)
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: On a radial
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
personally i like the look of it, shows off the "pure engineering". yeah looks a little grubby, but it harks back to the "golden era"
One Q though, unprotected Alluminium = oxidation and corrosion on exposure to water etc, so i'm guessing there is also some kinda protective coating applied also = extra costs.....
One Q though, unprotected Alluminium = oxidation and corrosion on exposure to water etc, so i'm guessing there is also some kinda protective coating applied also = extra costs.....
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Wet Coast
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
oxidation and corrosion on exposure to water etc, so i'm guessing there is also some kinda protective coating applied
The Cooler King
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: In the Desert
Posts: 1,703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Love it!
Very nostalgic - reminds me of being young and brings back all the good vibes of why I wanted to be a pilot, which is fast being ripped away by technology and those stupid glass cockpits - give me a clapped out DC-8 over an A380 any day.
Very nostalgic - reminds me of being young and brings back all the good vibes of why I wanted to be a pilot, which is fast being ripped away by technology and those stupid glass cockpits - give me a clapped out DC-8 over an A380 any day.
Rebel PPRuNer
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Toronto, Canada (formerly EICK)
Age: 51
Posts: 2,834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
AfricanDude - doesn't seem to hurt AA much operating bare. Can't say I like the new scheme - at least the "designers" can't screw up bare metal much.
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Heathrow
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When you look at aluminium you are looking at an oxide coating. You never see pure aluminium in day to day life as it oxidises so quickly. It won't "rust away" like steel, the worst you'll get is a pitting of the surface and that is only in a salt environment. American's aircraft do pretty well.
Eight Gun Fighter
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Western Approaches
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yup, it's called "Alclad" in various grades. It has to be handled very carefully as the coating is so thin. One scratch and that section of metal becomes scrap.
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: エリア88
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If I remember correctly, the fuel savings for using an unpainted 747 are about 3% annually.
THE JAPAN TIMES - Unpainted planes are more cost-effective and environmentally friendly than painted ones, Japan Airlines said Monday after a nearly 10-year study on the performance of an unpainted 747 cargo plane. The plane, introduced in August 1992, has helped the company cut back on paint and other chemicals, and has saved up to 2 million yen a year on fuel expenses as it is about 200 kg lighter without paint. JAL repaints its other planes every six years. The company plans to compile the results of the study in spring. U.S. airlines such as American Airlines and Northwest Airlines also operate unpainted cargo planes. But the companies regularly have to mobilize dozens of employees to polish the planes' bodies to prevent corrosion and rusting. JAL originally began the study to determine how long the interval should be in polishing the body. The airline gradually increased the interval from four months but found the rate of corrosion was unaffected even if polishing was conducted at one-year intervals, adding that scratches are easier to see on the unpainted plane. The company said it plans to operate unpainted passenger planes in the future.
THE JAPAN TIMES - Unpainted planes are more cost-effective and environmentally friendly than painted ones, Japan Airlines said Monday after a nearly 10-year study on the performance of an unpainted 747 cargo plane. The plane, introduced in August 1992, has helped the company cut back on paint and other chemicals, and has saved up to 2 million yen a year on fuel expenses as it is about 200 kg lighter without paint. JAL repaints its other planes every six years. The company plans to compile the results of the study in spring. U.S. airlines such as American Airlines and Northwest Airlines also operate unpainted cargo planes. But the companies regularly have to mobilize dozens of employees to polish the planes' bodies to prevent corrosion and rusting. JAL originally began the study to determine how long the interval should be in polishing the body. The airline gradually increased the interval from four months but found the rate of corrosion was unaffected even if polishing was conducted at one-year intervals, adding that scratches are easier to see on the unpainted plane. The company said it plans to operate unpainted passenger planes in the future.
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 783
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mark, what I was trying to get PaperTiger to think about was the very fact that there is Alclad applied - not that they would NOT operate the aircraft, rather that they would have ensured that there was no way it would corrode. FWIW, I preferred the duck-egg blue!
Rebel PPRuNer
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Toronto, Canada (formerly EICK)
Age: 51
Posts: 2,834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Apparently the next aircraft up, fin 618, had some test areas stripped - the surface did not polish well so it will not be stripped as the other one was.
