Wikiposts
Search
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

Etops

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th May 2005, 05:08
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: M'sia
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Etops

Hi,

Everyone knows that the B777 meets the ETOPS requirements.My question is that are there any other aircrafts which meet ETOPS requirements?Also,are there still any Russian aircrafts being manufactured?I think aircraft manufacturing in Russia was very active during the Soviet times....What's the scenario now?Thanx.
Ghostrider777 is offline  
Old 25th May 2005, 07:34
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Lulsgate regional
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ETOPS stands for Extended Twin engine OPerationS. Basically it means that twin engined aircraft can fly for long distances over water as long as they are within a certain amount of flying time from a suitable airfield should the aircraft suffer an engine failiure. Depending on the aircraft the times can be 60min, 80min, 138min, 180min or in the case of the latest B777 207mins.

As for aircraft certified for etops:-

A319CJ
A330
B737BBJ
B757
B767
B777

There are more to that list and I'm sure someone will correct me but that is the basics of it
BRS_Dispatch is offline  
Old 25th May 2005, 09:24
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Until recently only 120 mins (diversion time on one engine from actual position to the nearest suitable airfield) was available on the A320 Family.
A319, A320 and A321 can now all be equipped for ETOPS up to 180 minutes if required by an operator. A318 will also be available so equipped soon if required.

ETOPS has two sides; the aircraft and the operator and both have to be OK to allow ETOPS. For the above aircraft, it's an option requiring a bit more fire suppression for the holds and things like that but it's no big deal.
The MEL and some maintenance elements have a different and more stringent set of rules but operating to that standard is operator dependent, not aircraft and requires the operator to be approved.
saman is offline  
Old 25th May 2005, 09:32
  #4 (permalink)  
Warning Toxic!
Disgusted of Tunbridge
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 4,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Only two engines? Allowing one engine for three hours?...........With people on board?......They should be reported to the FAA immediately! If they object so much to a 747 on three engines NOT doing an immediate emergency landing, and let these airlines set off on two (!!!), well what can I say? My flabber is totally ghasted!
Rainboe is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.