Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

Tail numbers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st April 2005 | 06:53
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
From: over here
Tail numbers

Just seen this rather disturbing article;


Barcode technology set to defeat bird watchers

A new security initiative has sprung from the US Department of Defense. Fed up with constant detailed reports on the Internet of the movements of military aircraft, the US Air Force has decided that the practice of painting serial numbers on the vertical fins of their aircraft is to cease.

“There is really no need to have this feature on our fleet in this day and age” said a spokesman “After all, whose benefit is it for? Using 21st century technology, a pilot or ground crew member can easily ascertain the identity of the aircraft he is about to fly, or perform maintenance upon.”

The spokesman went on to say that as aircraft pass through depot maintenance and repaint in the future, they will have sensors embedded in the external skin, which will allow hand-held readers to be used to identify the aircraft, rather like the product barcodes used throughout the retail industry. The highly-visible ‘tail number’ will not be reapplied with the new paint finish, rendering each aircraft unidentifiable to the naked eye. The USAF insignia would remain, as this is mandated under international law.

Plane enthusiasts were shocked by this proposal. “Our hobby will be destroyed by this scheme!” said Rolf Pialo, an aviation fan at one of the USAF’s busiest bases, Rhein-Main at Frankfurt, Germany. “Without the scanners to read these sensors, each aircraft will remain anonymous – there will be no future for our pastime.” Amateur photographers were equally dismayed, as each aircraft of any particular type would look just the same as another.

As yet other Air Forces have not adopted this idea, but if it does prove to be a success, there is no reason why it could not spread world-wide to encompass all military and civilian aircraft, giving benefits in cost as well as providing improved security for crews and passengers alike.



Could be time to throw away the binoculars!
Nopax,thanx is offline  
Old 1st April 2005 | 07:09
  #2 (permalink)  
Gnome de PPRuNe
Community Builder
Community Influencer
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 15,199
Likes: 1,201
From: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Fear not, this will certainly see the development of long range bar-code readers capable of decoding information from a range of several miles and capable of connecting to mobile phone technology so that numbers could be download direct to the pc. No more lost or soggy notebooks...

The serious spotter could thus dispense with most of the usual tools of his trade, viz, binos, airband, biro, and the battered but well loved edition of CAM (leaving more room for thermos and sarnies).
treadigraph is offline  
Old 1st April 2005 | 12:40
  #3 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 291
Likes: 26
From: Hundred Acre Wood
Many moons ago (when good old British Rail was still in existence) there was a plan to do away with train numbers and replace them with barcodes in much the same way. However, the mass of angry complaints this elicited from the blokes on the end of the platforms at Crewe, Doncaster and so on made them change their mind. I suspect something similar may happen in this case too.
Doug E Style is offline  
Old 1st April 2005 | 15:37
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
From: Wet Coast
Wink

Notice the posting date

Seriously, London buses have had these barcodes for years (decades ?) so the H.O. wallas can find them in the traffic. Do buses have tail numbers too ?
PaperTiger is offline  
Old 1st April 2005 | 19:33
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
From: over here
OK, time to 'fess up! Yep, been working on that one for a little while Let's just hope that no-one from the DoD was reading it, stranger things HAVE happened!

Perhaps I should have put it on A.net - they'll believe anything over there!!!

Thanks to all who joined in the fun; Rolf Pialo, Lola Profi, Rollo Piaf and Flora Poil will all be back same time next year!

Nopax,thanx is offline  
Old 1st April 2005 | 20:07
  #6 (permalink)  
Gnome de PPRuNe
Community Builder
Community Influencer
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 15,199
Likes: 1,201
From: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Heck, and there was me, barcoding mad...
treadigraph is offline  
Old 1st April 2005 | 20:15
  #7 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 18,575
Likes: 4
From: UK
Congrats NOPAX - you made it past the 12:00 barrier
BOAC is offline  
Old 1st April 2005 | 20:52
  #8 (permalink)  

Coppula eam se non posit acceptera jocularum
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
From: Northumberland, UK
Many moons ago (when good old British Rail was still in existence) there was a plan to do away with train numbers and replace them with barcodes in much the same way.
And if I remember correctly that plan was announced in the April edition of one of the railway magazines ... a magazine that the previous April suggested 'Roland Rat' would be a good name for a loco.
Evening Star is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.