Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner)
Reload this Page >

KLM flight turns back to AMS because of "abnormal vibrations" witnessed by PAX

Wikiposts
Search
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

KLM flight turns back to AMS because of "abnormal vibrations" witnessed by PAX

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Apr 2005, 07:19
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The Attic
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Snoop KLM flight turns back to AMS because of "abnormal vibrations" witnessed by PAX

Apparently yesterday or last night a KLM flight that was due to cross the Atlantic bound for JFK turned back because passengers witnessed "abnormal vibrations" in one of the wings. Cabin crew was alerted, who in turn reported it to the flightdeck. After deliberating with KLM OCC the captain elected to turn back to Schiphol for a precautionary landing.

Granted, passenger observations are never to be neglected (smoke, fire), but how the hell would a PAX be able to tell the difference between normal and abnormal vibrations in the wings? Most people I know are ready to freak out when they see any rate of wing vibration at all.

Last edited by A-FLOOR; 21st Apr 2005 at 07:56.
A-FLOOR is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2005, 08:02
  #2 (permalink)  
Ohcirrej
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: This is the internet FFS.........
Posts: 2,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe it was flapping like a hummingbird on amphetamines?
Jerricho is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2005, 11:11
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: netherlands
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

Where did you get this information? There is nothing on radio, tv, or even the KLM employee's website.
sleeper is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2005, 12:17
  #4 (permalink)  

Coppula eam se non posit acceptera jocularum
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Northumberland, UK
Age: 61
Posts: 293
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lightbulb

but how the hell would a PAX be able to tell the difference between normal and abnormal vibrations in the wings?
Interested frequent flyer who has spent thousands of hours looking at a wing sees something different from normal and decides it might be at least worth mentioning to the cabin crew?
Evening Star is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2005, 12:51
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Holland
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They did have a good observation ability as both the Cabin Crew and Cockpit crew agreed!! So what is your point??
Dutchie is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2005, 12:58
  #6 (permalink)  

Coppula eam se non posit acceptera jocularum
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Northumberland, UK
Age: 61
Posts: 293
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So what is your point??
Me or A-FLOOR?

If my point, some passengers do know enough to spot a problem and not be hysterical about it.
Evening Star is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2005, 13:43
  #7 (permalink)  
Final 3 Greens
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
A Floor

I am a FQTV and in 2003, I saw a seal detach and depart the inboard flap of an A320 during takeoff. I told the steward who told the FD and the FO came, asked me what I saw and then said no prob, thanks for telling us, we'll report it to maintenance. No hysterics, just good airmanship.

25 years ago, i saw oil running out of the inboard Dart on a Viscount. Same thing.

Two incidents, no hysterics, but safety is no accident and we are all responsible in our own way, expert or non.
 
Old 21st Apr 2005, 14:47
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Perm any one from 3 !
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Time to worry F3G was when you didn't see oil running from the dart - it was probably empty (joking only, I agree)
TimS is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2005, 16:26
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: below sea-level . . . (and on page 32).
Age: 56
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question return

A Floor,

again .. where from .. the info .. ?
traveler is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2005, 16:54
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: england- up north (where it's grim)
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
stream of oil from ryanair 737 200

some time ago i was sat window seat just behind the wing on an old 737-200.

noticed quite a lot of oil coming from the engine cowling, thought nothing of it. after about 15 minutes, oil still coming out at the same rate, i thought i should mention it to the cabin crew.

i did it in such a way as to not alarm anyone more matter of fact. in my experience there seemed to be a bit more coming out than there should be. (yes i know a little oil goes a long way)

cabin crew, "thanks a lot i will tell the flightdeck"

returned short time later, FO looks out of window, goes hmmm a few times and then pronounced - nothing to worry about.

erm, thats about it really. i did wonder how much ryanair must spend on engine oil and maintenance in general.


regards


TFC
the_flying_cop is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2005, 18:54
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Observed a similar thing in an SAA 737-200 a few years back. I was told it was quite normal for JT8's to release a bit of oil like that.
JamesT73J is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2005, 19:57
  #12 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The Attic
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry for the long wait, I got this info from a website known to be associated with the Dutch tabloid newspaper De Telegraaf.

