Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

BIG 747 Freighter for 787

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th February 2005 | 22:25
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: North America
BIG 747 Freighter for 787

http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/...r_050222g.html
lead zeppelin is offline  
Old 26th February 2005 | 01:54
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: I don't know...
Devil

It mite come in handy for moving 777 engines around.
twenty eight is offline  
Old 26th February 2005 | 10:49
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
From: us
One has to wonder whether there is more to this out-sized 744 than meets the eye. It is hard to believe that Boeing anticipates 787 production rates will be such that three of these planes are needed simply to ferry fuselage tubes about.

Interesting that most of the design work will be by Boeing's Russian partner Ilyushin, and the mods will be done in Taipei. And a question to ponder is whether the new design would allow for a pressurized fuselage at some future date.

The girth looks to be greater than an Antonov 225.
SaturnV is offline  
Old 26th February 2005 | 11:50
  #4 (permalink)  
cdb
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: Up, up and away
Beluga

So... how does this freighter compare to the Beluga? Similar sort of size? The Beluga has two engines and a twin tail, if I remember right?
cdb is offline  
Old 26th February 2005 | 13:19
  #5 (permalink)  
Evertonian
30 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 13,470
Likes: 278
From: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
The Beluga has two engines
Perhaps you are thinking of Farnborough, but even then it still had 5 engines left!!

Considering the attention that Section 41 gets, that new bit aft again will make it a costly airframe to maintain..IMHO. They'll also lose space between the wings where the fuel tanks are...assuming they remain there.
Buster Hyman is offline  
Old 27th February 2005 | 03:34
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: London
Talking

Wow i would love to see this aircraft fly!

Jodiekeyz is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.