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Wet Coast
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
what I was trying to get PaperTiger to think about
Most kind of you to try and help me with my thought processes
Alclad is metallurgically bonded aluminium or aluminium alloy coating which is anodic to the core alloy to which it is bonded, thus electrolytically protecting the core alloy against corrosion. You don't just slap it on with a brush.
There are lacquers which can be applied for added protection and/or appearance. I doubt AC has gone to the trouble, and as a previous poster pointed out, airliners do not "corrode", they fatigue.
Most kind of you to try and help me with my thought processes
Alclad is metallurgically bonded aluminium or aluminium alloy coating which is anodic to the core alloy to which it is bonded, thus electrolytically protecting the core alloy against corrosion. You don't just slap it on with a brush.
There are lacquers which can be applied for added protection and/or appearance. I doubt AC has gone to the trouble, and as a previous poster pointed out, airliners do not "corrode", they fatigue.
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 783
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
PaperTiger,
"The common name for a type of clad wrought aluminum products, such as sheet and wire, with coatings of high-purity aluminum or an aluminum alloy different from the core alloy in composition. The coatings are anodic to the core so they protect exposed areas on the core electrolytically during exposure to corrosive environments." (Google - "define:ALCLAD")
I think you are supposed to reference your sources!!
With respect to corrosion, all metals are susceptible to it if there is an environment containing corroding elements (e.g. salt) and humidity. Airliners do corrode; they corrode faster as a result of intergranular corrosion which propogates during the repeated cyclic loading encountered in successive flights - corrosion fatigue. If an airline, such as Air Canada, does not take some measure of protection against it then it can shorten the life of the aircraft. I can't be sure, but I wouldn't bet on any airline sitting down with two graphs, one showing service entry dates for the A380, the other showing lifetime of 767's based on accelerated corrosion fatigue, and identifying whether it's worth the risk to not bother with the protective procedure. I would bet that they would be more interested in preserving their asset, so that after all the effort spent on reducing its weight, what with all the changing of the core composition and clever anodic things the man in the suit making the finiancial decisions can see some type of payback!
Whether corrosion is prevented by cladding, diffusion bonding processes or by electrolytic adjustment of the metal properties to make it less susceptible to reaction with its environment, or even by protecting it from corroding elements in the first instance with some form of paint coating, is irrelevant. The thin-walled skin structure through which the airframe load path runs must be preserved.
What I wanted you "to think about" was that Air Canada will be aware of this and will have compensated for it somehow. I was not attacking you personally, merely offering my opinion as a materials engineer.
Alclad is metallurgically bonded aluminium or aluminium alloy coating which is anodic to the core alloy to which it is bonded, thus electrolytically protecting the core alloy against corrosion. You don't just slap it on with a brush.
I think you are supposed to reference your sources!!
With respect to corrosion, all metals are susceptible to it if there is an environment containing corroding elements (e.g. salt) and humidity. Airliners do corrode; they corrode faster as a result of intergranular corrosion which propogates during the repeated cyclic loading encountered in successive flights - corrosion fatigue. If an airline, such as Air Canada, does not take some measure of protection against it then it can shorten the life of the aircraft. I can't be sure, but I wouldn't bet on any airline sitting down with two graphs, one showing service entry dates for the A380, the other showing lifetime of 767's based on accelerated corrosion fatigue, and identifying whether it's worth the risk to not bother with the protective procedure. I would bet that they would be more interested in preserving their asset, so that after all the effort spent on reducing its weight, what with all the changing of the core composition and clever anodic things the man in the suit making the finiancial decisions can see some type of payback!
Whether corrosion is prevented by cladding, diffusion bonding processes or by electrolytic adjustment of the metal properties to make it less susceptible to reaction with its environment, or even by protecting it from corroding elements in the first instance with some form of paint coating, is irrelevant. The thin-walled skin structure through which the airframe load path runs must be preserved.
What I wanted you "to think about" was that Air Canada will be aware of this and will have compensated for it somehow. I was not attacking you personally, merely offering my opinion as a materials engineer.