Struck me as odd as well not seeing this gem anywhere else... I suppose that answers all of your questions
A-FLOOR is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2005, 00:57
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The news is also published by trouw (novum). Although it is slightly different:
Vliegtuig keert terug na knikkende vleugel


(Novum) - De KLM heeft woensdag een vliegtuig terug laten keren naar Schiphol. Passagiers merkten op dat een van de vleugels van het toestel een 'knikkende' beweging maakte. KLM-woordvoerder Hugo Baas zegt donderdag dat de gezagvoerder na inspectie van de co-piloot besloot terug te vliegen naar de luchthaven, hoewel er geen alarmmelding op de apparatuur was te zien.

Het toestel was twintig minuten onderweg en vloog boven de Atlantische Oceaan toen het vermeende euvel werd opgemerkt. De passagiers zijn later alsnog met andere vluchten naar New York vervoerd. Eenmaal aan de grond heeft KLM een onderzoek ingesteld, maar niets vreemds kunnen constateren. Baas houdt de mogelijkheid open dat een condensstreep op de vleugel een reflectie veroorzaakte, waardoor het leek dat de vleugel knikte.
+-babel fish:
Plane returns after nodding wing

(Novum) - Wednesday the KLM has returned a plane to Schiphol. Passengers noticed that one of the wings of the plane made a ' nodding ' movement. Klm-spokesman Hugo boss say Thursday that of the after inspection of the copilot decided to the airport, fly back although there was see no reporting of emergency on equipment.

The plane was twenty minutes underway and flew above the Atlantic ocean then the alleged problem was noticed. The passengers have been later still transported with other flights to New York. Once to the ground KLM has established a research, but can observe nothing strange. Boss keeps open the possibility that a line of condensation on the wing caused a reflection, as a result of which seemed that the wing nodded.
last week the plane to mexico has been send back... does anyone believe in conspiracy theories?
gevallen vogel is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2005, 01:04
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
last week the plane to mexico has been send back... does anyone believe in conspiracy theories?
Well give it a try at linking the two and I'll tell you if I believe it
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2005, 08:22
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: bedlam
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FLYING COPPER - the same thing happened to me as SLF 3-4 years ago on a RYR B732 DUB-LTN sector, exactly as you describe!
ALLDAYDELI is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2005, 10:15
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
last week the plane to mexico has been send back... does anyone believe in conspiracy theories?
Well give it a try at linking the two and I'll tell you if I believe it
are you serious? do you really don't see it?
gevallen vogel is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2005, 15:56
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: maastricht
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The PAX was a friend of mine's father. He is a very frequent flyer and never gets nervous.
ATCNetwork is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2005, 20:31
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
it was....

....Flight KL641 Departure Amsterdam - Schiphol Wed 20 Apr 2005 at 14:15 Arrival New York NY - John F. Kennedy Intl
Wed 20 Apr 2005 at 16:10 (bit later though) Aircraft type Boeing 777, crew was swapped, dunno about a/c
Sensible Garage is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2005, 11:44
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: vatican city
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok this is the official story,

The plane involved was a t7, when the t7 was at the top of climb, a passenger saw "skin-movement" on tof of the wing, above the engine pylon. It was like the upperwing panel was "wobbling" about 2 inches up and down.
This passenger warned the f/a and then the gossip spreaded out thru the cabin.
The co-piloot and captain saw the same and then decided to return to ams.
Next day, the t7 was inspected and it went out for a testflight.
During this flight the t7 was put into a variarity of flight conditions like, heavy banking, fuel dumping, near stalling and put a significant g-force on the plane. There where some moments that there was a boundery layer seperation on the wings what looked the same as the passenger discribed, like you see water flowing on the beach.
So after that you can say that passengers where not aware of a normal airfoil behaviour on a wing.
Don't blame them it is just a aerodynamic speciality to know what it is.
It was a good job of the crew to return to ams for safety reasons.
But there are lessons learned now about this event.

Cheers
Spinnercone is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2005, 18:15
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Hants, UK
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quote

The plane was twenty minutes underway and flew above the Atlantic ocean

unquote

Supersonic 777s. Whatever next?!!
eyeinthesky is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.