Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

A380 - combined threads

Old 17th Apr 2005, 15:03
  #81 (permalink)  
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Sao Paulo
Age: 75
Posts: 792
Oxymoron? Hmm.

I can't help remembering how the 380 project was pooh-poohed on here as soon as it surfaced, and that much of the ridicule came - and continues to do so - from UK posters. Now she's begun taxiing tests the tide almost seems to be turning to patriotic support.

Personally I hope the A380 is a huge success, that the project does make a profit and that it creates a new paradigm in commercial aviation, bringing in more passengers and more jobs. However, I wouldn't forget that it's a colossal gamble, with a large part of the stake put up by taxpayers who had no choice in the matter. It had damn well better work.

If it doesn't, well, shades of Concorde.
broadreach is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2005, 16:06
  #82 (permalink)  
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: France
Posts: 27
Direct link:
or mms://stream1.m6.fr.ipercast.net/m6.fr/6minutes/d/31/d050415190000SARAV3100002.wmv
Cut/Past and open it in media player if clicking doesn't work.
nyt is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2005, 16:52
  #83 (permalink)  
Join Date: May 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 125
Thanks for the link nyt; great to see it moving courtesy of those 4 massive RRs
FunkyMunky is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2005, 18:09
  #84 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Roberts Creek,B.C.
Posts: 36
Are they trying to imply that Boeing is not receiving any government monies and is a private venture without any corporate welfare ?
Any company that big only exists at the pleasure of the various governments and financial support is only a small part of a companies viability.
2R is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2005, 18:17
  #85 (permalink)  

Rebel PPRuNer
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Toronto, Canada (formerly EICK)
Age: 47
Posts: 2,827
How many airports the A380 is planned to operate to have Cat3 already? Surely virtually all of them? We're not talking about a regional jet here.
MarkD is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2005, 18:46
  #86 (permalink)  
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 8,319
Errrrr.... Once companies get that big, they ARE the government
Sunfish is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2005, 22:12
  #87 (permalink)  
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: the night sky
Posts: 624
No, we're not talking about a RJ. We are talking though, about every possible alternate, both destination and en route.
unwiseowl is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2005, 22:41
  #88 (permalink)  
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 29
very informative post. You know that it is overweight by 20 tonnes? Who told you?
And you also know it's underperforming when it hasn't even flown yet?
Please spare us any further cr*p like this.
El lute is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2005, 22:48
  #89 (permalink)  
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Not quite Sure
Posts: 156
Completely agree with you El lute...
To many wannabee's here on this forum that comment on stuff they don't even have a slightest clue what they're talking about.
Sad but true.....
kooyheier is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2005, 22:55
  #90 (permalink)  

Humus Motor
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: A little place called Samsonite
Posts: 201
Whoops, got the can opener out again - yum, these worms look great!

Sorry guys and gals - I heard this ugly rumour from a chap whose airline has ordered the A380 and it's just the crew-room talk .. and it does say rumours and news!

El lute - perfect summation.
Earthmover is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2005, 22:56
  #91 (permalink)  

Rebel PPRuNer
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Toronto, Canada (formerly EICK)
Age: 47
Posts: 2,827

surely the autoland stipulation is to discourage handflying where autoland is available? If 380 was to be banned from non-autoland airports I think the matter would have arisen well before now.

It is sadly unromantic that beancounters don't like handflying but it is up to training and sim time to maintain currency so the statistically safer option is retained for passenger operation.
MarkD is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2005, 23:11
  #92 (permalink)  
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: North West, UK
Age: 53
Posts: 711

Check your PM

I sent you a PM last week
EGCC4284 is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2005, 23:59
  #93 (permalink)  
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: UK (South Coast).
Posts: 33
Been watching the network to see whether the rumour would emerge....

Looks like there's something in what puf m'call says....

Just caught a conversation with an engineer who say's the figure is closer to 30 tonnes and first flight is delayed until June.

Apparently, they've weighed it - but I can't believe it's that much overweight as it would be an absolute disaster and complete oversight for the project.

Anyone else got anything on this?
Quarternion. is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2005, 02:09
  #94 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Fantasy Island
Posts: 555

Yes, because if the first flight had been delayed until June....

....they would of course be hurtling up and down TLS' runways at ever higher speeds on a daily basis....for the next 6 weeks?

Doubt it.
BahrainLad is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2005, 05:25
  #95 (permalink)  
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 104
pff m'call

hear the one about the dog that bit the hand that fed it?
Mr Toad is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2005, 07:40
  #96 (permalink)  
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: London, UK
Posts: 329
The UK's finest are at it again

Kuningen, this is nothing to do with the British press. They are doing their job - reporting the contents of a US report on the A380.

The fact that it's biased against Airbus is nothing to do with the Times. The journalist didn't write the study - it is an American-backed analysis as is clearly stated in the opening paragraph.

Beside, the Times went to Airbus for a response - that's called balanced reporting.

The report's authors are all identified in the article, and a bit of Googling will give you their contact details. If you don't like the Americans' conclusions, take it up with them and please stop shooting the messenger.
Konkordski is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2005, 08:02
  #97 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: guernsey
Posts: 134

Perhaps Airbus were slow to react - but what would you have them do - respond to something they hadn't read? Even the Seattle press manage a more balanced perspective:


The messenger isn't worth the bullet.
kuningan is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2005, 08:38
  #98 (permalink)  
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Io
Posts: 420
What really makes me laugh is the fact the Emirates have ordered 45 of them. A muslim airline flying a pig!!!!
I'm not a commercial pilot or wannabee, however I'm sure that those who are and happen to be Muslim are really impressed with that comment.

As an aside I hope the A380 proves successful both in performance and commercial viability.
Maxflyer is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2005, 09:13
  #99 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Vilha Abrao
Posts: 507
A380, no rudder?

Heard from a taxi-driver of Toloose, A380 will not have a rudder. Instead it will have two FEYCS (Fully electronical Yaw Control System) which will receive Yaw data from the IRS and command the outermost spoilers and the FADECS for asymmetric thrust to counteract for Yaw.

catchup is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2005, 09:32
  #100 (permalink)  
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 86
Hmmm saw a photo in flight, and it did look rudder-less.

(or perhaps the rudder was hard over to one side and therefor behind the main body of the fin?).

Never heard of FEYCS before... Can anyone shed any light on this?

Perhaps its time to change my name!
dreamingA380 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.